public inbox for stable@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: mm-commits@vger.kernel.org,stable@vger.kernel.org,konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com,akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: [merged mm-hotfixes-stable] nilfs2-fix-potential-kernel-bug-due-to-lack-of-writeback-flag-waiting.patch removed from -mm tree
Date: Wed, 05 Jun 2024 19:20:09 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240606022010.116CEC4AF09@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)


The quilt patch titled
     Subject: nilfs2: fix potential kernel bug due to lack of writeback flag waiting
has been removed from the -mm tree.  Its filename was
     nilfs2-fix-potential-kernel-bug-due-to-lack-of-writeback-flag-waiting.patch

This patch was dropped because it was merged into the mm-hotfixes-stable branch
of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm

------------------------------------------------------
From: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com>
Subject: nilfs2: fix potential kernel bug due to lack of writeback flag waiting
Date: Thu, 30 May 2024 23:15:56 +0900

Destructive writes to a block device on which nilfs2 is mounted can cause
a kernel bug in the folio/page writeback start routine or writeback end
routine (__folio_start_writeback in the log below):

 kernel BUG at mm/page-writeback.c:3070!
 Oops: invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN PTI
 ...
 RIP: 0010:__folio_start_writeback+0xbaa/0x10e0
 Code: 25 ff 0f 00 00 0f 84 18 01 00 00 e8 40 ca c6 ff e9 17 f6 ff ff
  e8 36 ca c6 ff 4c 89 f7 48 c7 c6 80 c0 12 84 e8 e7 b3 0f 00 90 <0f>
  0b e8 1f ca c6 ff 4c 89 f7 48 c7 c6 a0 c6 12 84 e8 d0 b3 0f 00
 ...
 Call Trace:
  <TASK>
  nilfs_segctor_do_construct+0x4654/0x69d0 [nilfs2]
  nilfs_segctor_construct+0x181/0x6b0 [nilfs2]
  nilfs_segctor_thread+0x548/0x11c0 [nilfs2]
  kthread+0x2f0/0x390
  ret_from_fork+0x4b/0x80
  ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30
  </TASK>

This is because when the log writer starts a writeback for segment summary
blocks or a super root block that use the backing device's page cache, it
does not wait for the ongoing folio/page writeback, resulting in an
inconsistent writeback state.

Fix this issue by waiting for ongoing writebacks when putting
folios/pages on the backing device into writeback state.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240530141556.4411-1-konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com
Fixes: 9ff05123e3bf ("nilfs2: segment constructor")
Signed-off-by: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---

 fs/nilfs2/segment.c |    3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

--- a/fs/nilfs2/segment.c~nilfs2-fix-potential-kernel-bug-due-to-lack-of-writeback-flag-waiting
+++ a/fs/nilfs2/segment.c
@@ -1652,6 +1652,7 @@ static void nilfs_segctor_prepare_write(
 			if (bh->b_folio != bd_folio) {
 				if (bd_folio) {
 					folio_lock(bd_folio);
+					folio_wait_writeback(bd_folio);
 					folio_clear_dirty_for_io(bd_folio);
 					folio_start_writeback(bd_folio);
 					folio_unlock(bd_folio);
@@ -1665,6 +1666,7 @@ static void nilfs_segctor_prepare_write(
 			if (bh == segbuf->sb_super_root) {
 				if (bh->b_folio != bd_folio) {
 					folio_lock(bd_folio);
+					folio_wait_writeback(bd_folio);
 					folio_clear_dirty_for_io(bd_folio);
 					folio_start_writeback(bd_folio);
 					folio_unlock(bd_folio);
@@ -1681,6 +1683,7 @@ static void nilfs_segctor_prepare_write(
 	}
 	if (bd_folio) {
 		folio_lock(bd_folio);
+		folio_wait_writeback(bd_folio);
 		folio_clear_dirty_for_io(bd_folio);
 		folio_start_writeback(bd_folio);
 		folio_unlock(bd_folio);
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com are



                 reply	other threads:[~2024-06-06  2:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240606022010.116CEC4AF09@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com \
    --cc=mm-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox