Old commit back-port

Old commit back-port

[Alex Elder]

This commit landed in Linux v5.16, and should have been back-ported
to stable branches:
   0ac10b291bee8 arm64: dts: qcom: Fix 'interrupt-map' parent address cells

It has three hunks, and the commit can be cherry-picked directly
into the 5.15.y and 5.10.y stable branches.  The first hunk fixes
a problem first introduced in Linux v5.2, so that hunk (only) should
be back-ported to v5.4.y.

Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>

Is there anything further I need to do?  If you'd prefer I send
patches, I can do that also (just ask).  Thanks.

					-Alex


Rob's original fix in Linus' tree:
   0ac10b291bee8 arm64: dts: qcom: Fix 'interrupt-map' parent address cells
This first landed in v5.16.

The commit that introduced the problem in the first hunk:
   b84dfd175c098 arm64: dts: qcom: msm8998: Add PCIe PHY and RC nodes
This first landed in v5.2, so back-port to v5.4.y, v5.10.y, v5.15.y.

The commit that introduced the problem in the second hunk:
   5c538e09cb19b arm64: dts: qcom: sdm845: Add first PCIe controller and PHY
This first landed in v5.7, so back-port to v5.10.y, v5.15.y

The commit that introduced the problem in the third hunk:
   42ad231338c14 arm64: dts: qcom: sdm845: Add second PCIe PHY and 
controller
This first landed in v5.7 also

Re: Old commit back-port

[Greg KH]

On Wed, May 01, 2024 at 02:50:05PM -0500, Alex Elder wrote:
> This commit landed in Linux v5.16, and should have been back-ported
> to stable branches:
>   0ac10b291bee8 arm64: dts: qcom: Fix 'interrupt-map' parent address cells
> 
> It has three hunks, and the commit can be cherry-picked directly
> into the 5.15.y and 5.10.y stable branches.  The first hunk fixes
> a problem first introduced in Linux v5.2, so that hunk (only) should
> be back-ported to v5.4.y.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>
> 
> Is there anything further I need to do?  If you'd prefer I send
> patches, I can do that also (just ask).  Thanks.
> 
> 					-Alex
> 
> 
> Rob's original fix in Linus' tree:
>   0ac10b291bee8 arm64: dts: qcom: Fix 'interrupt-map' parent address cells
> This first landed in v5.16.
> 
> The commit that introduced the problem in the first hunk:
>   b84dfd175c098 arm64: dts: qcom: msm8998: Add PCIe PHY and RC nodes
> This first landed in v5.2, so back-port to v5.4.y, v5.10.y, v5.15.y.
> 
> The commit that introduced the problem in the second hunk:
>   5c538e09cb19b arm64: dts: qcom: sdm845: Add first PCIe controller and PHY
> This first landed in v5.7, so back-port to v5.10.y, v5.15.y
> 
> The commit that introduced the problem in the third hunk:
>   42ad231338c14 arm64: dts: qcom: sdm845: Add second PCIe PHY and controller
> This first landed in v5.7 also
> 
> 
> 

I'm confused, I applied this to 5.10.y and 5.15.y now, but it did not
apply to 5.4.y, and I did not understand the "first-third" type comments
about hunks here, sorry.  Can you just provide a working backport for
5.4.y?

thanks,

greg k-h

Re: Old commit back-port

[Alex Elder]

On 5/13/24 8:01 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, May 01, 2024 at 02:50:05PM -0500, Alex Elder wrote:
>> This commit landed in Linux v5.16, and should have been back-ported
>> to stable branches:
>>    0ac10b291bee8 arm64: dts: qcom: Fix 'interrupt-map' parent address cells
>>
>> It has three hunks, and the commit can be cherry-picked directly
>> into the 5.15.y and 5.10.y stable branches.  The first hunk fixes
>> a problem first introduced in Linux v5.2, so that hunk (only) should
>> be back-ported to v5.4.y.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>
>>
>> Is there anything further I need to do?  If you'd prefer I send
>> patches, I can do that also (just ask).  Thanks.
>>
>> 					-Alex
>>
>>
>> Rob's original fix in Linus' tree:
>>    0ac10b291bee8 arm64: dts: qcom: Fix 'interrupt-map' parent address cells
>> This first landed in v5.16.
>>
>> The commit that introduced the problem in the first hunk:
>>    b84dfd175c098 arm64: dts: qcom: msm8998: Add PCIe PHY and RC nodes
>> This first landed in v5.2, so back-port to v5.4.y, v5.10.y, v5.15.y.
>>
>> The commit that introduced the problem in the second hunk:
>>    5c538e09cb19b arm64: dts: qcom: sdm845: Add first PCIe controller and PHY
>> This first landed in v5.7, so back-port to v5.10.y, v5.15.y
>>
>> The commit that introduced the problem in the third hunk:
>>    42ad231338c14 arm64: dts: qcom: sdm845: Add second PCIe PHY and controller
>> This first landed in v5.7 also
>>
>>
>>
> 
> I'm confused, I applied this to 5.10.y and 5.15.y now, but it did not
> apply to 5.4.y, and I did not understand the "first-third" type comments
> about hunks here, sorry.  Can you just provide a working backport for
> 5.4.y?

Yes, I will.  It might be a few days.	-Alex

> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h