From: "Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)" <matttbe@kernel.org>
To: stable@vger.kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: MPTCP Upstream <mptcp@lists.linux.dev>,
"Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)" <matttbe@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 6.6.y] Revert "selftests: mptcp: simult flows: mark 'unbalanced' tests as flaky"
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2024 17:31:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240812153133.574382-2-matttbe@kernel.org> (raw)
This reverts commit 052c9f0c140c78e5d6826688b5d2f33e19db0ae7.
If the test doesn't pass, we can get this error:
# ./simult_flows.sh: line 275: mptcp_lib_subtest_is_flaky: command not found
This patch is not needed in v6.6: it is there to mark a test as "flaky",
but the MPTCP selftests infrastructure in v6.6 doesn't support them. So
it looks better to revert this patch.
Signed-off-by: Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) <matttbe@kernel.org>
---
tools/testing/selftests/net/mptcp/simult_flows.sh | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/mptcp/simult_flows.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/net/mptcp/simult_flows.sh
index be97a7ed0950..f24bd2bf0831 100755
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/mptcp/simult_flows.sh
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/mptcp/simult_flows.sh
@@ -262,7 +262,7 @@ run_test()
do_transfer $small $large $time
lret=$?
mptcp_lib_result_code "${lret}" "${msg}"
- if [ $lret -ne 0 ] && ! mptcp_lib_subtest_is_flaky; then
+ if [ $lret -ne 0 ]; then
ret=$lret
[ $bail -eq 0 ] || exit $ret
fi
@@ -272,7 +272,7 @@ run_test()
do_transfer $large $small $time
lret=$?
mptcp_lib_result_code "${lret}" "${msg}"
- if [ $lret -ne 0 ] && ! mptcp_lib_subtest_is_flaky; then
+ if [ $lret -ne 0 ]; then
ret=$lret
[ $bail -eq 0 ] || exit $ret
fi
@@ -305,7 +305,7 @@ run_test 10 10 0 0 "balanced bwidth"
run_test 10 10 1 25 "balanced bwidth with unbalanced delay"
# we still need some additional infrastructure to pass the following test-cases
-MPTCP_LIB_SUBTEST_FLAKY=1 run_test 10 3 0 0 "unbalanced bwidth"
+run_test 10 3 0 0 "unbalanced bwidth"
run_test 10 3 1 25 "unbalanced bwidth with unbalanced delay"
run_test 10 3 25 1 "unbalanced bwidth with opposed, unbalanced delay"
--
2.45.2
reply other threads:[~2024-08-12 15:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240812153133.574382-2-matttbe@kernel.org \
--to=matttbe@kernel.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=mptcp@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox