Linux kernel -stable discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.19 5.4 5.10 5.15 6.1 6.6] nilfs2: fix potential kernel bug due to lack of writeback flag waiting
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2024 10:52:43 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2024061937-anaconda-justness-92fc@gregkh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240616181729.6672-1-konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com>

On Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 03:17:29AM +0900, Ryusuke Konishi wrote:
> commit a4ca369ca221bb7e06c725792ac107f0e48e82e7 upstream.
> 
> Destructive writes to a block device on which nilfs2 is mounted can cause
> a kernel bug in the folio/page writeback start routine or writeback end
> routine (__folio_start_writeback in the log below):
> 
>  kernel BUG at mm/page-writeback.c:3070!
>  Oops: invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN PTI
>  ...
>  RIP: 0010:__folio_start_writeback+0xbaa/0x10e0
>  Code: 25 ff 0f 00 00 0f 84 18 01 00 00 e8 40 ca c6 ff e9 17 f6 ff ff
>   e8 36 ca c6 ff 4c 89 f7 48 c7 c6 80 c0 12 84 e8 e7 b3 0f 00 90 <0f>
>   0b e8 1f ca c6 ff 4c 89 f7 48 c7 c6 a0 c6 12 84 e8 d0 b3 0f 00
>  ...
>  Call Trace:
>   <TASK>
>   nilfs_segctor_do_construct+0x4654/0x69d0 [nilfs2]
>   nilfs_segctor_construct+0x181/0x6b0 [nilfs2]
>   nilfs_segctor_thread+0x548/0x11c0 [nilfs2]
>   kthread+0x2f0/0x390
>   ret_from_fork+0x4b/0x80
>   ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30
>   </TASK>
> 
> This is because when the log writer starts a writeback for segment summary
> blocks or a super root block that use the backing device's page cache, it
> does not wait for the ongoing folio/page writeback, resulting in an
> inconsistent writeback state.
> 
> Fix this issue by waiting for ongoing writebacks when putting
> folios/pages on the backing device into writeback state.
> 
> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240530141556.4411-1-konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com
> Fixes: 9ff05123e3bf ("nilfs2: segment constructor")
> Signed-off-by: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com>
> Tested-by: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com>
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> ---
> Please apply this patch to the stable trees indicated by the subject
> prefix instead of the patch that failed.
> 
> This patch is tailored to account for page/folio conversion and can
> be applied to v6.7 and earlier.
> 
> Also, all the builds and tests I did on each stable tree passed.

Now queued up, thanks.

greg k-h

      reply	other threads:[~2024-06-19  8:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-06-16 18:17 [PATCH 4.19 5.4 5.10 5.15 6.1 6.6] nilfs2: fix potential kernel bug due to lack of writeback flag waiting Ryusuke Konishi
2024-06-19  8:52 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2024061937-anaconda-justness-92fc@gregkh \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox