Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [BUG] e1000e, scheduling while atomic (stable)

Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [BUG] e1000e, scheduling while atomic (stable)

[Jérôme Carretero]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1144 bytes --]

Hi Sasha,


Thank you, sorry for the delay but I coudln't reboot.

Adding Greg KH because I don't know if stable will receive my e-mail
(not subscribed) but the regression was integrated in stable:
 commit 0a4e3c2d976aa4dd38951afd6267f74ef3fade0e
so they should get the fix ASAP too.


Tested-by: Jérôme Carretero <cJ-ko@zougloub.eu>


Best regards,

-- 
Jérôme

On Thu, 2024-04-18 at 06:44 +0300, Sasha Neftin wrote:
> On 17/04/2024 21:46, Jérôme Carretero wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > 
> > I opened https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218740 because
> > I'm
> > not quite sure the culprit is e1000e or some timer stuff.
> 
> Hello Jérôme,
> 
> You hit on regression introduced by 6dbdd4de0362 (used the wrong
> timer 
> during code running in atomic contexts)
> Please, incorporate 
> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/intel-wired-lan/patch/20240417190320.3159360-1-vitaly.lifshits@intel.com/
>  
> in your latest kernel.
> 
> Thanks,
> sasha
> 
> > 
> > I just verified that this happens on the latest master.
> > 
> > 
> > Let me know if I can (quickly) help,
> > 
> > 
> 


[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 854 bytes --]

Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [BUG] e1000e, scheduling while atomic (stable)

[Sasha Neftin]

On 19/04/2024 19:20, Jérôme Carretero wrote:
> Hi Sasha,
> 
> 
> Thank you, sorry for the delay but I coudln't reboot.
> 
> Adding Greg KH because I don't know if stable will receive my e-mail
> (not subscribed) but the regression was integrated in stable:
>   commit 0a4e3c2d976aa4dd38951afd6267f74ef3fade0e
> so they should get the fix ASAP too.
> 
> 
> Tested-by: Jérôme Carretero <cJ-ko@zougloub.eu>
Hello Jérôme,

Can you put your "Tested-by:" tag under 
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/intel-wired-lan/patch/20240417190320.3159360-1-vitaly.lifshits@intel.com/ 
?
(then we will forward it via fixes, hopefully v6.9 candidate will pick 
up it)

Thanks,
Sasha
> 
> 
> Best regards,
> 

Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [BUG] e1000e, scheduling while atomic (stable)

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 12:20:05PM -0400, Jérôme Carretero wrote:
> Hi Sasha,
> 
> 
> Thank you, sorry for the delay but I coudln't reboot.
> 
> Adding Greg KH because I don't know if stable will receive my e-mail
> (not subscribed) but the regression was integrated in stable:
>  commit 0a4e3c2d976aa4dd38951afd6267f74ef3fade0e
> so they should get the fix ASAP too.

The fix needs to show up in Linus's tree, is it on its way there?

thanks,

greg k-h

Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [BUG] e1000e, scheduling while atomic (stable)

[Sasha Neftin]

On 23/04/2024 19:23, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 12:20:05PM -0400, Jérôme Carretero wrote:
>> Hi Sasha,
>>
>>
>> Thank you, sorry for the delay but I coudln't reboot.
>>
>> Adding Greg KH because I don't know if stable will receive my e-mail
>> (not subscribed) but the regression was integrated in stable:
>>   commit 0a4e3c2d976aa4dd38951afd6267f74ef3fade0e
>> so they should get the fix ASAP too.
> 
> The fix needs to show up in Linus's tree, is it on its way there?

yes. Routed via intel-wired-lan: 
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/intel-wired-lan/patch/20240417190320.3159360-1-vitaly.lifshits@intel.com/

> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h

Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [BUG] e1000e, scheduling while atomic (stable)

[Artem S. Tashkinov]

Hello,

This fix is still not queued in 6.8 stable:

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git/tree/queue-6.8

Why?

Regards,
Artem

Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [BUG] e1000e, scheduling while atomic (stable)

[Greg KH]

On Sat, Apr 27, 2024 at 10:54:23AM +0000, Artem S. Tashkinov wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> This fix is still not queued in 6.8 stable:

What fix?

> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git/tree/queue-6.8
> 
> Why?

What is the git id of the change in Linus's tree?

thanks,

greg k-h

Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [BUG] e1000e, scheduling while atomic (stable)

[Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)]

On 27.04.24 13:14, Greg KH wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 27, 2024 at 10:54:23AM +0000, Artem S. Tashkinov wrote:
>> This fix is still not queued in 6.8 stable:
> What fix?

FWIW, this one:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240417190320.3159360-1-vitaly.lifshits@intel.com/

But sadly the review is still pending (and hence it's not yet eligible
for inclusion in stable afaics):
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/ded3e7ae-6a7d-48b2-8acc-c125874ee09f@leemhuis.info/

HTH, Ciao, Thorsten

Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [BUG] e1000e, scheduling while atomic (stable)

[Tony Nguyen]

On 4/28/2024 1:01 AM, Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis) wrote:
> On 27.04.24 13:14, Greg KH wrote:
>> On Sat, Apr 27, 2024 at 10:54:23AM +0000, Artem S. Tashkinov wrote:
>>> This fix is still not queued in 6.8 stable:
>> What fix?
> 
> FWIW, this one:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240417190320.3159360-1-vitaly.lifshits@intel.com/
> 
> But sadly the review is still pending (and hence it's not yet eligible
> for inclusion in stable afaics):
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/ded3e7ae-6a7d-48b2-8acc-c125874ee09f@leemhuis.info/

The team that deals with this driver had holidays last week so that 
delayed things a bit. I was able to touch base with them today and the 
patch has been sent to netdev.

https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20240429171040.1152516-1-anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com/

Thanks,
Tony

> HTH, Ciao, Thorsten