From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D93F513CFB7; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 13:28:07 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1713360488; cv=none; b=CIMn9xFKTfkxfLsNkaEFEFuY7Z4uiGe0JmF8SZ3ry14CU3D+tRcVltHZRuMTZF+4ewm6co9AXS8PpBWBpAyVNnzhY8fSTWlOMR+qTpDE2AVVkZQPf1x1U8UmHMJWYDMaqlhEJKcNJ8tt8QNBTBTomaYcthT0VYzaa4WSORfTR28= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1713360488; c=relaxed/simple; bh=WsPDv7AF1G0PbOV+/cjKhePBPo6kURl1Gyj2WmHRyn4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=FXNndVAKqxkURqFy+GXSSvW9Kx8FNSgAvvTlc49+QiB3IjFc+Jix9E0iQHSn486754aE38am854DT+xBMulLKkjWSrWsgrkHzhRR66XHmbgNepc1SBoTUxt4wYP/X9raoLrQlqcaR+/9y8t59C9hlvZOPWWTJedZtR2iojBV4/s= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b=RqDbioDv; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b="RqDbioDv" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D4668C072AA; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 13:28:06 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1713360487; bh=WsPDv7AF1G0PbOV+/cjKhePBPo6kURl1Gyj2WmHRyn4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=RqDbioDvLVzUHbdmeiDnGfLAbZNsZmUDDasrCiVyIfe+b5z4wli961BtQtIRoeoaa 0qvPQN46xgVGZBxW9CN4qdUrACqVG6CLonK4xSyf2ucpRBLT/xItM9m34HBDqd4o9P a84BUqpm5i3ERzMFpIyQfcbiVJPYQnzc/pQ/fOM0= Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 15:28:04 +0200 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Pavel Machek Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com, srw@sladewatkins.net, rwarsow@gmx.de, conor@kernel.org, allen.lkml@gmail.com, broonie@kernel.org, alex.williamson@redhat.com, seanjc@google.com, jpoimboe@redhat.com, michael.roth@amd.com, dsterba@suse.com, aric.cyr@amd.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/294] 5.10.215-rc1 review Message-ID: <2024041739-faceted-sandpit-0818@gregkh> References: <20240411095435.633465671@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 02:59:16PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.215 release. > > There are 294 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > let me know. > > > Alex Williamson > > vfio/pci: Create persistent INTx handler > > This introduces memory leak in vfio_intx_enable() -- name is not freed > in case vdev->ctx = kzalloc() fails, for example. So is the upstream commit wrong, or the backport wrong? > > Sean Christopherson > > x86/cpufeatures: Add CPUID_LNX_5 to track recently added Linux-defined word > > AFAICT this is not needed in 5.10. Why not? > > Josh Poimboeuf > > objtool: Add asm version of STACK_FRAME_NON_STANDARD > > Asm version of this macro is not used in 5.10. It fixed an issue. > > Michael Roth > > x86/head/64: Re-enable stack protection > > This is preparation for preparation for SEV-SNP CPUID patches, I don't > believe we plan that for 6.1. This is 5.10, not 6.1. And are you sure that this is not needed? Remember the x86 speculation mess that is happening here. > > David Sterba > > btrfs: handle chunk tree lookup error in btrfs_relocate_sys_chunks() > > (This applies to 4.19, too). mutex_unlock() is needed before "goto > error" here. So can you provide that fix please? > > Aric Cyr > > drm/amd/display: Fix nanosec stat overflow > > (This applies to 4.19, too). This is wrong. It updates prototypes but > not actual functions. So should it be dropped or added to 4.19? confused, greg k-h