From: Wang Yugui <wangyugui@e16-tech.com>
To: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] btrfs: fix wrong block_start calculation for btrfs_drop_extent_map_range()
Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2024 08:00:15 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240408080014.74B2.409509F4@e16-tech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4240e179e2439dd1698798e2de79ec59990cbaa0.1712452660.git.wqu@suse.com>
Hi,
> [BUG]
> During my extent_map cleanup/refactor, with more than too strict sanity
> checks, extent-map-tests::test_case_7() would crash my extent_map sanity
> checks.
>
> The problem is, after btrfs_drop_extent_map_range(), the resulted
> extent_map has a @block_start way too large.
> Meanwhile my btrfs_file_extent_item based members are returning a
> correct @disk_bytenr along with correct @offset.
>
> The extent map layout looks like this:
>
> 0 16K 32K 48K
> | PINNED | | Regular |
>
> The regular em at [32K, 48K) also has 32K @block_start.
>
> Then drop range [0, 36K), which should shrink the regular one to be
> [36K, 48K).
> However the @block_start is incorrect, we expect 32K + 4K, but got 52K.
>
> [CAUSE]
> Inside btrfs_drop_extent_map_range() function, if we hit an extent_map
> that covers the target range but is still beyond it, we need to split
> that extent map into half:
>
> |<-- drop range -->|
> |<----- existing extent_map --->|
>
> And if the extent map is not compressed, we need to forward
> extent_map::block_start by the difference between the end of drop range
> and the extent map start.
>
> However in that particular case, the difference is calculated using
> (start + len - em->start).
>
> The problem is @start can be modified if the drop range covers any
> pinned extent.
>
> This leads to wrong calculation, and would be caught by my later
> extent_map sanity checks, which checks the em::block_start against
> btrfs_file_extent_item::disk_bytenr + btrfs_file_extent_item::offset.
>
> And unfortunately this is going to cause data corruption, as the
> splitted em is pointing an incorrect location, can cause either
> unexpected read error or wild writes.
>
> [FIX]
> Fix it by avoiding using @start completely, and use @end - em->start
> instead, which @end is exclusive bytenr number.
>
> And update the test case to verify the @block_start to prevent such
> problem from happening.
>
> CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.7+
> Fixes: c962098ca4af ("btrfs: fix incorrect splitting in btrfs_drop_extent_map_range")
> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
$ git describe --contains c962098ca4af
v6.5-rc7~4^2
so it should be
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.5+
Best Regards
Wang Yugui (wangyugui@e16-tech.com)
2024/04/08
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-08 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-07 1:18 [PATCH] btrfs: fix wrong block_start calculation for btrfs_drop_extent_map_range() Qu Wenruo
2024-04-08 0:00 ` Wang Yugui [this message]
2024-04-08 4:57 ` Greg KH
2024-04-09 12:36 ` David Sterba
2024-04-08 10:48 ` Filipe Manana
2024-04-08 21:53 ` Qu Wenruo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240408080014.74B2.409509F4@e16-tech.com \
--to=wangyugui@e16-tech.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wqu@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox