From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 980F2FBF6; Thu, 4 Jul 2024 07:20:25 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1720077625; cv=none; b=CnSvXcDtTN5DXH98Z7Cza8KEgm/CsrbceyMnZw5cIFCEftMiO+OAU2mGWJ6kqI/oeYpgSD/wI5mAfBPFsdLzqr0mQd3SaDp0HMhVNsnZSmPdkfRzZbU6saKVVylW9VNtdJm1hRj03nx2tC2FGmS9TquEL1Hixg0P7nCUGMst1oE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1720077625; c=relaxed/simple; bh=MfDH1BzJEULCy9JB8I9/QpHlhvwA4blOe6gg/saAUMI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=ik8ZutSPffwUgZuamiR2XSr7YI+wiX1mwmJkMGqWO5KItjmpQi+0SpeVXC+ygHbl1/gTNXm8799UhWKAj8rOai16htSoWRMlrFxk8MwTJKc7ggAsU80WbgQ5SZfc7dEfdPJPyWZMzznKlJNpROQNtHbeu+7pDu6Sy6rCtNBXDEs= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b=1ZtUmT/S; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b="1ZtUmT/S" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C16C5C32781; Thu, 4 Jul 2024 07:20:24 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1720077625; bh=MfDH1BzJEULCy9JB8I9/QpHlhvwA4blOe6gg/saAUMI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=1ZtUmT/ShDlUTqNSLSmIv4qI4xK2YhFT0hbmuub/Z5HLyd4Kw+dX75aPIoQycpltW cF69cqR52h88R+zTMiZnCekT2OHETTKVweak0vJuEfhE0qW5VnWwdyHFQgwyblfXYh Co0ZmgCDDP1V/rudZpPyLAO23KMAW4WHek0MePMA= Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2024 09:20:22 +0200 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Mike Rapoport Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev, Narasimhan V , Jan Beulich , "Borislav Petkov (AMD)" , "Paul E. McKenney" , Sasha Levin Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.15 255/356] x86/mm/numa: Use NUMA_NO_NODE when calling memblock_set_node() Message-ID: <2024070412-choice-glare-2041@gregkh> References: <20240703102913.093882413@linuxfoundation.org> <20240703102922.763942486@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Wed, Jul 03, 2024 at 03:53:18PM +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote: > On Wed, Jul 03, 2024 at 12:39:51PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > 5.15-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. > > > > ------------------ > > > > From: Jan Beulich > > > > [ Upstream commit 3ac36aa7307363b7247ccb6f6a804e11496b2b36 ] > > > > memblock_set_node() warns about using MAX_NUMNODES, see > > > > e0eec24e2e19 ("memblock: make memblock_set_node() also warn about use of MAX_NUMNODES") > > > > for details. > > This commit was a fix for e0eec24e2e19, it's not needed for kernels before 6.8. Thanks for the review, now dropped from all queues. greg k-h