* Re: [PATCH] f2fs: fix false alarm on invalid block address
[not found] ` <Zk-AilUqViUaLj8b@google.com>
@ 2024-05-23 17:46 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2024-05-25 15:09 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jaegeuk Kim @ 2024-05-23 17:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: stable, linux-f2fs-devel, Greg Kroah-Hartman; +Cc: stable, Chao Yu
Fixed the stable mailing list.
On 05/23, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> Could you please consider to cherry-pick this patch in stable-6.9, since
> there are many users suffering from unnecessary fsck runs during boot?
>
> You can get this from Linus's tree by
> (b864ddb57eb0 "f2fs: fix false alarm on invalid block address")
>
> Thanks,
>
> On 05/20, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > f2fs_ra_meta_pages can try to read ahead on invalid block address which is
> > not the corruption case.
> >
> > Cc: <stable@kernel.org> # v6.9+
> > Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218770
> > Fixes: 31f85ccc84b8 ("f2fs: unify the error handling of f2fs_is_valid_blkaddr")
> > Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
> > ---
> > fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c | 9 +++++----
> > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c b/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
> > index 5d05a413f451..55d444bec5c0 100644
> > --- a/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
> > +++ b/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
> > @@ -179,22 +179,22 @@ static bool __f2fs_is_valid_blkaddr(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> > break;
> > case META_SIT:
> > if (unlikely(blkaddr >= SIT_BLK_CNT(sbi)))
> > - goto err;
> > + goto check_only;
> > break;
> > case META_SSA:
> > if (unlikely(blkaddr >= MAIN_BLKADDR(sbi) ||
> > blkaddr < SM_I(sbi)->ssa_blkaddr))
> > - goto err;
> > + goto check_only;
> > break;
> > case META_CP:
> > if (unlikely(blkaddr >= SIT_I(sbi)->sit_base_addr ||
> > blkaddr < __start_cp_addr(sbi)))
> > - goto err;
> > + goto check_only;
> > break;
> > case META_POR:
> > if (unlikely(blkaddr >= MAX_BLKADDR(sbi) ||
> > blkaddr < MAIN_BLKADDR(sbi)))
> > - goto err;
> > + goto check_only;
> > break;
> > case DATA_GENERIC:
> > case DATA_GENERIC_ENHANCE:
> > @@ -228,6 +228,7 @@ static bool __f2fs_is_valid_blkaddr(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> > return true;
> > err:
> > f2fs_handle_error(sbi, ERROR_INVALID_BLKADDR);
> > +check_only:
> > return false;
> > }
> >
> > --
> > 2.45.0.rc1.225.g2a3ae87e7f-goog
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] f2fs: fix false alarm on invalid block address
2024-05-23 17:46 ` [PATCH] f2fs: fix false alarm on invalid block address Jaegeuk Kim
@ 2024-05-25 15:09 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman @ 2024-05-25 15:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jaegeuk Kim; +Cc: stable, linux-f2fs-devel, stable, Chao Yu
On Thu, May 23, 2024 at 05:46:46PM +0000, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> Fixed the stable mailing list.
>
> On 05/23, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > Hi Greg,
> >
> > Could you please consider to cherry-pick this patch in stable-6.9, since
> > there are many users suffering from unnecessary fsck runs during boot?
> >
> > You can get this from Linus's tree by
> > (b864ddb57eb0 "f2fs: fix false alarm on invalid block address")
Now queued up, thanks.
greg k-h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-05-25 15:09 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20240520220208.1596727-1-jaegeuk@kernel.org>
[not found] ` <Zk-AilUqViUaLj8b@google.com>
2024-05-23 17:46 ` [PATCH] f2fs: fix false alarm on invalid block address Jaegeuk Kim
2024-05-25 15:09 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox