FAILED: patch "[PATCH] drm/amdgpu: fix deadlock while reading mqd from debugfs" failed to apply to 6.6-stable tree

[<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>]

The patch below does not apply to the 6.6-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.

To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:

git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.6.y
git checkout FETCH_HEAD
git cherry-pick -x c25d09bcb79fa6a6f45beb558ccc77e68f757e19
# <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.>
git commit -s
git send-email --to '<stable@vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2024061953-canteen-external-177f@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.6.y' HEAD^..

Possible dependencies:

c25d09bcb79f ("drm/amdgpu: fix deadlock while reading mqd from debugfs")

thanks,

greg k-h

------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------

From c25d09bcb79fa6a6f45beb558ccc77e68f757e19 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2024 17:07:37 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: fix deadlock while reading mqd from debugfs

An errant disk backup on my desktop got into debugfs and triggered the
following deadlock scenario in the amdgpu debugfs files. The machine
also hard-resets immediately after those lines are printed (although I
wasn't able to reproduce that part when reading by hand):

[ 1318.016074][ T1082] ======================================================
[ 1318.016607][ T1082] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
[ 1318.017107][ T1082] 6.8.0-rc7-00015-ge0c8221b72c0 #17 Not tainted
[ 1318.017598][ T1082] ------------------------------------------------------
[ 1318.018096][ T1082] tar/1082 is trying to acquire lock:
[ 1318.018585][ T1082] ffff98c44175d6a0 (&mm->mmap_lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: __might_fault+0x40/0x80
[ 1318.019084][ T1082]
[ 1318.019084][ T1082] but task is already holding lock:
[ 1318.020052][ T1082] ffff98c4c13f55f8 (reservation_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: amdgpu_debugfs_mqd_read+0x6a/0x250 [amdgpu]
[ 1318.020607][ T1082]
[ 1318.020607][ T1082] which lock already depends on the new lock.
[ 1318.020607][ T1082]
[ 1318.022081][ T1082]
[ 1318.022081][ T1082] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
[ 1318.023083][ T1082]
[ 1318.023083][ T1082] -> #2 (reservation_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
[ 1318.024114][ T1082]        __ww_mutex_lock.constprop.0+0xe0/0x12f0
[ 1318.024639][ T1082]        ww_mutex_lock+0x32/0x90
[ 1318.025161][ T1082]        dma_resv_lockdep+0x18a/0x330
[ 1318.025683][ T1082]        do_one_initcall+0x6a/0x350
[ 1318.026210][ T1082]        kernel_init_freeable+0x1a3/0x310
[ 1318.026728][ T1082]        kernel_init+0x15/0x1a0
[ 1318.027242][ T1082]        ret_from_fork+0x2c/0x40
[ 1318.027759][ T1082]        ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20
[ 1318.028281][ T1082]
[ 1318.028281][ T1082] -> #1 (reservation_ww_class_acquire){+.+.}-{0:0}:
[ 1318.029297][ T1082]        dma_resv_lockdep+0x16c/0x330
[ 1318.029790][ T1082]        do_one_initcall+0x6a/0x350
[ 1318.030263][ T1082]        kernel_init_freeable+0x1a3/0x310
[ 1318.030722][ T1082]        kernel_init+0x15/0x1a0
[ 1318.031168][ T1082]        ret_from_fork+0x2c/0x40
[ 1318.031598][ T1082]        ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20
[ 1318.032011][ T1082]
[ 1318.032011][ T1082] -> #0 (&mm->mmap_lock){++++}-{3:3}:
[ 1318.032778][ T1082]        __lock_acquire+0x14bf/0x2680
[ 1318.033141][ T1082]        lock_acquire+0xcd/0x2c0
[ 1318.033487][ T1082]        __might_fault+0x58/0x80
[ 1318.033814][ T1082]        amdgpu_debugfs_mqd_read+0x103/0x250 [amdgpu]
[ 1318.034181][ T1082]        full_proxy_read+0x55/0x80
[ 1318.034487][ T1082]        vfs_read+0xa7/0x360
[ 1318.034788][ T1082]        ksys_read+0x70/0xf0
[ 1318.035085][ T1082]        do_syscall_64+0x94/0x180
[ 1318.035375][ T1082]        entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0x4e
[ 1318.035664][ T1082]
[ 1318.035664][ T1082] other info that might help us debug this:
[ 1318.035664][ T1082]
[ 1318.036487][ T1082] Chain exists of:
[ 1318.036487][ T1082]   &mm->mmap_lock --> reservation_ww_class_acquire --> reservation_ww_class_mutex
[ 1318.036487][ T1082]
[ 1318.037310][ T1082]  Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[ 1318.037310][ T1082]
[ 1318.037838][ T1082]        CPU0                    CPU1
[ 1318.038101][ T1082]        ----                    ----
[ 1318.038350][ T1082]   lock(reservation_ww_class_mutex);
[ 1318.038590][ T1082]                                lock(reservation_ww_class_acquire);
[ 1318.038839][ T1082]                                lock(reservation_ww_class_mutex);
[ 1318.039083][ T1082]   rlock(&mm->mmap_lock);
[ 1318.039328][ T1082]
[ 1318.039328][ T1082]  *** DEADLOCK ***
[ 1318.039328][ T1082]
[ 1318.040029][ T1082] 1 lock held by tar/1082:
[ 1318.040259][ T1082]  #0: ffff98c4c13f55f8 (reservation_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: amdgpu_debugfs_mqd_read+0x6a/0x250 [amdgpu]
[ 1318.040560][ T1082]
[ 1318.040560][ T1082] stack backtrace:
[ 1318.041053][ T1082] CPU: 22 PID: 1082 Comm: tar Not tainted 6.8.0-rc7-00015-ge0c8221b72c0 #17 3316c85d50e282c5643b075d1f01a4f6365e39c2
[ 1318.041329][ T1082] Hardware name: Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. B650 AORUS PRO AX/B650 AORUS PRO AX, BIOS F20 12/14/2023
[ 1318.041614][ T1082] Call Trace:
[ 1318.041895][ T1082]  <TASK>
[ 1318.042175][ T1082]  dump_stack_lvl+0x4a/0x80
[ 1318.042460][ T1082]  check_noncircular+0x145/0x160
[ 1318.042743][ T1082]  __lock_acquire+0x14bf/0x2680
[ 1318.043022][ T1082]  lock_acquire+0xcd/0x2c0
[ 1318.043301][ T1082]  ? __might_fault+0x40/0x80
[ 1318.043580][ T1082]  ? __might_fault+0x40/0x80
[ 1318.043856][ T1082]  __might_fault+0x58/0x80
[ 1318.044131][ T1082]  ? __might_fault+0x40/0x80
[ 1318.044408][ T1082]  amdgpu_debugfs_mqd_read+0x103/0x250 [amdgpu 8fe2afaa910cbd7654c8cab23563a94d6caebaab]
[ 1318.044749][ T1082]  full_proxy_read+0x55/0x80
[ 1318.045042][ T1082]  vfs_read+0xa7/0x360
[ 1318.045333][ T1082]  ksys_read+0x70/0xf0
[ 1318.045623][ T1082]  do_syscall_64+0x94/0x180
[ 1318.045913][ T1082]  ? do_syscall_64+0xa0/0x180
[ 1318.046201][ T1082]  ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x7d/0x100
[ 1318.046487][ T1082]  ? do_syscall_64+0xa0/0x180
[ 1318.046773][ T1082]  ? do_syscall_64+0xa0/0x180
[ 1318.047057][ T1082]  ? do_syscall_64+0xa0/0x180
[ 1318.047337][ T1082]  ? do_syscall_64+0xa0/0x180
[ 1318.047611][ T1082]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0x4e
[ 1318.047887][ T1082] RIP: 0033:0x7f480b70a39d
[ 1318.048162][ T1082] Code: 91 ba 0d 00 f7 d8 64 89 02 b8 ff ff ff ff eb b2 e8 18 a3 01 00 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 80 3d a9 3c 0e 00 00 74 17 31 c0 0f 05 <48> 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 5b c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 53 48 83
[ 1318.048769][ T1082] RSP: 002b:00007ffde77f5c68 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000000
[ 1318.049083][ T1082] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000800 RCX: 00007f480b70a39d
[ 1318.049392][ T1082] RDX: 0000000000000800 RSI: 000055c9f2120c00 RDI: 0000000000000008
[ 1318.049703][ T1082] RBP: 0000000000000800 R08: 000055c9f2120a94 R09: 0000000000000007
[ 1318.050011][ T1082] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 000055c9f2120c00
[ 1318.050324][ T1082] R13: 0000000000000008 R14: 0000000000000008 R15: 0000000000000800
[ 1318.050638][ T1082]  </TASK>

amdgpu_debugfs_mqd_read() holds a reservation when it calls
put_user(), which may fault and acquire the mmap_sem. This violates
the established locking order.

Bounce the mqd data through a kernel buffer to get put_user() out of
the illegal section.

Fixes: 445d85e3c1df ("drm/amdgpu: add debugfs interface for reading MQDs")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v6.5+
Reviewed-by: Shashank Sharma <shashank.sharma@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ring.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ring.c
index 5505d646f43a..06f0a6534a94 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ring.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ring.c
@@ -524,46 +524,58 @@ static ssize_t amdgpu_debugfs_mqd_read(struct file *f, char __user *buf,
 {
 	struct amdgpu_ring *ring = file_inode(f)->i_private;
 	volatile u32 *mqd;
-	int r;
+	u32 *kbuf;
+	int r, i;
 	uint32_t value, result;
 
 	if (*pos & 3 || size & 3)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
-	result = 0;
+	kbuf = kmalloc(ring->mqd_size, GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!kbuf)
+		return -ENOMEM;
 
 	r = amdgpu_bo_reserve(ring->mqd_obj, false);
 	if (unlikely(r != 0))
-		return r;
+		goto err_free;
 
 	r = amdgpu_bo_kmap(ring->mqd_obj, (void **)&mqd);
-	if (r) {
-		amdgpu_bo_unreserve(ring->mqd_obj);
-		return r;
-	}
+	if (r)
+		goto err_unreserve;
 
+	/*
+	 * Copy to local buffer to avoid put_user(), which might fault
+	 * and acquire mmap_sem, under reservation_ww_class_mutex.
+	 */
+	for (i = 0; i < ring->mqd_size/sizeof(u32); i++)
+		kbuf[i] = mqd[i];
+
+	amdgpu_bo_kunmap(ring->mqd_obj);
+	amdgpu_bo_unreserve(ring->mqd_obj);
+
+	result = 0;
 	while (size) {
 		if (*pos >= ring->mqd_size)
-			goto done;
+			break;
 
-		value = mqd[*pos/4];
+		value = kbuf[*pos/4];
 		r = put_user(value, (uint32_t *)buf);
 		if (r)
-			goto done;
+			goto err_free;
 		buf += 4;
 		result += 4;
 		size -= 4;
 		*pos += 4;
 	}
 
-done:
-	amdgpu_bo_kunmap(ring->mqd_obj);
-	mqd = NULL;
-	amdgpu_bo_unreserve(ring->mqd_obj);
-	if (r)
-		return r;
-
+	kfree(kbuf);
 	return result;
+
+err_unreserve:
+	amdgpu_bo_unreserve(ring->mqd_obj);
+err_free:
+	kfree(kbuf);
+	return r;
 }
 
 static const struct file_operations amdgpu_debugfs_mqd_fops = {