From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
patches@lists.linux.dev, "stable@vger.kernel.org,
George Guo" <guodongtai@kylinos.cn>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
"Steven Rostedt (VMware)" <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
George Guo <guodongtai@kylinos.cn>
Subject: [PATCH 4.19 08/18] tracing: Consolidate trace_add/remove_event_call back to the nolock functions
Date: Thu, 23 May 2024 15:12:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240523130326.048256449@linuxfoundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240523130325.727602650@linuxfoundation.org>
4.19-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: "Steven Rostedt (VMware)" <rostedt@goodmis.org>
commit 7e1413edd6194a9807aa5f3ac0378b9b4b9da879 upstream.
The trace_add/remove_event_call_nolock() functions were added to allow
the tace_add/remove_event_call() code be called when the event_mutex
lock was already taken. Now that all callers are done within the
event_mutex, there's no reason to have two different interfaces.
Remove the current wrapper trace_add/remove_event_call()s and rename the
_nolock versions back to the original names.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/154140866955.17322.2081425494660638846.stgit@devbox
Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: George Guo <guodongtai@kylinos.cn>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
include/linux/trace_events.h | 2 --
kernel/trace/trace_events.c | 30 ++++--------------------------
kernel/trace/trace_events_hist.c | 6 +++---
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
--- a/include/linux/trace_events.h
+++ b/include/linux/trace_events.h
@@ -529,8 +529,6 @@ extern int trace_event_raw_init(struct t
extern int trace_define_field(struct trace_event_call *call, const char *type,
const char *name, int offset, int size,
int is_signed, int filter_type);
-extern int trace_add_event_call_nolock(struct trace_event_call *call);
-extern int trace_remove_event_call_nolock(struct trace_event_call *call);
extern int trace_add_event_call(struct trace_event_call *call);
extern int trace_remove_event_call(struct trace_event_call *call);
extern int trace_event_get_offsets(struct trace_event_call *call);
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_events.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_events.c
@@ -2312,7 +2312,8 @@ __trace_early_add_new_event(struct trace
struct ftrace_module_file_ops;
static void __add_event_to_tracers(struct trace_event_call *call);
-int trace_add_event_call_nolock(struct trace_event_call *call)
+/* Add an additional event_call dynamically */
+int trace_add_event_call(struct trace_event_call *call)
{
int ret;
lockdep_assert_held(&event_mutex);
@@ -2327,17 +2328,6 @@ int trace_add_event_call_nolock(struct t
return ret;
}
-/* Add an additional event_call dynamically */
-int trace_add_event_call(struct trace_event_call *call)
-{
- int ret;
-
- mutex_lock(&event_mutex);
- ret = trace_add_event_call_nolock(call);
- mutex_unlock(&event_mutex);
- return ret;
-}
-
/*
* Must be called under locking of trace_types_lock, event_mutex and
* trace_event_sem.
@@ -2383,8 +2373,8 @@ static int probe_remove_event_call(struc
return 0;
}
-/* no event_mutex version */
-int trace_remove_event_call_nolock(struct trace_event_call *call)
+/* Remove an event_call */
+int trace_remove_event_call(struct trace_event_call *call)
{
int ret;
@@ -2398,18 +2388,6 @@ int trace_remove_event_call_nolock(struc
return ret;
}
-
-/* Remove an event_call */
-int trace_remove_event_call(struct trace_event_call *call)
-{
- int ret;
-
- mutex_lock(&event_mutex);
- ret = trace_remove_event_call_nolock(call);
- mutex_unlock(&event_mutex);
-
- return ret;
-}
#define for_each_event(event, start, end) \
for (event = start; \
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_events_hist.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_events_hist.c
@@ -980,7 +980,7 @@ static int register_synth_event(struct s
call->data = event;
call->tp = event->tp;
- ret = trace_add_event_call_nolock(call);
+ ret = trace_add_event_call(call);
if (ret) {
pr_warn("Failed to register synthetic event: %s\n",
trace_event_name(call));
@@ -989,7 +989,7 @@ static int register_synth_event(struct s
ret = set_synth_event_print_fmt(call);
if (ret < 0) {
- trace_remove_event_call_nolock(call);
+ trace_remove_event_call(call);
goto err;
}
out:
@@ -1004,7 +1004,7 @@ static int unregister_synth_event(struct
struct trace_event_call *call = &event->call;
int ret;
- ret = trace_remove_event_call_nolock(call);
+ ret = trace_remove_event_call(call);
return ret;
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-23 13:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-23 13:12 [PATCH 4.19 00/18] 4.19.315-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-05-23 13:12 ` [PATCH 4.19 01/18] Revert "selftests: mm: fix map_hugetlb failure on 64K page size systems" Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-05-23 13:12 ` [PATCH 4.19 02/18] dm: limit the number of targets and parameter size area Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-05-23 13:12 ` [PATCH 4.19 03/18] btrfs: add missing mutex_unlock in btrfs_relocate_sys_chunks() Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-05-23 13:12 ` [PATCH 4.19 04/18] tracing: Simplify creation and deletion of synthetic events Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-05-23 13:12 ` [PATCH 4.19 05/18] tracing: Add unified dynamic event framework Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-05-23 13:12 ` [PATCH 4.19 06/18] tracing: Use dyn_event framework for synthetic events Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-05-23 13:12 ` [PATCH 4.19 07/18] tracing: Remove unneeded synth_event_mutex Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-05-23 13:12 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2024-05-23 13:12 ` [PATCH 4.19 09/18] string.h: Add str_has_prefix() helper function Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-05-23 13:12 ` [PATCH 4.19 10/18] tracing: Use str_has_prefix() helper for histogram code Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-05-23 13:12 ` [PATCH 4.19 11/18] tracing: Use str_has_prefix() instead of using fixed sizes Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-05-23 13:12 ` [PATCH 4.19 12/18] tracing: Have the historgram use the result of str_has_prefix() for len of prefix Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-05-23 13:12 ` [PATCH 4.19 13/18] tracing: Refactor hist trigger action code Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-05-23 13:12 ` [PATCH 4.19 14/18] tracing: Split up onmatch action data Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-05-23 13:12 ` [PATCH 4.19 15/18] tracing: Generalize hist trigger onmax and save action Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-05-23 13:12 ` [PATCH 4.19 16/18] tracing: Remove unnecessary var_ref destroy in track_data_destroy() Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-05-23 13:12 ` [PATCH 4.19 17/18] serial: kgdboc: Fix NMI-safety problems from keyboard reset code Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-05-23 13:12 ` [PATCH 4.19 18/18] docs: kernel_include.py: Cope with docutils 0.21 Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-05-24 6:55 ` [PATCH 4.19 00/18] 4.19.315-rc1 review Harshit Mogalapalli
2024-05-24 11:23 ` Pavel Machek
2024-05-24 13:46 ` Anders Roxell
2024-05-24 15:19 ` Jon Hunter
2024-05-24 16:26 ` Shuah Khan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240523130326.048256449@linuxfoundation.org \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=guodongtai@kylinos.cn \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox