From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.8]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 54E731BF31; Tue, 21 May 2024 05:15:30 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.8 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1716268531; cv=none; b=n+zWvu0XYtYaAsLj/hjyt+Fh3zvbqQ7Ev8YnoL+pWHvcTR8FgWigpeg7qP7R3A1FEnzYpjirFeibdZj3HUl7Nr3HUmZl2oW2oZ7B0uiC3ehDgezfdQdw8jqiM59YZXFPBnVU8pymBG70pXLRe+uqQRjFL1GNrQ92+H+1Nt/PBd4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1716268531; c=relaxed/simple; bh=vFv6DJQbTNFYud7DjAOJ9Oiu/jUCZI9/sQAgG3QA0sc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=nJ5k5YZKh6z9SC67zM6QcvJnACqeGv8vQuNMWCVmgOXqlZiYTc3uLdlZWYd4eThNwXDaLAVc5uKHpVJ+bx3M/i3c7mmripomaJlrKWjfSXp45Kwtk71daHHfREz75ocpygLilzsbQnB/3ndfopOl+zVIKvtJikoclpsZ/KGO0pQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=gzrO7glz; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.8 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="gzrO7glz" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1716268531; x=1747804531; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=vFv6DJQbTNFYud7DjAOJ9Oiu/jUCZI9/sQAgG3QA0sc=; b=gzrO7glztyyA2exFIQGMCLlxNU1z6/Z4Cty1KZ0ts/tc0K2pjNMVQwzp MrKrQTCd0iydVWPNTIH6mpVzwnLMJ/QzJOWdk4RisZjqoUbpGGd2Kx+yO 2PoNflUBTmdCC3xqg+eMJ8aKbgdjODIqdVob0tJQ8jI1JaLjIxEhheBOl w3YTzgz/XeTHdsXSRgHZw/oyQXZCu7A2rWe+aIIXVIyeJloGE314IehTX Jh4RMyGPJQYtW95UfkqhESRYiSBojOZ5Vhnb8AJu9Exg3RmDPPn993NzV rgh2rTMYp+cfUctp6DgAHRjo/7FdDHEl0kViZaVui3IBK+WK6V4XInHn5 g==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: zuOhdeWRSIe4zDJ+ixQa/w== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 7XlTP8jfTwywCU0j3luDVQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,11078"; a="29958977" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.08,176,1712646000"; d="scan'208";a="29958977" Received: from fmviesa003.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.143]) by fmvoesa102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 20 May 2024 22:15:30 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: wYlcXpOhRMagvsD64nYFdQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 6GmCX/kFRM6fGEXleLbasQ== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.08,176,1712646000"; d="scan'208";a="37313660" Received: from black.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.28]) by fmviesa003.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 20 May 2024 22:15:26 -0700 Received: by black.fi.intel.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 8F675179; Tue, 21 May 2024 08:15:25 +0300 (EEST) Date: Tue, 21 May 2024 08:15:25 +0300 From: Mika Westerberg To: Gia Cc: Mario Limonciello , Christian Heusel , Linux regressions mailing list , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "stable@vger.kernel.org" , "kernel@micha.zone" , Andreas Noever , Michael Jamet , Yehezkel Bernat , "linux-usb@vger.kernel.org" , Benjamin =?utf-8?Q?B=C3=B6hmke?= , "S, Sanath" Subject: Re: [REGRESSION][BISECTED] "xHCI host controller not responding, assume dead" on stable kernel > 6.8.7 Message-ID: <20240521051525.GL1421138@black.fi.intel.com> References: <38de0776-3adf-4223-b8e0-cedb5a5ebf4d@leemhuis.info> <611f8200-8e0e-40e4-aff4-cc2c55dc6354@amd.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Hi, On Mon, May 20, 2024 at 05:57:42PM +0200, Gia wrote: > Hi Mario, > > In my case in both cases the value for: > > $ cat /sys/bus/thunderbolt/devices/domain0/iommu_dma_protection > > is 0. > > Output of sudo journalctl -k with kernel option thunderbolt.dyndbg=+p: > https://codeshare.io/qAXLoj > > Output of sudo dmesg with kernel option thunderbolt.dyndbg=+p: > https://codeshare.io/zlPgRb I see you have "pcie_aspm=off" in the kernel command line. That kind of affects things. Can you drop that and see if it changes anything? And also provide a new full dmesg with "thunderbolt.dyndbg=+p" in the command line (dropping pcie_aspm_off)? Also is there any particular reason you have it there?