From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: mm-commits@vger.kernel.org,stable@vger.kernel.org,sjb7183@psu.edu,konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com,akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: + nilfs2-fix-unexpected-freezing-of-nilfs_segctor_sync.patch added to mm-hotfixes-unstable branch
Date: Tue, 21 May 2024 16:38:36 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240521233836.9067BC2BD11@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
The patch titled
Subject: nilfs2: fix unexpected freezing of nilfs_segctor_sync()
has been added to the -mm mm-hotfixes-unstable branch. Its filename is
nilfs2-fix-unexpected-freezing-of-nilfs_segctor_sync.patch
This patch will shortly appear at
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/25-new.git/tree/patches/nilfs2-fix-unexpected-freezing-of-nilfs_segctor_sync.patch
This patch will later appear in the mm-hotfixes-unstable branch at
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's
*** Remember to use Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst when testing your code ***
The -mm tree is included into linux-next via the mm-everything
branch at git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
and is updated there every 2-3 working days
------------------------------------------------------
From: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com>
Subject: nilfs2: fix unexpected freezing of nilfs_segctor_sync()
Date: Mon, 20 May 2024 22:26:20 +0900
A potential and reproducible race issue has been identified where
nilfs_segctor_sync() would block even after the log writer thread writes a
checkpoint, unless there is an interrupt or other trigger to resume log
writing.
This turned out to be because, depending on the execution timing of the
log writer thread running in parallel, the log writer thread may skip
responding to nilfs_segctor_sync(), which causes a call to schedule()
waiting for completion within nilfs_segctor_sync() to lose the opportunity
to wake up.
The reason why waking up the task waiting in nilfs_segctor_sync() may be
skipped is that updating the request generation issued using a shared
sequence counter and adding an wait queue entry to the request wait queue
to the log writer, are not done atomically. There is a possibility that
log writing and request completion notification by nilfs_segctor_wakeup()
may occur between the two operations, and in that case, the wait queue
entry is not yet visible to nilfs_segctor_wakeup() and the wake-up of
nilfs_segctor_sync() will be carried over until the next request occurs.
Fix this issue by performing these two operations simultaneously within
the lock section of sc_state_lock. Also, following the memory barrier
guidelines for event waiting loops, move the call to set_current_state()
in the same location into the event waiting loop to ensure that a memory
barrier is inserted just before the event condition determination.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240520132621.4054-3-konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com
Fixes: 9ff05123e3bf ("nilfs2: segment constructor")
Signed-off-by: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: "Bai, Shuangpeng" <sjb7183@psu.edu>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---
fs/nilfs2/segment.c | 17 +++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
--- a/fs/nilfs2/segment.c~nilfs2-fix-unexpected-freezing-of-nilfs_segctor_sync
+++ a/fs/nilfs2/segment.c
@@ -2168,19 +2168,28 @@ static int nilfs_segctor_sync(struct nil
struct nilfs_segctor_wait_request wait_req;
int err = 0;
- spin_lock(&sci->sc_state_lock);
init_wait(&wait_req.wq);
wait_req.err = 0;
atomic_set(&wait_req.done, 0);
+ init_waitqueue_entry(&wait_req.wq, current);
+
+ /*
+ * To prevent a race issue where completion notifications from the
+ * log writer thread are missed, increment the request sequence count
+ * "sc_seq_request" and insert a wait queue entry using the current
+ * sequence number into the "sc_wait_request" queue at the same time
+ * within the lock section of "sc_state_lock".
+ */
+ spin_lock(&sci->sc_state_lock);
wait_req.seq = ++sci->sc_seq_request;
+ add_wait_queue(&sci->sc_wait_request, &wait_req.wq);
spin_unlock(&sci->sc_state_lock);
- init_waitqueue_entry(&wait_req.wq, current);
- add_wait_queue(&sci->sc_wait_request, &wait_req.wq);
- set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
wake_up(&sci->sc_wait_daemon);
for (;;) {
+ set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
+
if (atomic_read(&wait_req.done)) {
err = wait_req.err;
break;
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com are
nilfs2-fix-use-after-free-of-timer-for-log-writer-thread.patch
nilfs2-fix-unexpected-freezing-of-nilfs_segctor_sync.patch
nilfs2-fix-potential-hang-in-nilfs_detach_log_writer.patch
reply other threads:[~2024-05-21 23:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240521233836.9067BC2BD11@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com \
--cc=mm-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sjb7183@psu.edu \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox