From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C80467F6 for ; Sun, 11 Aug 2024 09:46:07 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1723369567; cv=none; b=rc8pLPEPTxalLUSCgbOg5q/n79Zsr/hQVYrIrxjghRh4LW70eJwU1gEJzkJbqe8qY9+kMQLOLeQcojNU9EKnAx/E1sCzmvlPg90j98mZZF1l80afgSMMggTl2xZXbc4hOJdiif6T4R5s1kqnhTZVvRe0T4Ps3IL5xxE0IAziQ+c= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1723369567; c=relaxed/simple; bh=zwUxA61WKaRiOGHLt2zSl/s/NyK2YjHFJ5r+Iv5wD7I=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=evyKeGiFU33dIgNVwWlG3jTROM9G4dKvUQKHlsptERlQ/OWXx3bSgnDBImyinXuSXmNNBVtQE9Ai2mObX6rhhvQc+DhKLnmhthX0M4x+fwtA+IAlDoZ4bhIHOwC52dyTKUZWlMw9t5KXdZF6eQyuBIk9txl/vK9E3WdUbB1Np9U= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b=QLYrGmxA; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b="QLYrGmxA" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D8050C32786; Sun, 11 Aug 2024 09:46:06 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1723369567; bh=zwUxA61WKaRiOGHLt2zSl/s/NyK2YjHFJ5r+Iv5wD7I=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=QLYrGmxAu3miSHRZFQAuv9oeVQ52DLgn7NColb4qxrhlTDorX+3VJl5h26YwwG/SC uJZR66JR2JxGVuNBsm1CbzkjJk4No+3Lc4QInZNeaW0v5mW6SsMWY7zLK/PaZL6O5C ZHGt9L4hJwiL9rLPeVKG8pZd3J0wgy6IqdRkpZeQ= Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2024 11:46:04 +0200 From: "gregkh@linuxfoundation.org" To: "Li, Yunxiang (Teddy)" Cc: "Deucher, Alexander" , "Koenig, Christian" , "stable@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] drm/amdgpu: fix locking scope when flushing tlb" failed to apply to 6.10-stable tree Message-ID: <2024081132-sterling-serving-8b4f@gregkh> References: <2024080738-tarmac-unproven-1f45@gregkh> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Fri, Aug 09, 2024 at 01:37:50PM +0000, Li, Yunxiang (Teddy) wrote: > [AMD Official Use Only - AMD Internal Distribution Only] > > Hi Greg, > > I believe this commit has already been picked onto 6.10-y as commit 84801d4f1e4fbd2c44dddecaec9099bdff100a42 Then why is it showing up here again? What broke in your workflow to cause this? Please fix that as there are loads of these "double" commits with no ability for me at all to detect them being a double commit. If this continues, I'll just end up dropping all AMD stable-marked patches as it's too much of a hasle to deal with, and expect you all to send me either git ids, or patch series, to apply. No other subsystem has this issue. greg k-h