From: Nam Cao <namcao@linutronix.de>
To: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
Cc: Jaya Kumar <jayalk@intworks.biz>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>,
Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com>,
linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tiwai@suse.de,
bigeasy@linutronix.de, patrik.r.jakobsson@gmail.com,
Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@oracle.com>,
George Kennedy <george.kennedy@oracle.com>,
Darren Kenny <darren.kenny@oracle.com>,
chuansheng.liu@intel.com,
Harshit Mogalapalli <harshit.m.mogalapalli@oracle.com>,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fbdev: fix incorrect address computation in deferred IO
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2024 11:55:38 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240423095538.m79ML6a0@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <666d986e-5227-4b6d-829c-95ff16115488@suse.de>
On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 10:37:41AM +0200, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> thanks for following through with the bug and sending the patch
>
> Am 19.04.24 um 21:00 schrieb Nam Cao:
> > With deferred IO enabled, a page fault happens when data is written to the
> > framebuffer device. Then driver determines which page is being updated by
> > calculating the offset of the written virtual address within the virtual
> > memory area, and uses this offset to get the updated page within the
> > internal buffer. This page is later copied to hardware (thus the name
> > "deferred IO").
> >
> > This calculation is only correct if the virtual memory area is mapped to
> > the beginning of the internal buffer. Otherwise this is wrong. For example,
> > if users do:
> > mmap(ptr, 4096, PROT_WRITE, MAP_FIXED | MAP_SHARED, fd, 0xff000);
> >
> > Then the virtual memory area will mapped at offset 0xff000 within the
> > internal buffer. This offset 0xff000 is not accounted for, and wrong page
> > is updated. This will lead to wrong pixels being updated on the device.
> >
> > However, it gets worse: if users do 2 mmap to the same virtual address, for
> > example:
> >
> > int fd = open("/dev/fb0", O_RDWR, 0);
> > char *ptr = (char *) 0x20000000ul;
> > mmap(ptr, 4096, PROT_WRITE, MAP_FIXED | MAP_SHARED, fd, 0xff000);
> > *ptr = 0; // write #1
> > mmap(ptr, 4096, PROT_WRITE, MAP_FIXED | MAP_SHARED, fd, 0);
> > *ptr = 0; // write #2
> >
> > In this case, both write #1 and write #2 apply to the same virtual address
> > (0x20000000ul), and the driver mistakenly thinks the same page is being
> > written to. When the second write happens, the driver thinks this is the
> > same page as the last time, and reuse the page from write #1. The driver
> > then lock_page() an incorrect page, and returns VM_FAULT_LOCKED with the
> > correct page unlocked. It is unclear what will happen with memory
> > management subsystem after that, but likely something terrible.
>
> Please tone down the drama. :)
Sorry, that wasn't intentional. Writing is hard :(
Let me just cut this out, this info is not really needed to justify the
changes.
>
> >
> > Fix this by taking the mapping offset into account.
> >
> > Reported-and-tested-by: Harshit Mogalapalli <harshit.m.mogalapalli@oracle.com>
> > Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fbdev/271372d6-e665-4e7f-b088-dee5f4ab341a@oracle.com
> > Fixes: 56c134f7f1b5 ("fbdev: Track deferred-I/O pages in pageref struct")
> > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> > Signed-off-by: Nam Cao <namcao@linutronix.de>
> > ---
> > drivers/video/fbdev/core/fb_defio.c | 3 ++-
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/core/fb_defio.c b/drivers/video/fbdev/core/fb_defio.c
> > index dae96c9f61cf..d5d6cd9e8b29 100644
> > --- a/drivers/video/fbdev/core/fb_defio.c
> > +++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/core/fb_defio.c
> > @@ -196,7 +196,8 @@ static vm_fault_t fb_deferred_io_track_page(struct fb_info *info, unsigned long
> > */
> > static vm_fault_t fb_deferred_io_page_mkwrite(struct fb_info *info, struct vm_fault *vmf)
> > {
> > - unsigned long offset = vmf->address - vmf->vma->vm_start;
> > + unsigned long offset = vmf->address - vmf->vma->vm_start
> > + + (vmf->vma->vm_pgoff << PAGE_SHIFT);
>
> The page-fault handler at [1] use vm_fault.pgoff to retrieve the page
> structure. Can we do the same here and avoid that computation?
Yes, thanks for the suggestion.
It will change things a bit: offset will not be the exact value anymore,
but will be rounded down to multiple of PAGE_SIZE. But that doesn't matter,
because it will only be used to calculate the page offset later on.
We can clean this up and rename this "offset" to "pg_offset". But that's
for another day.
Best regards,
Nam
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-23 9:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-19 19:00 [PATCH] fbdev: fix incorrect address computation in deferred IO Nam Cao
2024-04-23 8:37 ` Thomas Zimmermann
2024-04-23 9:55 ` Nam Cao [this message]
2024-04-23 11:27 ` Thomas Zimmermann
2024-04-23 11:39 ` Nam Cao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240423095538.m79ML6a0@linutronix.de \
--to=namcao@linutronix.de \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=chuansheng.liu@intel.com \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=darren.kenny@oracle.com \
--cc=deller@gmx.de \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=george.kennedy@oracle.com \
--cc=harshit.m.mogalapalli@oracle.com \
--cc=javierm@redhat.com \
--cc=jayalk@intworks.biz \
--cc=linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=patrik.r.jakobsson@gmail.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tiwai@suse.de \
--cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
--cc=vegard.nossum@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox