From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6819D15218A; Tue, 2 Jul 2024 17:22:26 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1719940946; cv=none; b=XwjFV/Ms7i65G+AUbcDRaM2AdC4qegYCcGCwne/3ZNqPg4QjlN/o/mEo1/spMFNHCGKH9X95WxPklFYx8TiP9UBz/djdJXUZtudgVQvyF6Zt2DW2AwwRB8Y0M9WcTgHvJscgiuWoCvkp/uDwwqG7Mohhq8EWooLwXkHWgJRgGkU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1719940946; c=relaxed/simple; bh=j9bUT9153Szy/mwE+/IGsvcGOxK9iu4hdNHmABO49bM=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=NyjmRv8uKf7rMvlZtenivFXRTXBINYfVs0ocnOHMZx90eX8Ml9wX7VgXjA7I3+DF1u5/VO7NUM2AqzoG0b9RsrkSzRF1d+8qN6/Tt6o4Uzz6c56bSp7pxYe6ocRbMXI+D7AVgGBpZVPa7wkTmNET52Y8KYJmftqPGHHfgAMxAKk= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b=mxl/XLUH; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b="mxl/XLUH" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D2A31C116B1; Tue, 2 Jul 2024 17:22:25 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1719940946; bh=j9bUT9153Szy/mwE+/IGsvcGOxK9iu4hdNHmABO49bM=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=mxl/XLUHZ5cAHIdeUDYQrIw/rI5/MQNMoz5G2xuFLQ8vbcxayuGNsaM0MowH8JGX8 co26Bqkw5b40OBWY9l4s270YnkCQkk2LpYDZ07sc3gGzVoLOuL3+Do8zvGjWKYgTvM g/3eG/RQ3gLR4SQtdpmIXPpbh2vsrmGPIBQw+PpY= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , patches@lists.linux.dev, Zhaoyang Huang , "Hailong.Liu" , "Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)" , Baoquan He , Christoph Hellwig , Lorenzo Stoakes , Thomas Gleixner , Andrew Morton Subject: [PATCH 6.6 084/163] mm: fix incorrect vbq reference in purge_fragmented_block Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2024 19:03:18 +0200 Message-ID: <20240702170236.244894977@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.45.2 In-Reply-To: <20240702170233.048122282@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20240702170233.048122282@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.67 X-stable: review X-Patchwork-Hint: ignore Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit 6.6-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Zhaoyang Huang commit 8c61291fd8500e3b35c7ec0c781b273d8cc96cde upstream. xa_for_each() in _vm_unmap_aliases() loops through all vbs. However, since commit 062eacf57ad9 ("mm: vmalloc: remove a global vmap_blocks xarray") the vb from xarray may not be on the corresponding CPU vmap_block_queue. Consequently, purge_fragmented_block() might use the wrong vbq->lock to protect the free list, leading to vbq->free breakage. Incorrect lock protection can exhaust all vmalloc space as follows: CPU0 CPU1 +--------------------------------------------+ | +--------------------+ +-----+ | +--> | |---->| |------+ | CPU1:vbq free_list | | vb1 | +--- | |<----| |<-----+ | +--------------------+ +-----+ | +--------------------------------------------+ _vm_unmap_aliases() vb_alloc() new_vmap_block() xa_for_each(&vbq->vmap_blocks, idx, vb) --> vb in CPU1:vbq->freelist purge_fragmented_block(vb) spin_lock(&vbq->lock) spin_lock(&vbq->lock) --> use CPU0:vbq->lock --> use CPU1:vbq->lock list_del_rcu(&vb->free_list) list_add_tail_rcu(&vb->free_list, &vbq->free) __list_del(vb->prev, vb->next) next->prev = prev +--------------------+ | | | CPU1:vbq free_list | +---| |<--+ | +--------------------+ | +----------------------------+ __list_add(new, head->prev, head) +--------------------------------------------+ | +--------------------+ +-----+ | +--> | |---->| |------+ | CPU1:vbq free_list | | vb2 | +--- | |<----| |<-----+ | +--------------------+ +-----+ | +--------------------------------------------+ prev->next = next +--------------------------------------------+ |----------------------------+ | | +--------------------+ | +-----+ | +--> | |--+ | |------+ | CPU1:vbq free_list | | vb2 | +--- | |<----| |<-----+ | +--------------------+ +-----+ | +--------------------------------------------+ Here’s a list breakdown. All vbs, which were to be added to ‘prev’, cannot be used by list_for_each_entry_rcu(vb, &vbq->free, free_list) in vb_alloc(). Thus, vmalloc space is exhausted. This issue affects both erofs and f2fs, the stacktrace is as follows: erofs: [] __switch_to+0x174 [] __schedule+0x624 [] schedule+0x7c [] schedule_preempt_disabled+0x24 [] __mutex_lock+0x374 [] __mutex_lock_slowpath+0x14 [] mutex_lock+0x24 [] reclaim_and_purge_vmap_areas+0x44 [] alloc_vmap_area+0x2e0 [] vm_map_ram+0x1b0 [] z_erofs_lz4_decompress+0x278 [] z_erofs_decompress_queue+0x650 [] z_erofs_runqueue+0x7f4 [] z_erofs_read_folio+0x104 [] filemap_read_folio+0x6c [] filemap_fault+0x300 [] __do_fault+0xc8 [] handle_mm_fault+0xb38 [] do_page_fault+0x288 [] do_translation_fault[jt]+0x40 [] do_mem_abort+0x58 [] el0_ia+0x70 [] el0t_64_sync_handler[jt]+0xb0 [] ret_to_user[jt]+0x0 f2fs: [] __switch_to+0x174 [] __schedule+0x624 [] schedule+0x7c [] schedule_preempt_disabled+0x24 [] __mutex_lock+0x374 [] __mutex_lock_slowpath+0x14 [] mutex_lock+0x24 [] reclaim_and_purge_vmap_areas+0x44 [] alloc_vmap_area+0x2e0 [] vm_map_ram+0x1b0 [] f2fs_prepare_decomp_mem+0x144 [] f2fs_alloc_dic+0x264 [] f2fs_read_multi_pages+0x428 [] f2fs_mpage_readpages+0x314 [] f2fs_readahead+0x50 [] read_pages+0x80 [] page_cache_ra_unbounded+0x1a0 [] page_cache_ra_order+0x274 [] do_sync_mmap_readahead+0x11c [] filemap_fault+0x1a0 [] f2fs_filemap_fault+0x28 [] __do_fault+0xc8 [] handle_mm_fault+0xb38 [] do_page_fault+0x288 [] do_translation_fault[jt]+0x40 [] do_mem_abort+0x58 [] el0_ia+0x70 [] el0t_64_sync_handler[jt]+0xb0 [] ret_to_user[jt]+0x0 To fix this, introducee cpu within vmap_block to record which this vb belongs to. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240614021352.1822225-1-zhaoyang.huang@unisoc.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240607023116.1720640-1-zhaoyang.huang@unisoc.com Fixes: fc1e0d980037 ("mm/vmalloc: prevent stale TLBs in fully utilized blocks") Signed-off-by: Zhaoyang Huang Suggested-by: Hailong.Liu Reviewed-by: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) Cc: Baoquan He Cc: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Lorenzo Stoakes Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- mm/vmalloc.c | 21 +++++++++++++++------ 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) --- a/mm/vmalloc.c +++ b/mm/vmalloc.c @@ -1939,6 +1939,7 @@ struct vmap_block { struct list_head free_list; struct rcu_head rcu_head; struct list_head purge; + unsigned int cpu; }; /* Queue of free and dirty vmap blocks, for allocation and flushing purposes */ @@ -2066,8 +2067,15 @@ static void *new_vmap_block(unsigned int free_vmap_area(va); return ERR_PTR(err); } - - vbq = raw_cpu_ptr(&vmap_block_queue); + /* + * list_add_tail_rcu could happened in another core + * rather than vb->cpu due to task migration, which + * is safe as list_add_tail_rcu will ensure the list's + * integrity together with list_for_each_rcu from read + * side. + */ + vb->cpu = raw_smp_processor_id(); + vbq = per_cpu_ptr(&vmap_block_queue, vb->cpu); spin_lock(&vbq->lock); list_add_tail_rcu(&vb->free_list, &vbq->free); spin_unlock(&vbq->lock); @@ -2093,9 +2101,10 @@ static void free_vmap_block(struct vmap_ } static bool purge_fragmented_block(struct vmap_block *vb, - struct vmap_block_queue *vbq, struct list_head *purge_list, - bool force_purge) + struct list_head *purge_list, bool force_purge) { + struct vmap_block_queue *vbq = &per_cpu(vmap_block_queue, vb->cpu); + if (vb->free + vb->dirty != VMAP_BBMAP_BITS || vb->dirty == VMAP_BBMAP_BITS) return false; @@ -2143,7 +2152,7 @@ static void purge_fragmented_blocks(int continue; spin_lock(&vb->lock); - purge_fragmented_block(vb, vbq, &purge, true); + purge_fragmented_block(vb, &purge, true); spin_unlock(&vb->lock); } rcu_read_unlock(); @@ -2280,7 +2289,7 @@ static void _vm_unmap_aliases(unsigned l * not purgeable, check whether there is dirty * space to be flushed. */ - if (!purge_fragmented_block(vb, vbq, &purge_list, false) && + if (!purge_fragmented_block(vb, &purge_list, false) && vb->dirty_max && vb->dirty != VMAP_BBMAP_BITS) { unsigned long va_start = vb->va->va_start; unsigned long s, e;