From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Wen Gu <guwen@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, alikernel-developer@linux.alibaba.com,
Dust Li <dust.li@linux.alibaba.com>,
"D. Wythe" <alibuda@linux.alibaba.com>,
mqaio@linux.alibaba.com
Subject: Re: Please backport d8616ee2affc ("bpf, sockmap: Fix sk->sk_forward_alloc warn_on in sk_stream_kill_queues") to linux-5.10.y
Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2024 10:22:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2024070221-clergyman-oversold-d24a@gregkh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e66d3dd0-4d16-463f-a567-b5f5f8da6a92@linux.alibaba.com>
On Tue, Jul 02, 2024 at 10:07:56AM +0800, Wen Gu wrote:
>
>
> On 2024/6/30 20:55, Wen Gu wrote:
> > Hi stable team,
> >
> > Could you please backport [1] to linux-5.10.y?
> >
> > I noticed a regression caused by [2], which was merged to linux-5.10.y since v5.10.80.
> >
> > After sock_map_unhash() helper was removed in [2], sock elems added to the bpf sock map
> > via sock_hash_update_common() cannot be removed if they are in the icsk_accept_queue
> > of the listener sock. Since they have not been accept()ed, they cannot be removed via
> > sock_map_close()->sock_map_remove_links() either.
> >
> > It can be reproduced in network test with short-lived connections. If the server is
> > stopped during the test, there is a probability that some sock elems will remain in
> > the bpf sock map.
> >
> > And with [1], the sock_map_destroy() helper is introduced to invoke sock_map_remove_links()
> > when inet_csk_listen_stop()->inet_child_forget()->inet_csk_destroy_sock(), to remove the
> > sock elems from the bpf sock map in such situation.
> >
> > [1] d8616ee2affc ("bpf, sockmap: Fix sk->sk_forward_alloc warn_on in sk_stream_kill_queues")
> > (link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220524075311.649153-1-wangyufen@huawei.com/)
> > [2] 8b5c98a67c1b ("bpf, sockmap: Remove unhash handler for BPF sockmap usage")
> > (link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20211103204736.248403-3-john.fastabend@gmail.com/)
> >
> > Thanks!
> > Wen Gu
>
> Hi stable team,
>
> Just want to confirm that the backport of this patch is consistent with the stable tree rules
> as I thought. And is there any other information I need to provide? :)
Please relax, you sent this on Sunday and asked about it on Tuesday,
barely 1 day later?
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-02 8:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-30 12:55 Please backport d8616ee2affc ("bpf, sockmap: Fix sk->sk_forward_alloc warn_on in sk_stream_kill_queues") to linux-5.10.y Wen Gu
2024-07-02 2:07 ` Wen Gu
2024-07-02 8:22 ` Greg KH [this message]
2024-07-02 12:55 ` Wen Gu
2024-07-02 8:23 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2024070221-clergyman-oversold-d24a@gregkh \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=alibuda@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=alikernel-developer@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=dust.li@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=guwen@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=mqaio@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox