From: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
To: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] drm/xe/vm: prevent UAF in rebind_work_func()
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2024 08:47:23 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240423074721.119633-4-matthew.auld@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240423074721.119633-3-matthew.auld@intel.com>
We flush the rebind worker during the vm close phase, however in places
like preempt_fence_work_func() we seem to queue the rebind worker
without first checking if the vm has already been closed. The concern
here is the vm being closed with the worker flushed, but then being
rearmed later, which looks like potential uaf, since there is no actual
refcounting to track the queued worker. We can't take the vm->lock here
in preempt_rebind_work_func() to first check if the vm is closed since
that will deadlock, so instead flush the worker again when the vm
refcount reaches zero.
v2:
- Grabbing vm->lock in the preempt worker creates a deadlock, so
checking the closed state is tricky. Instead flush the worker when
the refcount reaches zero. It should be impossible to queue the
preempt worker without already holding vm ref.
Fixes: dd08ebf6c352 ("drm/xe: Introduce a new DRM driver for Intel GPUs")
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/xe/kernel/-/issues/1676
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/xe/kernel/-/issues/1591
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/xe/kernel/-/issues/1304
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/xe/kernel/-/issues/1249
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v6.8+
---
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c
index 2ba7c920a8af..71de9848bdc2 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c
@@ -1509,6 +1509,9 @@ static void vm_destroy_work_func(struct work_struct *w)
/* xe_vm_close_and_put was not called? */
xe_assert(xe, !vm->size);
+ if (xe_vm_in_preempt_fence_mode(vm))
+ flush_work(&vm->preempt.rebind_work);
+
mutex_destroy(&vm->snap_mutex);
if (!(vm->flags & XE_VM_FLAG_MIGRATION))
--
2.44.0
next parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-23 7:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20240423074721.119633-3-matthew.auld@intel.com>
2024-04-23 7:47 ` Matthew Auld [this message]
2024-04-24 3:45 ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/xe/vm: prevent UAF in rebind_work_func() Matthew Brost
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240423074721.119633-4-matthew.auld@intel.com \
--to=matthew.auld@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox