From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BAD0A73174; Tue, 21 May 2024 11:29:19 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.9 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1716290961; cv=none; b=XbQOZhnbES+IEYY5KgZDQ57rDGVS3ikFALzXbScp3Gk/qq2YaMPbd6FE+rBHNEe0oEO4RyDEBBxO0LJJI9bbDPqqdpc9WOhZn12XbcwJo5ik+/U8Rsc6Hg3pKeGZ5fTfn0zUR5ycxiscYjiyvHnqhICZZ0yjkFiB2j4xK1CuSpM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1716290961; c=relaxed/simple; bh=9UyG8NR2nB4nFh3V+pbEi6yVtB+rOBjbai89rumi9dU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=nJhHh4BtdGgLI+kHTyNxeo9vkMi6jDJN9x1q0V918tCrS0x7IYcmsrwrrx0WNAERsDBbkpP6Ca2KoyAC82wftxvsUsqXN2piG9Lp19FEN0eGK2//bhV13gqV7km6nzeblQPLghBd42Ohc2+kCK9j/2c/T4Pv38v0+v4chT9HKkA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=DFDQ/6M4; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.9 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="DFDQ/6M4" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1716290960; x=1747826960; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=9UyG8NR2nB4nFh3V+pbEi6yVtB+rOBjbai89rumi9dU=; b=DFDQ/6M4ei/FLuIYgrdaGiu4KFWHbYsTSKi9K7BRAW7JqzB8IuXT4DDS H0AFJZJhBhJ9Wez4qfqIxwEPW1dZCIZvAI+drH1fTIFpHVnH5rzQKvjur TEif52BvIcYJH8bYNTvIqORDWqJg9ymqV5QsefJ9vYo5rfK3qHVYl8wPy 7Tomw6TdL7oJfrz6HqRM9AVGXiSTxK3rzJu4VLFuWkoawHhvCfwk5IiY+ IzdHpzbWqFI6CUVuq8p8Q5zbAFAsro/8rnj38MjAUpOhXy+EykRgX5A1E /OOkdDG94k3Kejjzl9Gmx12vAIlOfQogfEwo9iZqXtL9NDJN622cUnRbZ g==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: CWvuyZOtT5KNugreJYGzWA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: +9wMWUlGSpe/SLQoqKoUyw== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,11078"; a="23145733" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.08,177,1712646000"; d="scan'208";a="23145733" Received: from fmviesa005.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.145]) by fmvoesa103.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 21 May 2024 04:29:19 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: p/A6XjsLRyiWx1rx3gursw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: RQLoNqTiQfabFqgjd56z0g== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.08,177,1712646000"; d="scan'208";a="37275244" Received: from black.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.28]) by fmviesa005.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 21 May 2024 04:29:16 -0700 Received: by black.fi.intel.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 4AF2917F; Tue, 21 May 2024 14:29:15 +0300 (EEST) Date: Tue, 21 May 2024 14:29:15 +0300 From: Mika Westerberg To: Gia Cc: Mario Limonciello , Christian Heusel , Linux regressions mailing list , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "stable@vger.kernel.org" , "kernel@micha.zone" , Andreas Noever , Michael Jamet , Yehezkel Bernat , "linux-usb@vger.kernel.org" , Benjamin =?utf-8?Q?B=C3=B6hmke?= , "S, Sanath" Subject: Re: [REGRESSION][BISECTED] "xHCI host controller not responding, assume dead" on stable kernel > 6.8.7 Message-ID: <20240521112915.GQ1421138@black.fi.intel.com> References: <38de0776-3adf-4223-b8e0-cedb5a5ebf4d@leemhuis.info> <611f8200-8e0e-40e4-aff4-cc2c55dc6354@amd.com> <20240521051525.GL1421138@black.fi.intel.com> <20240521085501.GN1421138@black.fi.intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Tue, May 21, 2024 at 11:24:56AM +0200, Gia wrote: > Thank you for your suggestion Mika, as a general rule I totally agree > with you and I do not mess with kernel default parameters, but I > remember "pcie_aspm=off" was necessary at the time I set up the > system. Probably a kernel or a BIOS update makes it unnecessary today. Okay, thanks. > I see it removes these messages from my logs but I trust you when you > say they have not an impact on functionality: > > May 21 11:01:36 um773arch kernel: pcieport 0000:05:04.0: Unable to > change power state from D3hot to D0, device inaccessible > May 21 11:01:36 um773arch kernel: igb 0000:09:00.0 eth0: PCIe link lost > May 21 11:01:36 um773arch kernel: xhci_hcd 0000:08:00.0: xHCI host > controller not responding, assume dead > May 21 11:01:36 um773arch kernel: xhci_hcd 0000:07:00.0: xHCI host > controller not responding, assume dead Correct these are side-effect of the USB4 topology reset we do. As explained earlier the tunnels get re-established and the devices will come back soon after this.