From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D7C1A82499; Wed, 7 Aug 2024 15:04:35 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1723043075; cv=none; b=BUfFSNnoEEMFoPK0XowBN3mWlBXjgzrg8Xrf1ady1hV6xrq9aFE2PhxN1nwwypGSnuOOyxbKGvcBO8VxrxQMfE6FDecVvkynJfCj8onEMlkig/Gij7U52M7ldNhJZA3oJljXlh/XdPaCJLVrq/PBHg7FNclUo3CJbJId/zeHq2U= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1723043075; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ehkAcju/HPDE2pU6BC9BSQaqU5zWpy4Q3nOxm1PvzPE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=nzqm2uXqqzR7c7EottYcfdEed1GWeUgpZn+DedC+ewsyR/Yn0U7wPwVC2NXEF9O36Zioq5jPfN2ronlQwy5pVA987x4TU8eVVFZSLfnr8JX6S7mqnYW5nYM0iXm5BQF8DwR2Dww5ThslwCXVGzwjxvDBPy5Qp92rdMa6FF1vM14= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b=KlGUh3ca; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b="KlGUh3ca" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 69D24C32781; Wed, 7 Aug 2024 15:04:35 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1723043075; bh=ehkAcju/HPDE2pU6BC9BSQaqU5zWpy4Q3nOxm1PvzPE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=KlGUh3calc5nhJgsUeQirtvMLCB7lLdSl/E6T3fQtfsnSko+zmLQvlGNDMM1GjJmL fr0xAb/kVhcAVPonuOhFGkvSFnbzPWIRaBEZ+2C2kyBYhbm7AXsCzgyHk5PO+AjEZ6 ir3FWQRAxl3m4DYBP+MOI3y50Nn58928sJWiQxQM= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , patches@lists.linux.dev, syzbot+a14d8ac9af3a2a4fd0c8@syzkaller.appspotmail.com, Qu Wenruo , Boris Burkov , David Sterba Subject: [PATCH 6.10 082/123] btrfs: make cow_file_range_inline() honor locked_page on error Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2024 17:00:01 +0200 Message-ID: <20240807150023.463985434@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.46.0 In-Reply-To: <20240807150020.790615758@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20240807150020.790615758@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.67 X-stable: review X-Patchwork-Hint: ignore Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit 6.10-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Boris Burkov commit 478574370bef7951fbd9ef5155537d6cbed49472 upstream. The btrfs buffered write path runs through __extent_writepage() which has some tricky return value handling for writepage_delalloc(). Specifically, when that returns 1, we exit, but for other return values we continue and end up calling btrfs_folio_end_all_writers(). If the folio has been unlocked (note that we check the PageLocked bit at the start of __extent_writepage()), this results in an assert panic like this one from syzbot: BTRFS: error (device loop0 state EAL) in free_log_tree:3267: errno=-5 IO failure BTRFS warning (device loop0 state EAL): Skipping commit of aborted transaction. BTRFS: error (device loop0 state EAL) in cleanup_transaction:2018: errno=-5 IO failure assertion failed: folio_test_locked(folio), in fs/btrfs/subpage.c:871 ------------[ cut here ]------------ kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/subpage.c:871! Oops: invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN PTI CPU: 1 PID: 5090 Comm: syz-executor225 Not tainted 6.10.0-syzkaller-05505-gb1bc554e009e #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 06/27/2024 RIP: 0010:btrfs_folio_end_all_writers+0x55b/0x610 fs/btrfs/subpage.c:871 Code: e9 d3 fb ff ff e8 25 22 c2 fd 48 c7 c7 c0 3c 0e 8c 48 c7 c6 80 3d 0e 8c 48 c7 c2 60 3c 0e 8c b9 67 03 00 00 e8 66 47 ad 07 90 <0f> 0b e8 6e 45 b0 07 4c 89 ff be 08 00 00 00 e8 21 12 25 fe 4c 89 RSP: 0018:ffffc900033d72e0 EFLAGS: 00010246 RAX: 0000000000000045 RBX: 00fff0000000402c RCX: 663b7a08c50a0a00 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000080000000 RDI: 0000000000000000 RBP: ffffc900033d73b0 R08: ffffffff8176b98c R09: 1ffff9200067adfc R10: dffffc0000000000 R11: fffff5200067adfd R12: 0000000000000001 R13: dffffc0000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffffea0001cbee80 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8880b9500000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007f5f076012f8 CR3: 000000000e134000 CR4: 00000000003506f0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Call Trace: __extent_writepage fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:1597 [inline] extent_write_cache_pages fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:2251 [inline] btrfs_writepages+0x14d7/0x2760 fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:2373 do_writepages+0x359/0x870 mm/page-writeback.c:2656 filemap_fdatawrite_wbc+0x125/0x180 mm/filemap.c:397 __filemap_fdatawrite_range mm/filemap.c:430 [inline] __filemap_fdatawrite mm/filemap.c:436 [inline] filemap_flush+0xdf/0x130 mm/filemap.c:463 btrfs_release_file+0x117/0x130 fs/btrfs/file.c:1547 __fput+0x24a/0x8a0 fs/file_table.c:422 task_work_run+0x24f/0x310 kernel/task_work.c:222 exit_task_work include/linux/task_work.h:40 [inline] do_exit+0xa2f/0x27f0 kernel/exit.c:877 do_group_exit+0x207/0x2c0 kernel/exit.c:1026 __do_sys_exit_group kernel/exit.c:1037 [inline] __se_sys_exit_group kernel/exit.c:1035 [inline] __x64_sys_exit_group+0x3f/0x40 kernel/exit.c:1035 x64_sys_call+0x2634/0x2640 arch/x86/include/generated/asm/syscalls_64.h:232 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f RIP: 0033:0x7f5f075b70c9 Code: Unable to access opcode bytes at 0x7f5f075b709f. I was hitting the same issue by doing hundreds of accelerated runs of generic/475, which also hits IO errors by design. I instrumented that reproducer with bpftrace and found that the undesirable folio_unlock was coming from the following callstack: folio_unlock+5 __process_pages_contig+475 cow_file_range_inline.constprop.0+230 cow_file_range+803 btrfs_run_delalloc_range+566 writepage_delalloc+332 __extent_writepage # inlined in my stacktrace, but I added it here extent_write_cache_pages+622 Looking at the bisected-to patch in the syzbot report, Josef realized that the logic of the cow_file_range_inline error path subtly changing. In the past, on error, it jumped to out_unlock in cow_file_range(), which honors the locked_page, so when we ultimately call folio_end_all_writers(), the folio of interest is still locked. After the change, we always unlocked ignoring the locked_page, on both success and error. On the success path, this all results in returning 1 to __extent_writepage(), which skips the folio_end_all_writers() call, which makes it OK to have unlocked. Fix the bug by wiring the locked_page into cow_file_range_inline() and only setting locked_page to NULL on success. Reported-by: syzbot+a14d8ac9af3a2a4fd0c8@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Fixes: 0586d0a89e77 ("btrfs: move extent bit and page cleanup into cow_file_range_inline") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.10+ Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo Signed-off-by: Boris Burkov Signed-off-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- fs/btrfs/inode.c | 16 ++++++++++------ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) --- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c @@ -737,8 +737,9 @@ out: return ret; } -static noinline int cow_file_range_inline(struct btrfs_inode *inode, u64 offset, - u64 end, +static noinline int cow_file_range_inline(struct btrfs_inode *inode, + struct page *locked_page, + u64 offset, u64 end, size_t compressed_size, int compress_type, struct folio *compressed_folio, @@ -762,7 +763,10 @@ static noinline int cow_file_range_inlin return ret; } - extent_clear_unlock_delalloc(inode, offset, end, NULL, &cached, + if (ret == 0) + locked_page = NULL; + + extent_clear_unlock_delalloc(inode, offset, end, locked_page, &cached, clear_flags, PAGE_UNLOCK | PAGE_START_WRITEBACK | PAGE_END_WRITEBACK); @@ -1037,10 +1041,10 @@ again: * extent for the subpage case. */ if (total_in < actual_end) - ret = cow_file_range_inline(inode, start, end, 0, + ret = cow_file_range_inline(inode, NULL, start, end, 0, BTRFS_COMPRESS_NONE, NULL, false); else - ret = cow_file_range_inline(inode, start, end, total_compressed, + ret = cow_file_range_inline(inode, NULL, start, end, total_compressed, compress_type, folios[0], false); if (ret <= 0) { if (ret < 0) @@ -1359,7 +1363,7 @@ static noinline int cow_file_range(struc if (!no_inline) { /* lets try to make an inline extent */ - ret = cow_file_range_inline(inode, start, end, 0, + ret = cow_file_range_inline(inode, locked_page, start, end, 0, BTRFS_COMPRESS_NONE, NULL, false); if (ret <= 0) { /*