From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D827E19D8A9 for ; Tue, 27 Aug 2024 12:37:24 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1724762245; cv=none; b=gKQw1aNXz/Ppnjms3ERi0z6zYWG7kq8rrHbQBWWjKdNXD8d3LlykRUspN77UhQmOpMq+zGh1O9z6dVeJXoPLBk2wykOBaPjeScqKnIKaDkj8kDL/pqXyTxNWqEf4aYXURPcVzr6baPpt9FD9kttLMXEdmta3gCXaTS+TVeQEDkM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1724762245; c=relaxed/simple; bh=vt5ZXD2hkLfV4bxt678rYoH6v1sFPWwpiQPY31g9zR4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=EFr6crLlJHwc0sC4JEczJb60qxaLQXUcx5LyUEQEtSdCnkEYNB50kYzWYwf1jbFdmpazfvlwg7bcYhaffp9GyNxq4v/whiq3huyeuOTWVbaTPiylz9eexdF3HcX231chmjxcZDG/tqahPpzwkq2D9aPQ/Eb+6WcXjLUAQ3S+PCE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b=DTumabjO; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b="DTumabjO" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DA02BC6106E; Tue, 27 Aug 2024 12:37:23 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1724762244; bh=vt5ZXD2hkLfV4bxt678rYoH6v1sFPWwpiQPY31g9zR4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=DTumabjOZ7os/fapgIXH9CXfPG09mvad1C+QXltoPrA5YHtm7KWbNag9stYiWPz56 znPiPss1T/jJhrBAUbWBJGPkfTWi5r2p9aAjjMLs1bmgA5YOci58wL+Z4zehXc18kA uoFYzkWnFa5W3s6czqdRF/MHHWt2Te3SHjxJvcpc= Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2024 14:37:21 +0200 From: Greg KH To: Takashi Iwai Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v6.6.y] ALSA: timer: Relax start tick time check for slave timer elements Message-ID: <2024082715-quickly-declared-749e@gregkh> References: <20240819154754.7629-1-tiwai@suse.de> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240819154754.7629-1-tiwai@suse.de> On Mon, Aug 19, 2024 at 05:47:45PM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote: > commit ccbfcac05866ebe6eb3bc6d07b51d4ed4fcde436 upstream. > > The recent addition of a sanity check for a too low start tick time > seems breaking some applications that uses aloop with a certain slave > timer setup. They may have the initial resolution 0, hence it's > treated as if it were a too low value. > > Relax and skip the check for the slave timer instance for addressing > the regression. > > Fixes: 4a63bd179fa8 ("ALSA: timer: Set lower bound of start tick time") > Cc: > Link: https://github.com/raspberrypi/linux/issues/6294 > Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20240810084833.10939-1-tiwai@suse.de > Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai > --- > > Greg, this is a backport for 6.6.y and older stable kernels that failed > to cherry-pick the original one. > Now queued up, thanks. greg k-h