From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Shreeya Patel <shreeya.patel@collabora.com>
Cc: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>,
linux-stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, petr@tesarici.cz,
Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@linaro.org>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>,
Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.com>,
kernel mailing list <kernel@lists.collabora.co.uk>,
kernel@collabora.com, skhan@linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: stable-rc: 5.10: arm: u64_stats_sync.h:136:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'preempt_disable_nested'
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2024 09:59:58 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2024042331-pusher-snowfall-2e23@gregkh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7dc1b-6627e780-5-39ef3480@154053587>
On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 05:53:18PM +0100, Shreeya Patel wrote:
> On Tuesday, April 23, 2024 21:52 IST, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 01:35:28PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> > > The arm and i386 builds failed with clang-17 and gcc-12 on stable-rc
> > > linux.5.10.y
> > > branch with linked config [1].
> > >
> > > Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
> > >
> > > In file included from init/do_mounts.c:7:
> > > In file included from include/linux/suspend.h:5:
> > > In file included from include/linux/swap.h:9:
> > > In file included from include/linux/memcontrol.h:13:
> > > In file included from include/linux/cgroup.h:28:
> > > In file included from include/linux/cgroup-defs.h:20:
> > > include/linux/u64_stats_sync.h:136:2: error: implicit declaration of
> > > function 'preempt_disable_nested'
> > > [-Werror,-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
> > > 136 | preempt_disable_nested();
> > > | ^
> >
> > That function is not in the queue at all, are you sure you are up to
> > date?
> >
>
> Hi Greg,
>
> Just to add, KernelCI has also reported these failures on stable-rc 5.10 kernel recently.
> Following are the details for it :-
>
> 32r2el_defconfig ‐ mips ‐ gcc-101 warning — 2 errors
> allnoconfig ‐ i386 ‐ gcc-101 warning — 2 errors
> haps_hs_smp_defconfig ‐ arc ‐ gcc-107 warnings — 14 errors
> i386_defconfig ‐ i386 ‐ gcc-101 warning — 2 errors
> imx_v6_v7_defconfig ‐ arm ‐ gcc-107 warnings — 14 errors
> multi_v5_defconfig ‐ arm ‐ gcc-108 warnings — 16 errors
> multi_v7_defconfig ‐ arm ‐ gcc-107 warnings — 14 errors
> omap2plus_defconfig ‐ arm ‐ gcc-108 warnings — 16 errors
> rv32_defconfig ‐ riscv ‐ gcc-1010 warnings — 16 errors
> tinyconfig ‐ i386 ‐ gcc-101 warning — 2 errors
> vexpress_defconfig ‐ arm ‐ gcc-109 warnings — 18 errors
>
> Build Logs Summary
> Errors Summary
> include/linux/u64_stats_sync.h:143:2: error: implicit declaration of function ‘preempt_enable_nested’; did you mean ‘preempt_enable_no_resched’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> include/linux/u64_stats_sync.h:136:2: error: implicit declaration of function ‘preempt_disable_nested’; did you mean ‘preempt_disable_notrace’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> include/linux/u64_stats_sync.h:143:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'preempt_enable_nested'; did you mean 'preempt_enable_no_resched'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> include/linux/u64_stats_sync.h:136:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'preempt_disable_nested'; did you mean 'preempt_disable_notrace'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
Again, very odd, I do not see that anywhere in the patch queue. I've
updated the -rc git tree, perhaps an old version was in there somehow...
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-23 17:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-23 8:05 stable-rc: 5.10: arm: u64_stats_sync.h:136:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'preempt_disable_nested' Naresh Kamboju
2024-04-23 16:22 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-04-23 16:53 ` Shreeya Patel
2024-04-23 16:59 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2024-04-24 14:41 ` Dan Carpenter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2024042331-pusher-snowfall-2e23@gregkh \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=anders.roxell@linaro.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=dan.carpenter@linaro.org \
--cc=gustavo.padovan@collabora.com \
--cc=kernel@collabora.com \
--cc=kernel@lists.collabora.co.uk \
--cc=lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=naresh.kamboju@linaro.org \
--cc=petr@tesarici.cz \
--cc=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=shreeya.patel@collabora.com \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox