RE,

RE,

[Miss Juliet Muhammad]

I have a deal for you, in your region.

RE,

[Ms Sharifah Ahmad Mustahfa]

-- 
Hello,

First of all i will like to apologies for my manner of communication 
because you do not know me personally, its due to the fact that i have a 
very important proposal for you.

Re:

[Jarkko Sakkinen]

On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 12:10:33AM +0000, David Howells wrote:
> 
> From: Tianjia Zhang <tianjia.zhang@linux.alibaba.com>
> 
> On the following call path, `sig->pkey_algo` is not assigned
> in asymmetric_key_verify_signature(), which causes runtime
> crash in public_key_verify_signature().
> 
>   keyctl_pkey_verify
>     asymmetric_key_verify_signature
>       verify_signature
>         public_key_verify_signature
> 
> This patch simply check this situation and fixes the crash
> caused by NULL pointer.
> 
> Fixes: 215525639631 ("X.509: support OSCCA SM2-with-SM3 certificate verification")
> Reported-by: Tobias Markus <tobias@markus-regensburg.de>
> Signed-off-by: Tianjia Zhang <tianjia.zhang@linux.alibaba.com>
> Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
> Reviewed-and-tested-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com>
> Tested-by: João Fonseca <jpedrofonseca@ua.pt>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.10+
> ---

For what it's worth

Acked-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>

/Jarkko

> 
>  crypto/asymmetric_keys/public_key.c |    3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/crypto/asymmetric_keys/public_key.c b/crypto/asymmetric_keys/public_key.c
> index 8892908ad58c..788a4ba1e2e7 100644
> --- a/crypto/asymmetric_keys/public_key.c
> +++ b/crypto/asymmetric_keys/public_key.c
> @@ -356,7 +356,8 @@ int public_key_verify_signature(const struct public_key *pkey,
>  	if (ret)
>  		goto error_free_key;
>  
> -	if (strcmp(sig->pkey_algo, "sm2") == 0 && sig->data_size) {
> +	if (sig->pkey_algo && strcmp(sig->pkey_algo, "sm2") == 0 &&
> +	    sig->data_size) {
>  		ret = cert_sig_digest_update(sig, tfm);
>  		if (ret)
>  			goto error_free_key;
> 
> 

Re:

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

On Mon, Jun 06, 2022 at 11:03:24AM +0530, Fenil Jain wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 03, 2022 at 07:43:01PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.18.2 release.
> > There are 67 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Sun, 05 Jun 2022 17:38:05 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> Hey Greg,
> 
> Ran tests and boot tested on my system, no regression found
> 
> Tested-by: Fenil Jain<fkjainco@gmail.com>

Thanks for the testing, but something went wrong with your email client
and it lost the Subject: line, making this impossible to be picked up by
our tools.

Also, please include an extra ' ' before the '<' character in your
tested-by line.

thanks,

greg k-h

Re:

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

On Wed, Nov 09, 2022 at 05:34:13PM +0300, Denis Arefev wrote:
> Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2022 16:52:17 +0300
> Subject: [PATCH 5.10] nbio_v7_4: Add pointer check
> 
> Return value of a function 'amdgpu_ras_find_obj' is dereferenced at nbio_v7_4.c:325 without checking for null
> 
> Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Denis Arefev <arefev@swemel.ru>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/nbio_v7_4.c | 3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/nbio_v7_4.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/nbio_v7_4.c
> index eadc9526d33f..d2627a610e48 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/nbio_v7_4.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/nbio_v7_4.c
> @@ -303,6 +303,9 @@ static void nbio_v7_4_handle_ras_controller_intr_no_bifring(struct amdgpu_device
>  	struct ras_manager *obj = amdgpu_ras_find_obj(adev, adev->nbio.ras_if);
>  	struct ras_err_data err_data = {0, 0, 0, NULL};
>  	struct amdgpu_ras *ras = amdgpu_ras_get_context(adev);
> 
> +	if (!obj)
> +		return;
>  
>  	bif_doorbell_intr_cntl = RREG32_SOC15(NBIO, 0, mmBIF_DOORBELL_INT_CNTL);
>  	if (REG_GET_FIELD(bif_doorbell_intr_cntl,
> -- 
> 2.25.1
> 


<formletter>

This is not the correct way to submit patches for inclusion in the
stable kernel tree.  Please read:
    https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/stable-kernel-rules.html
for how to do this properly.

</formletter>

Re:

[Mahmut Akten]

Hello

I need your urgent response to a transaction request attached to your name/email stable@vger.kernel.org I would like to discuss with you now. 

Thank You
Mahmut Akten
Vice Chairman
Garanti BBVA Bank (Turkey)
www.garantibbva.com.tr

(no subject)

[George Guo]

[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain; charset=y, Size: 3602 bytes --]

Subject: [PATCH 4.19.y v6 0/2] Double-free bug discovery on testing trigger-field-variable-support.tc

1) About v4-0001-tracing-Remove-hist-trigger-synth_var_refs.patch:

The reason I am backporting this patch is that no one found the double-free bug
at that time, then later the code was removed on upstream, but
4.19-stable has the bug.

This is tested via "./ftracetest test.d/trigger/inter-event/
trigger-field-variable-support.tc"
==================================================================
BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in destroy_hist_field+0x115/0x140
Read of size 4 at addr ffff888012e95318 by task ftracetest/1858

CPU: 1 PID: 1858 Comm: ftracetest Kdump: loaded Tainted: GE 4.19.90-89 #24
Source Version: Unknown
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.13.0
Call Trace:
 dump_stack+0xcb/0x10b
 print_address_description.cold+0x54/0x249
 kasan_report_error.cold+0x63/0xab
 ? destroy_hist_field+0x115/0x140
 __asan_report_load4_noabort+0x8d/0xa0
 ? destroy_hist_field+0x115/0x140
 destroy_hist_field+0x115/0x140
 destroy_hist_data+0x4e4/0x9a0
 event_hist_trigger_free+0x212/0x2f0
 ? update_cond_flag+0x128/0x170
 ? event_hist_trigger_func+0x2880/0x2880
 hist_unregister_trigger+0x2f2/0x4f0
 event_hist_trigger_func+0x168c/0x2880
 ? tracing_map_read_var_once+0xd0/0xd0
 ? create_key_field+0x520/0x520
 ? __mutex_lock_slowpath+0x10/0x10
 event_trigger_write+0x2f4/0x490
 ? trigger_start+0x180/0x180
 ? __fget_light+0x369/0x5d0
 ? count_memcg_event_mm+0x104/0x2b0
 ? trigger_start+0x180/0x180
 __vfs_write+0x81/0x100
 vfs_write+0x1e1/0x540
 ksys_write+0x12a/0x290
 ? __ia32_sys_read+0xb0/0xb0
 ? __close_fd+0x1d3/0x280
 do_syscall_64+0xe3/0x2d0
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x5c/0xc1
RIP: 0033:0x7efdd342ee04
Code: 00 f7 d8 64 89 02 48 c7 c0 ff ff ff ff eb b3 0f 1f 80 00 00 00 00 48
8d 05 39 34 0c 00 8b 00 85 c0 75 13 b8 01 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 00 f0 ff
ff 77 54 f3 c3 66 90 41 54 55 49 89 d4 53 48 89 f5
RSP: 002b:00007ffda01f5e08 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000001
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00000000000000b4 RCX: 00007efdd342ee04
RDX: 00000000000000b4 RSI: 000055c5b41b1e90 RDI: 0000000000000001
RBP: 000055c5b41b1e90 R08: 000000000000000a R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 000000000000000a R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007efdd34ed5c0
R13: 00000000000000b4 R14: 00007efdd34ed7c0 R15: 00000000000000b4
==================================================================

2) About v4-0002-tracing-Use-var_refs-for-hist-trigger-reference-c.patch:

Only v4-0001-tracing-Remove-hist-trigger-synth_var_refs.patch will lead
to compilation errors:

../kernel/trace/trace_events_hist.c: In function ‘find_var_ref’:
../kernel/trace/trace_events_hist.c:1364:36: error: ‘struct hist_trigger_data’ has no member named ‘n_synth_var_refs’; did you mean ‘n_var_refs’?
 1364 |         for (i = 0; i < hist_data->n_synth_var_refs; i++) {
      |                                    ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
      |                                    n_var_refs
../kernel/trace/trace_events_hist.c:1365:41: error: ‘struct hist_trigger_data’ has no member named ‘synth_var_refs’; did you mean ‘n_var_refs’?
 1365 |                 hist_field = hist_data->synth_var_refs[i];
      |                                         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
      |                                         n_var_refs


Tom Zanussi (2):
  tracing: Remove hist trigger synth_var_refs
  tracing: Use var_refs[] for hist trigger reference checking

 kernel/trace/trace_events_hist.c | 86 ++++----------------------------
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 75 deletions(-)

-- 
2.34.1

[PATCH 4.19.y v6 1/2] tracing: Remove hist trigger synth_var_refs

[George Guo]

From: Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@linux.intel.com>

commit 912201345f7c39e6b0ac283207be2b6641fa47b9 upstream.

All var_refs are now handled uniformly and there's no reason to treat
the synth_refs in a special way now, so remove them and associated
functions.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/b4d3470526b8f0426dcec125399dad9ad9b8589d.1545161087.git.tom.zanussi@linux.intel.com

Acked-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: George Guo <guodongtai@kylinos.cn>
---
 kernel/trace/trace_events_hist.c | 18 ------------------
 1 file changed, 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_events_hist.c b/kernel/trace/trace_events_hist.c
index e004daf8cad5..e4f5b6894cf2 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_events_hist.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_events_hist.c
@@ -280,8 +280,6 @@ struct hist_trigger_data {
 	struct action_data		*actions[HIST_ACTIONS_MAX];
 	unsigned int			n_actions;
 
-	struct hist_field               *synth_var_refs[SYNTH_FIELDS_MAX];
-	unsigned int                    n_synth_var_refs;
 	struct field_var		*field_vars[SYNTH_FIELDS_MAX];
 	unsigned int			n_field_vars;
 	unsigned int			n_field_var_str;
@@ -3708,20 +3706,6 @@ static void save_field_var(struct hist_trigger_data *hist_data,
 }
 
 
-static void destroy_synth_var_refs(struct hist_trigger_data *hist_data)
-{
-	unsigned int i;
-
-	for (i = 0; i < hist_data->n_synth_var_refs; i++)
-		destroy_hist_field(hist_data->synth_var_refs[i], 0);
-}
-
-static void save_synth_var_ref(struct hist_trigger_data *hist_data,
-			 struct hist_field *var_ref)
-{
-	hist_data->synth_var_refs[hist_data->n_synth_var_refs++] = var_ref;
-}
-
 static int check_synth_field(struct synth_event *event,
 			     struct hist_field *hist_field,
 			     unsigned int field_pos)
@@ -3884,7 +3868,6 @@ static int onmatch_create(struct hist_trigger_data *hist_data,
 				goto err;
 			}
 
-			save_synth_var_ref(hist_data, var_ref);
 			field_pos++;
 			kfree(p);
 			continue;
@@ -4631,7 +4614,6 @@ static void destroy_hist_data(struct hist_trigger_data *hist_data)
 	destroy_actions(hist_data);
 	destroy_field_vars(hist_data);
 	destroy_field_var_hists(hist_data);
-	destroy_synth_var_refs(hist_data);
 
 	kfree(hist_data);
 }
-- 
2.34.1

[PATCH 4.19.y v6 2/2] tracing: Use var_refs[] for hist trigger reference checking

[George Guo]

From: Tom Zanussi <tzanussi@gmail.com>

commit e4f6d245031e04bdd12db390298acec0474a1a46 upstream.

Since all the variable reference hist_fields are collected into
hist_data->var_refs[] array, there's no need to go through all the
fields looking for them, or in separate arrays like synth_var_refs[],
which will be going away soon anyway.

This also allows us to get rid of some unnecessary code and functions
currently used for the same purpose.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1545246556.4239.7.camel@gmail.com

Acked-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: George Guo <guodongtai@kylinos.cn>
---
 kernel/trace/trace_events_hist.c | 68 ++++++--------------------------
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 57 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_events_hist.c b/kernel/trace/trace_events_hist.c
index e4f5b6894cf2..ede370225245 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_events_hist.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_events_hist.c
@@ -1289,49 +1289,13 @@ check_field_for_var_ref(struct hist_field *hist_field,
 			struct hist_trigger_data *var_data,
 			unsigned int var_idx)
 {
-	struct hist_field *found = NULL;
-
-	if (hist_field && hist_field->flags & HIST_FIELD_FL_VAR_REF) {
-		if (hist_field->var.idx == var_idx &&
-		    hist_field->var.hist_data == var_data) {
-			found = hist_field;
-		}
-	}
-
-	return found;
-}
-
-static struct hist_field *
-check_field_for_var_refs(struct hist_trigger_data *hist_data,
-			 struct hist_field *hist_field,
-			 struct hist_trigger_data *var_data,
-			 unsigned int var_idx,
-			 unsigned int level)
-{
-	struct hist_field *found = NULL;
-	unsigned int i;
-
-	if (level > 3)
-		return found;
-
-	if (!hist_field)
-		return found;
-
-	found = check_field_for_var_ref(hist_field, var_data, var_idx);
-	if (found)
-		return found;
-
-	for (i = 0; i < HIST_FIELD_OPERANDS_MAX; i++) {
-		struct hist_field *operand;
+	WARN_ON(!(hist_field && hist_field->flags & HIST_FIELD_FL_VAR_REF));
 
-		operand = hist_field->operands[i];
-		found = check_field_for_var_refs(hist_data, operand, var_data,
-						 var_idx, level + 1);
-		if (found)
-			return found;
-	}
+	if (hist_field && hist_field->var.idx == var_idx &&
+	    hist_field->var.hist_data == var_data)
+		return hist_field;
 
-	return found;
+	return NULL;
 }
 
 /**
@@ -1350,26 +1314,16 @@ static struct hist_field *find_var_ref(struct hist_trigger_data *hist_data,
 				       struct hist_trigger_data *var_data,
 				       unsigned int var_idx)
 {
-	struct hist_field *hist_field, *found = NULL;
+	struct hist_field *hist_field;
 	unsigned int i;
 
-	for_each_hist_field(i, hist_data) {
-		hist_field = hist_data->fields[i];
-		found = check_field_for_var_refs(hist_data, hist_field,
-						 var_data, var_idx, 0);
-		if (found)
-			return found;
-	}
-
-	for (i = 0; i < hist_data->n_synth_var_refs; i++) {
-		hist_field = hist_data->synth_var_refs[i];
-		found = check_field_for_var_refs(hist_data, hist_field,
-						 var_data, var_idx, 0);
-		if (found)
-			return found;
+	for (i = 0; i < hist_data->n_var_refs; i++) {
+		hist_field = hist_data->var_refs[i];
+		if (check_field_for_var_ref(hist_field, var_data, var_idx))
+			return hist_field;
 	}
 
-	return found;
+	return NULL;
 }
 
 /**
-- 
2.34.1

Re:

[Greg KH]

On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 11:46:56PM +0800, George Guo wrote:
> Subject: [PATCH 4.19.y v6 0/2] Double-free bug discovery on testing trigger-field-variable-support.tc
> 
> 1) About v4-0001-tracing-Remove-hist-trigger-synth_var_refs.patch:
> 
> The reason I am backporting this patch is that no one found the double-free bug
> at that time, then later the code was removed on upstream, but
> 4.19-stable has the bug.

Both now queued up, thanks

greg k-h

Re:

[Christoph Biedl]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 828 bytes --]

the Hide wrote...

> Who should I contact regarding the following error
> 
> 
> E: Malformed entry 5 in list file
> /etc/apt/sources.list.d/additional-repositories.list (Component)
> E: The list of sources could not be read.
> E: _cache->open() failed, please report.


Assuming you're using Debian and not some derivatve: Some Debian users
mailing list, like <https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/>

From the above error message I assume there's a format error in
/etc/apt/sources.list.d/additional-repositories.list - so it was wise to
include the content of that file in a message to that list.

If it's actually a bug in apt, the Debian bug tracker was the place to
go. This list here however is about development of the Linux kernel, the
stable releases, so not quite the right place.

    Christoph

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

Re:

[Greg KH]

On Wed, Aug 13, 2025 at 06:25:32PM +0100, Jon Hunter wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 13, 2025 at 08:48:28AM -0700, Jon Hunter wrote:
> > On Tue, 12 Aug 2025 19:43:28 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.15.10 release.
> > > There are 480 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > let me know.
> > > 
> > > Responses should be made by Thu, 14 Aug 2025 17:42:20 +0000.
> > > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > > 
> > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > > 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.15.10-rc1.gz
> > > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > > 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.15.y
> > > and the diffstat can be found below.
> > > 
> > > thanks,
> > > 
> > > greg k-h
> > 
> > Failures detected for Tegra ...
> > 
> > Test results for stable-v6.15:
> >     10 builds:	10 pass, 0 fail
> >     28 boots:	28 pass, 0 fail
> >     120 tests:	119 pass, 1 fail
> > 
> > Linux version:	6.15.10-rc1-g2510f67e2e34
> > Boards tested:	tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000,
> >                 tegra186-p3509-0000+p3636-0001, tegra194-p2972-0000,
> >                 tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000, tegra20-ventana,
> >                 tegra210-p2371-2180, tegra210-p3450-0000,
> >                 tegra30-cardhu-a04
> > 
> > Test failures:	tegra194-p2972-0000: boot.py
> 
> I am seeing the following kernel warning for both linux-6.15.y and linux-6.16.y …
> 
>  WARNING KERN sched: DL replenish lagged too much
> 
> I believe that this is introduced by …
> 
> Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
>     sched/deadline: Less agressive dl_server handling
> 
> This has been reported here: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAMuHMdXn4z1pioTtBGMfQM0jsLviqS2jwysaWXpoLxWYoGa82w@mail.gmail.com/

I've now dropped this.

Is that causing the test failure for you?

thanks,

greg k-h

Re:

[Jon Hunter]

On 14/08/2025 16:36, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 13, 2025 at 06:25:32PM +0100, Jon Hunter wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 13, 2025 at 08:48:28AM -0700, Jon Hunter wrote:
>>> On Tue, 12 Aug 2025 19:43:28 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>>>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.15.10 release.
>>>> There are 480 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>>>> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>>>> let me know.
>>>>
>>>> Responses should be made by Thu, 14 Aug 2025 17:42:20 +0000.
>>>> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>>>>
>>>> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>>>> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.15.10-rc1.gz
>>>> or in the git tree and branch at:
>>>> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.15.y
>>>> and the diffstat can be found below.
>>>>
>>>> thanks,
>>>>
>>>> greg k-h
>>>
>>> Failures detected for Tegra ...
>>>
>>> Test results for stable-v6.15:
>>>      10 builds:	10 pass, 0 fail
>>>      28 boots:	28 pass, 0 fail
>>>      120 tests:	119 pass, 1 fail
>>>
>>> Linux version:	6.15.10-rc1-g2510f67e2e34
>>> Boards tested:	tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000,
>>>                  tegra186-p3509-0000+p3636-0001, tegra194-p2972-0000,
>>>                  tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000, tegra20-ventana,
>>>                  tegra210-p2371-2180, tegra210-p3450-0000,
>>>                  tegra30-cardhu-a04
>>>
>>> Test failures:	tegra194-p2972-0000: boot.py
>>
>> I am seeing the following kernel warning for both linux-6.15.y and linux-6.16.y …
>>
>>   WARNING KERN sched: DL replenish lagged too much
>>
>> I believe that this is introduced by …
>>
>> Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
>>      sched/deadline: Less agressive dl_server handling
>>
>> This has been reported here: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAMuHMdXn4z1pioTtBGMfQM0jsLviqS2jwysaWXpoLxWYoGa82w@mail.gmail.com/
> 
> I've now dropped this.
> 
> Is that causing the test failure for you?

Yes that is causing the test failure. Thanks!

Jon

-- 
nvpublic

Re:

[Greg KH]

On Fri, Aug 15, 2025 at 05:20:34PM +0100, Jon Hunter wrote:
> On 14/08/2025 16:36, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 13, 2025 at 06:25:32PM +0100, Jon Hunter wrote:
> > > On Wed, Aug 13, 2025 at 08:48:28AM -0700, Jon Hunter wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 12 Aug 2025 19:43:28 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.15.10 release.
> > > > > There are 480 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > > > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > > > let me know.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Responses should be made by Thu, 14 Aug 2025 17:42:20 +0000.
> > > > > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > > > > 
> > > > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > > > > 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.15.10-rc1.gz
> > > > > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > > > > 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.15.y
> > > > > and the diffstat can be found below.
> > > > > 
> > > > > thanks,
> > > > > 
> > > > > greg k-h
> > > > 
> > > > Failures detected for Tegra ...
> > > > 
> > > > Test results for stable-v6.15:
> > > >      10 builds:	10 pass, 0 fail
> > > >      28 boots:	28 pass, 0 fail
> > > >      120 tests:	119 pass, 1 fail
> > > > 
> > > > Linux version:	6.15.10-rc1-g2510f67e2e34
> > > > Boards tested:	tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000,
> > > >                  tegra186-p3509-0000+p3636-0001, tegra194-p2972-0000,
> > > >                  tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000, tegra20-ventana,
> > > >                  tegra210-p2371-2180, tegra210-p3450-0000,
> > > >                  tegra30-cardhu-a04
> > > > 
> > > > Test failures:	tegra194-p2972-0000: boot.py
> > > 
> > > I am seeing the following kernel warning for both linux-6.15.y and linux-6.16.y …
> > > 
> > >   WARNING KERN sched: DL replenish lagged too much
> > > 
> > > I believe that this is introduced by …
> > > 
> > > Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> > >      sched/deadline: Less agressive dl_server handling
> > > 
> > > This has been reported here: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAMuHMdXn4z1pioTtBGMfQM0jsLviqS2jwysaWXpoLxWYoGa82w@mail.gmail.com/
> > 
> > I've now dropped this.
> > 
> > Is that causing the test failure for you?
> 
> Yes that is causing the test failure. Thanks!

Is the test just noticing the warning message?  Or is it a functional
failure?  Does it also fail on Linus's tree?

thanks,

greg k-h