[PATCH 6.6 091/137] mm: /proc/pid/smaps_rollup: avoid skipping vma after getting mmap_lock again

[Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>]

6.6-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Yuanyuan Zhong <yzhong@purestorage.com>

commit 6d065f507d82307d6161ac75c025111fb8b08a46 upstream.

After switching smaps_rollup to use VMA iterator, searching for next entry
is part of the condition expression of the do-while loop.  So the current
VMA needs to be addressed before the continue statement.

Otherwise, with some VMAs skipped, userspace observed memory
consumption from /proc/pid/smaps_rollup will be smaller than the sum of
the corresponding fields from /proc/pid/smaps.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240523183531.2535436-1-yzhong@purestorage.com
Fixes: c4c84f06285e ("fs/proc/task_mmu: stop using linked list and highest_vm_end")
Signed-off-by: Yuanyuan Zhong <yzhong@purestorage.com>
Reviewed-by: Mohamed Khalfella <mkhalfella@purestorage.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 fs/proc/task_mmu.c |    9 +++++++--
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
+++ b/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
@@ -965,12 +965,17 @@ static int show_smaps_rollup(struct seq_
 				break;
 
 			/* Case 1 and 2 above */
-			if (vma->vm_start >= last_vma_end)
+			if (vma->vm_start >= last_vma_end) {
+				smap_gather_stats(vma, &mss, 0);
+				last_vma_end = vma->vm_end;
 				continue;
+			}
 
 			/* Case 4 above */
-			if (vma->vm_end > last_vma_end)
+			if (vma->vm_end > last_vma_end) {
 				smap_gather_stats(vma, &mss, last_vma_end);
+				last_vma_end = vma->vm_end;
+			}
 		}
 	} for_each_vma(vmi, vma);