* [PATCH 5.10 RESEND] x86/retpoline: Move a NOENDBR annotation to the SRSO dummy return thunk
@ 2024-07-09 13:20 Jim Mattson
2024-07-09 13:33 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-07-09 20:26 ` [PATCH 5.10 RESEND] " kernel test robot
0 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Jim Mattson @ 2024-07-09 13:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, Borislav Petkov (AMD), Ingo Molnar, x86,
linux-kernel
Cc: Jim Mattson, Greg Thelen, stable
The linux-5.10-y backport of commit b377c66ae350 ("x86/retpoline: Add
NOENDBR annotation to the SRSO dummy return thunk") misplaced the new
NOENDBR annotation, repeating the annotation on __x86_return_thunk,
rather than adding the annotation to the !CONFIG_CPU_SRSO version of
srso_alias_untrain_ret, as intended.
Move the annotation to the right place.
Fixes: 0bdc64e9e716 ("x86/retpoline: Add NOENDBR annotation to the SRSO dummy return thunk")
Reported-by: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>
Acked-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
---
arch/x86/lib/retpoline.S | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/lib/retpoline.S b/arch/x86/lib/retpoline.S
index ab9b047790dd..d1902213a0d6 100644
--- a/arch/x86/lib/retpoline.S
+++ b/arch/x86/lib/retpoline.S
@@ -105,6 +105,7 @@ __EXPORT_THUNK(srso_alias_untrain_ret)
/* dummy definition for alternatives */
SYM_START(srso_alias_untrain_ret, SYM_L_GLOBAL, SYM_A_NONE)
ANNOTATE_UNRET_SAFE
+ ANNOTATE_NOENDBR
ret
int3
SYM_FUNC_END(srso_alias_untrain_ret)
@@ -258,7 +259,6 @@ SYM_CODE_START(__x86_return_thunk)
UNWIND_HINT_FUNC
ANNOTATE_NOENDBR
ANNOTATE_UNRET_SAFE
- ANNOTATE_NOENDBR
ret
int3
SYM_CODE_END(__x86_return_thunk)
--
2.45.2.803.g4e1b14247a-goog
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.10 RESEND] x86/retpoline: Move a NOENDBR annotation to the SRSO dummy return thunk
2024-07-09 13:20 [PATCH 5.10 RESEND] x86/retpoline: Move a NOENDBR annotation to the SRSO dummy return thunk Jim Mattson
@ 2024-07-09 13:33 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-07-09 13:55 ` Borislav Petkov
2024-07-09 20:26 ` [PATCH 5.10 RESEND] " kernel test robot
1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman @ 2024-07-09 13:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jim Mattson
Cc: Borislav Petkov (AMD), Ingo Molnar, x86, linux-kernel,
Greg Thelen, stable
On Tue, Jul 09, 2024 at 06:20:46AM -0700, Jim Mattson wrote:
> The linux-5.10-y backport of commit b377c66ae350 ("x86/retpoline: Add
> NOENDBR annotation to the SRSO dummy return thunk") misplaced the new
> NOENDBR annotation, repeating the annotation on __x86_return_thunk,
> rather than adding the annotation to the !CONFIG_CPU_SRSO version of
> srso_alias_untrain_ret, as intended.
>
> Move the annotation to the right place.
>
> Fixes: 0bdc64e9e716 ("x86/retpoline: Add NOENDBR annotation to the SRSO dummy return thunk")
> Reported-by: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>
> Acked-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> ---
> arch/x86/lib/retpoline.S | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Why is this a RESEND?
And is this only needed in this one stable branch or in any others?
thanks,
greg k-h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.10 RESEND] x86/retpoline: Move a NOENDBR annotation to the SRSO dummy return thunk
2024-07-09 13:33 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
@ 2024-07-09 13:55 ` Borislav Petkov
2024-07-09 14:12 ` [PATCH 6.1] " Borislav Petkov
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Borislav Petkov @ 2024-07-09 13:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: Jim Mattson, Ingo Molnar, x86, linux-kernel, Greg Thelen, stable
On Tue, Jul 09, 2024 at 03:33:54PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> And is this only needed in this one stable branch or in any others?
Lemme take care of them.
Thx.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* [PATCH 6.1] x86/retpoline: Move a NOENDBR annotation to the SRSO dummy return thunk
2024-07-09 13:55 ` Borislav Petkov
@ 2024-07-09 14:12 ` Borislav Petkov
2024-07-09 23:17 ` kernel test robot
2024-07-15 11:41 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
0 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Borislav Petkov @ 2024-07-09 14:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: Jim Mattson, Ingo Molnar, x86, linux-kernel, Greg Thelen, stable
From: Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH] x86/retpoline: Move a NOENDBR annotation to the SRSO dummy return thunk
The linux-6.1-y backport of commit b377c66ae350 ("x86/retpoline: Add
NOENDBR annotation to the SRSO dummy return thunk") misplaced the new
NOENDBR annotation, repeating the annotation on __x86_return_thunk,
rather than adding the annotation to the !CONFIG_CPU_SRSO version of
srso_alias_untrain_ret, as intended.
Move the annotation to the right place.
Fixes: 0bdc64e9e716 ("x86/retpoline: Add NOENDBR annotation to the SRSO dummy return thunk")
Reported-by: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>
Acked-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
---
arch/x86/lib/retpoline.S | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/lib/retpoline.S b/arch/x86/lib/retpoline.S
index 055955c9bfcb..7880e2a7ec6a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/lib/retpoline.S
+++ b/arch/x86/lib/retpoline.S
@@ -107,6 +107,7 @@ __EXPORT_THUNK(srso_alias_untrain_ret)
/* dummy definition for alternatives */
SYM_START(srso_alias_untrain_ret, SYM_L_GLOBAL, SYM_A_NONE)
ANNOTATE_UNRET_SAFE
+ ANNOTATE_NOENDBR
ret
int3
SYM_FUNC_END(srso_alias_untrain_ret)
@@ -261,7 +262,6 @@ SYM_CODE_START(__x86_return_thunk)
UNWIND_HINT_FUNC
ANNOTATE_NOENDBR
ANNOTATE_UNRET_SAFE
- ANNOTATE_NOENDBR
ret
int3
SYM_CODE_END(__x86_return_thunk)
--
2.43.0
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.1] x86/retpoline: Move a NOENDBR annotation to the SRSO dummy return thunk
2024-07-09 14:12 ` [PATCH 6.1] " Borislav Petkov
@ 2024-07-09 23:17 ` kernel test robot
2024-07-15 11:41 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: kernel test robot @ 2024-07-09 23:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Borislav Petkov; +Cc: stable, oe-kbuild-all
Hi,
Thanks for your patch.
FYI: kernel test robot notices the stable kernel rule is not satisfied.
The check is based on https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/stable-kernel-rules.html#option-3
Rule: The upstream commit ID must be specified with a separate line above the commit text.
Subject: [PATCH 6.1] x86/retpoline: Move a NOENDBR annotation to the SRSO dummy return thunk
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/stable/20240709141238.GJZo1FVpZU0jRganFu%40fat_crate.local
Please ignore this mail if the patch is not relevant for upstream.
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 6.1] x86/retpoline: Move a NOENDBR annotation to the SRSO dummy return thunk
2024-07-09 14:12 ` [PATCH 6.1] " Borislav Petkov
2024-07-09 23:17 ` kernel test robot
@ 2024-07-15 11:41 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman @ 2024-07-15 11:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Borislav Petkov
Cc: Jim Mattson, Ingo Molnar, x86, linux-kernel, Greg Thelen, stable
On Tue, Jul 09, 2024 at 04:12:38PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> From: Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>
> Subject: [PATCH] x86/retpoline: Move a NOENDBR annotation to the SRSO dummy return thunk
>
> The linux-6.1-y backport of commit b377c66ae350 ("x86/retpoline: Add
> NOENDBR annotation to the SRSO dummy return thunk") misplaced the new
> NOENDBR annotation, repeating the annotation on __x86_return_thunk,
> rather than adding the annotation to the !CONFIG_CPU_SRSO version of
> srso_alias_untrain_ret, as intended.
>
> Move the annotation to the right place.
>
> Fixes: 0bdc64e9e716 ("x86/retpoline: Add NOENDBR annotation to the SRSO dummy return thunk")
> Reported-by: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>
> Acked-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de>
> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> ---
> arch/x86/lib/retpoline.S | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Both now queued up, thanks.
greg k-h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5.10 RESEND] x86/retpoline: Move a NOENDBR annotation to the SRSO dummy return thunk
2024-07-09 13:20 [PATCH 5.10 RESEND] x86/retpoline: Move a NOENDBR annotation to the SRSO dummy return thunk Jim Mattson
2024-07-09 13:33 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
@ 2024-07-09 20:26 ` kernel test robot
1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: kernel test robot @ 2024-07-09 20:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jim Mattson; +Cc: stable, oe-kbuild-all
Hi,
Thanks for your patch.
FYI: kernel test robot notices the stable kernel rule is not satisfied.
The check is based on https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/stable-kernel-rules.html#option-3
Rule: The upstream commit ID must be specified with a separate line above the commit text.
Subject: [PATCH 5.10 RESEND] x86/retpoline: Move a NOENDBR annotation to the SRSO dummy return thunk
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/stable/20240709132058.227930-1-jmattson%40google.com
Please ignore this mail if the patch is not relevant for upstream.
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-07-15 11:41 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-07-09 13:20 [PATCH 5.10 RESEND] x86/retpoline: Move a NOENDBR annotation to the SRSO dummy return thunk Jim Mattson
2024-07-09 13:33 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-07-09 13:55 ` Borislav Petkov
2024-07-09 14:12 ` [PATCH 6.1] " Borislav Petkov
2024-07-09 23:17 ` kernel test robot
2024-07-15 11:41 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-07-09 20:26 ` [PATCH 5.10 RESEND] " kernel test robot
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).