From: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>
To: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>,
Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>,
Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
Jian-Hong Pan <jhp@endlessos.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] ata: ahci: Do not enable LPM if no LPM states are supported by the HBA
Date: Fri, 31 May 2024 14:07:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240531120711.660691-2-cassel@kernel.org> (raw)
LPM consists of HIPM (host initiated power management) and DIPM
(device initiated power management).
ata_eh_set_lpm() will only enable HIPM if both the HBA and the device
supports it.
However, DIPM will be enabled as long as the device supports it.
The HBA will later reject the device's request to enter a power state
that it does not support (Slumber/Partial/DevSleep) (DevSleep is never
initiated by the device).
For a HBA that doesn't support any LPM states, simply don't set a LPM
policy such that all the HIPM/DIPM probing/enabling will be skipped.
Not enabling HIPM or DIPM in the first place is safer than relying on
the device following the AHCI specification and respecting the NAK.
(There are comments in the code that some devices misbehave when
receiving a NAK.)
Performing this check in ahci_update_initial_lpm_policy() also has the
advantage that a HBA that doesn't support any LPM states will take the
exact same code paths as a port that is external/hot plug capable.
Fixes: 7627a0edef54 ("ata: ahci: Drop low power policy board type")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>
---
We have not received any bug reports with this.
The devices that were quirked recently all supported both Partial and
Slumber.
This is more a defensive action, as it seems unnecessary to enable DIPM
in the first place, if the HBA doesn't support any LPM states.
drivers/ata/ahci.c | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/ata/ahci.c b/drivers/ata/ahci.c
index 07d66d2c5f0d..214de08de642 100644
--- a/drivers/ata/ahci.c
+++ b/drivers/ata/ahci.c
@@ -1735,6 +1735,12 @@ static void ahci_update_initial_lpm_policy(struct ata_port *ap)
if (ap->pflags & ATA_PFLAG_EXTERNAL)
return;
+ /* If no LPM states are supported by the HBA, do not bother with LPM */
+ if ((ap->host->flags & ATA_HOST_NO_PART) &&
+ (ap->host->flags & ATA_HOST_NO_SSC) &&
+ (ap->host->flags & ATA_HOST_NO_DEVSLP))
+ return;
+
/* user modified policy via module param */
if (mobile_lpm_policy != -1) {
policy = mobile_lpm_policy;
--
2.45.1
next reply other threads:[~2024-05-31 12:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-31 12:07 Niklas Cassel [this message]
2024-06-01 5:20 ` [PATCH] ata: ahci: Do not enable LPM if no LPM states are supported by the HBA Mika Westerberg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240531120711.660691-2-cassel@kernel.org \
--to=cassel@kernel.org \
--cc=dlemoal@kernel.org \
--cc=jhp@endlessos.org \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
--cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox