From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Ronnie Sahlberg <rsahlberg@ciq.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: commits for stable 2024-05-11
Date: Tue, 14 May 2024 14:11:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2024051443-chant-duffel-8529@gregkh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAK4epfxK+6otyj-N5mdQuPtPAKtqJzc2vUgBS+_idHDL_Lf=0A@mail.gmail.com>
On Sun, May 12, 2024 at 06:35:05PM -0400, Ronnie Sahlberg wrote:
> On Sun, May 12, 2024 at 8:21 AM Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, May 11, 2024 at 09:13:25PM -0400, Ronnie Sahlberg wrote:
> > > Please find attached a report generated by keyword matching commits
> > > from upstream that may be suitable for stable and probably as CVEs as
> > > well.
> >
> > This is great, thanks for looking into this and sending this out!
> >
> > > I exclude commits that are already tagged with CC stable in upstream
> > > and also commits already in
> > > stable/linux-rolling-stable.
> >
> > I took a very short look, and just picked one commit at random on the
> > bottom of the list:
> > cf2df0080bd59cb97a15
> >
> > And it's included in 6.8.2 already, as commit `0 ("wifi:
> > ath11k: fix a possible dead lock caused by ab->base_lock").
> >
> > So is your tooling working?
>
> Thankyou.
> Ah, the marking of which upstream commit that stable uses is not consistent.
> That one (and another ~150) used the form :
> "^ [ Upstream commit cf2df0080bd59cb97a1519ddefaf59788febdaa5 ]"
> and my regex did not accept that.
> I have changed the regex to be more permissive in detecting what is a
> reference to an upstream commit
> and it should be detecting this varient correctly now.
>
>
> >
> > Also, give us a chance to catch up on commits that are in Linus's tree,
> > but not in a -rc release, which you list a few at the top of the list.
> > We aren't allowed to apply them until after they hit a -rc release.
>
> I see.
> So we should not backporting anything more recent than the most recent
> tag in upstream master?
> Ok. I have done that change to fix that.
>
> Please find attached a new version of the report.
> I also change the format slightly on how the commits are listed so
> that it IMO becomes easier to read
> and check for specific types of hits.
>
> I have attached an updated scan with
> 1, fix for being more tolerant when detecting commit references
> 2, stops scanning at the most recent tag in upstream master
>
> Once this format of the report is in a good shape and we sort out all
> the bugs in it
> I can set it up to scan and automatically post to the list once a week or so.
Thanks, I'll look at this later this week after this latest round of -rc
releases are out.
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-14 12:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-12 1:13 commits for stable 2024-05-11 Ronnie Sahlberg
2024-05-12 12:21 ` Greg KH
2024-05-12 22:35 ` Ronnie Sahlberg
2024-05-14 12:11 ` Greg KH [this message]
2024-05-14 12:13 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2024051443-chant-duffel-8529@gregkh \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=rsahlberg@ciq.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox