From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BE7621AC8BB; Thu, 15 Aug 2024 14:05:41 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1723730741; cv=none; b=roELelMSF7Mv2JdMFxHNwy+8Yr6MIYVMwvaucD2I9v0u9fxh5R3KRDZs4FbpGVTxH4uAnUQzuxcwIJOhSPQn9lm6BEyVB+Jq+5B7s99mKLvbxXDHwWzT5bMJGkIBfOjhPKPgSCqh4W25eGZZ31Dm4o8PQZo9DoxyETKb9Oy4M70= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1723730741; c=relaxed/simple; bh=FsIK4VK9J4V58ZMyPO5iETevpDqr40NVbWkCRoss7/Q=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=EubiLgHL2ogoeX+h2lj3Ofiht//P7lps0hJorpl6fPWP8qUuNUueEmtJX4W0A933Z80dW8NSc4hH3LgBwWjSjwEKotJtjJ6WiAmT0It2QuZ+a8qVH1zchH4b5nXU0lLErE43VtE/Vnon7NaKoh7KbiqzI51Yg6c9Uk2Y6hkUFFE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b=oqkm92At; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b="oqkm92At" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3B0E2C32786; Thu, 15 Aug 2024 14:05:41 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1723730741; bh=FsIK4VK9J4V58ZMyPO5iETevpDqr40NVbWkCRoss7/Q=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=oqkm92At6VKNcK24jHy2aH75g9wLlqYw703styS44TLAR5egfyFEHWdm/QOZGTqNh XJqrLih37ZVH3rJMnzBIlpoTyNqAqMB5o+/3DLxCfIHQIDGrWo4N205cUZy7QpfCKG 956Ravx9+H0kXnlciWX2pJmFRGxGDgBChJ6gELhk= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , patches@lists.linux.dev, Josef Bacik , Jeff Layton , Chuck Lever Subject: [PATCH 6.1 18/38] sunrpc: dont change ->sv_stats if it doesnt exist Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2024 15:25:52 +0200 Message-ID: <20240815131833.652544899@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.46.0 In-Reply-To: <20240815131832.944273699@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20240815131832.944273699@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.67 X-stable: review X-Patchwork-Hint: ignore Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit 6.1-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Josef Bacik [ Upstream commit ab42f4d9a26f1723dcfd6c93fcf768032b2bb5e7 ] We check for the existence of ->sv_stats elsewhere except in the core processing code. It appears that only nfsd actual exports these values anywhere, everybody else just has a write only copy of sv_stats in their svc_program. Add a check for ->sv_stats before every adjustment to allow us to eliminate the stats struct from all the users who don't report the stats. Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton [ cel: adjusted to apply to v6.1.y ] Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- net/sunrpc/svc.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) --- a/net/sunrpc/svc.c +++ b/net/sunrpc/svc.c @@ -1324,7 +1324,8 @@ svc_process_common(struct svc_rqst *rqst goto err_bad_proc; /* Syntactic check complete */ - serv->sv_stats->rpccnt++; + if (serv->sv_stats) + serv->sv_stats->rpccnt++; trace_svc_process(rqstp, progp->pg_name); /* Build the reply header. */ @@ -1377,7 +1378,8 @@ err_short_len: goto close_xprt; err_bad_rpc: - serv->sv_stats->rpcbadfmt++; + if (serv->sv_stats) + serv->sv_stats->rpcbadfmt++; svc_putnl(resv, 1); /* REJECT */ svc_putnl(resv, 0); /* RPC_MISMATCH */ svc_putnl(resv, 2); /* Only RPCv2 supported */ @@ -1387,7 +1389,8 @@ err_bad_rpc: err_bad_auth: dprintk("svc: authentication failed (%d)\n", be32_to_cpu(rqstp->rq_auth_stat)); - serv->sv_stats->rpcbadauth++; + if (serv->sv_stats) + serv->sv_stats->rpcbadauth++; /* Restore write pointer to location of accept status: */ xdr_ressize_check(rqstp, reply_statp); svc_putnl(resv, 1); /* REJECT */ @@ -1397,7 +1400,8 @@ err_bad_auth: err_bad_prog: dprintk("svc: unknown program %d\n", prog); - serv->sv_stats->rpcbadfmt++; + if (serv->sv_stats) + serv->sv_stats->rpcbadfmt++; svc_putnl(resv, RPC_PROG_UNAVAIL); goto sendit; @@ -1405,7 +1409,8 @@ err_bad_vers: svc_printk(rqstp, "unknown version (%d for prog %d, %s)\n", rqstp->rq_vers, rqstp->rq_prog, progp->pg_name); - serv->sv_stats->rpcbadfmt++; + if (serv->sv_stats) + serv->sv_stats->rpcbadfmt++; svc_putnl(resv, RPC_PROG_MISMATCH); svc_putnl(resv, process.mismatch.lovers); svc_putnl(resv, process.mismatch.hivers); @@ -1414,7 +1419,8 @@ err_bad_vers: err_bad_proc: svc_printk(rqstp, "unknown procedure (%d)\n", rqstp->rq_proc); - serv->sv_stats->rpcbadfmt++; + if (serv->sv_stats) + serv->sv_stats->rpcbadfmt++; svc_putnl(resv, RPC_PROC_UNAVAIL); goto sendit; @@ -1423,7 +1429,8 @@ err_garbage: rpc_stat = rpc_garbage_args; err_bad: - serv->sv_stats->rpcbadfmt++; + if (serv->sv_stats) + serv->sv_stats->rpcbadfmt++; svc_putnl(resv, ntohl(rpc_stat)); goto sendit; } @@ -1469,7 +1476,8 @@ svc_process(struct svc_rqst *rqstp) out_baddir: svc_printk(rqstp, "bad direction 0x%08x, dropping request\n", be32_to_cpu(dir)); - rqstp->rq_server->sv_stats->rpcbadfmt++; + if (rqstp->rq_server->sv_stats) + rqstp->rq_server->sv_stats->rpcbadfmt++; out_drop: svc_drop(rqstp); return 0;