From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CEBBF70CAD; Mon, 15 Apr 2024 12:42:25 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=148.163.158.5 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1713184948; cv=none; b=Ozkt4mNHGkLcvKsmdAg2FPYodlMe94QIJsFqLkMVLP2xwUCIVjVqPFdzXWXsPxRWM4ssXga838QN72X4UmF2N+Dg6yeEvAPVDHhuKMi9HXE9O7a+eACWng1sCm7w2Ic6DAdi3Kal30F2J0MnzKKu9aKJHZPCKKo6HyQ/bBWykNw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1713184948; c=relaxed/simple; bh=SLqPUDnZQJ7KLOZ3S73Gfp8HN/lMB/aQX+C6Ajq9sJ4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:Content-Type: Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version; b=cwru8VthFwbs3h1SmmhERKumABfjDyOLd5iiWlvJUvi1hyvX9GMiqcESUeFE+RkgYQxY/4Lkk/xtvLKkXoez6lpiHMtX8anRE+pdgkhNVhCnilRLD1sKWO0oH+2o02wFRcHxb9Mx0PNZlqUiuIK3XKu1WcTrdFQt26pxh7nnMsk= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.b=FfSPlHIA; arc=none smtp.client-ip=148.163.158.5 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.b="FfSPlHIA" Received: from pps.filterd (m0353723.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.17.1.19/8.17.1.19) with ESMTP id 43F8TVhh019165; Mon, 15 Apr 2024 12:42:24 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=date : from : to : cc : subject : message-id : references : content-type : in-reply-to : mime-version; s=pp1; bh=RVpea6VquN9ZLWMpRPLrV7d60QonAocYJrd3Fd1Oobk=; b=FfSPlHIAqnK/FJ2PydhNqc4Am3shD4wFGaa6F05pIQqzZtMnJFf3LtUQraPrSzoQqvpk OWbnPo7Vr1dPSy/nhzujBXajo+yFFR+exc5Dv04uxvwbIDttj+5SqwFrU/e5E4oTNZs4 kMSSHRP4yofeQHi7gehxCZlAkDL75zUmIMfvMPeKU9oNFmJlO1BIfPQ6EMOPoOoqFyZ9 xSp8LGVZELhlQ0v9uwNegiobAOMhj96yn3g9Wg5SYwde8Wq69mMCpqIuiFZdI/UAzeVj vhf/ukfOS+FpH/Qr5WA00lPT/bAulBHDDCFxhr2dr967oxsFTBLC5Yw+287Pd8cZ0eia MA== Received: from ppma12.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (dc.9e.1632.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [50.22.158.220]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3xgmufhgvq-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 15 Apr 2024 12:42:24 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma12.dal12v.mail.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma12.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (8.17.1.19/8.17.1.19) with ESMTP id 43FCQBom018162; Mon, 15 Apr 2024 12:42:23 GMT Received: from smtprelay07.fra02v.mail.ibm.com ([9.218.2.229]) by ppma12.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3xg4ct02vq-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 15 Apr 2024 12:42:23 +0000 Received: from smtpav06.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (smtpav06.fra02v.mail.ibm.com [10.20.54.105]) by smtprelay07.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 43FCgIEW49348972 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 15 Apr 2024 12:42:20 GMT Received: from smtpav06.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CBA92004D; Mon, 15 Apr 2024 12:42:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtpav06.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09E5020040; Mon, 15 Apr 2024 12:42:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from osiris (unknown [9.179.22.156]) by smtpav06.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Mon, 15 Apr 2024 12:42:17 +0000 (GMT) Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2024 14:42:16 +0200 From: Heiko Carstens To: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: stable-commits@vger.kernel.org, gbayer@linux.ibm.com, Alexandra Winter , Thorsten Winkler , Vasily Gorbik , Alexander Gordeev , Christian Borntraeger , Sven Schnelle Subject: Re: Patch "Revert "s390/ism: fix receive message buffer allocation"" has been added to the 6.8-stable tree Message-ID: <20240415124216.7816-B-hca@linux.ibm.com> References: <20240415085924.3035257-1-sashal@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240415085924.3035257-1-sashal@kernel.org> X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-GUID: FzlKNRcO_NzY6X1g3IyERp38BVIHTDYh X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: FzlKNRcO_NzY6X1g3IyERp38BVIHTDYh X-Proofpoint-UnRewURL: 0 URL was un-rewritten Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.272,Aquarius:18.0.1011,Hydra:6.0.619,FMLib:17.11.176.26 definitions=2024-04-15_10,2024-04-15_01,2023-05-22_02 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 phishscore=0 priorityscore=1501 mlxscore=0 spamscore=0 adultscore=0 mlxlogscore=957 impostorscore=0 malwarescore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 clxscore=1011 suspectscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2404010000 definitions=main-2404150082 On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 04:59:24AM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote: > This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled > > Revert "s390/ism: fix receive message buffer allocation" > > to the 6.8-stable tree which can be found at: > http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary > > The filename of the patch is: > revert-s390-ism-fix-receive-message-buffer-allocatio.patch > and it can be found in the queue-6.8 subdirectory. > > If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, > please let know about it. > > > > commit 8568beeed3944bd4bf4c3683993a9df6ae53fbb7 > Author: Gerd Bayer > Date: Tue Apr 9 13:37:53 2024 +0200 > > Revert "s390/ism: fix receive message buffer allocation" > > [ Upstream commit d51dc8dd6ab6f93a894ff8b38d3b8d02c98eb9fb ] > > This reverts commit 58effa3476536215530c9ec4910ffc981613b413. > Review was not finished on this patch. So it's not ready for > upstreaming. > > Signed-off-by: Gerd Bayer > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240409113753.2181368-1-gbayer@linux.ibm.com > Fixes: 58effa347653 ("s390/ism: fix receive message buffer allocation") > Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni > Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin I'm not sure if it makes sense to add and revert a patch within a single stable queue (the same applies to 6.6). It might make sense to drop both patches.