From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0BFAB1C68C; Sun, 1 Sep 2024 16:32:46 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1725208366; cv=none; b=p3QXgKB/PfS8G+Nm5wts8AWx0FCwv2UFzjfxwU2gjj9klbSZbJNN+m304QjiEG0etLABhRB+s6KWgwu5pnYphb/wrFaT/1ofn/ymbUg7Dk1LhlTVvAWsack+kQeifentCT1NMCqi75vyjHi6+MFuVg3s70toxqrWp1eA2hJRJxI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1725208366; c=relaxed/simple; bh=NO1cm7OQ+iQYth+6Md9wWTNmktqh4iZTGCKrmZcT018=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=AHEmD5MjWxjrzIEQM1p8on+yNDxnly3jInJ91VJchkXQxqvT/huz3QUa/ZgTbqQfVB2xA1XzWyN1h8b+Wpi+IUOvz+fCk/tlfDdeRNmNk7EMx12cEDP70KocvzqmkJed7/nvUaUPD/TjDtVpVkBV7UpR3bsj3j44WPBloYAYAd0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b=V9s2P+xn; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b="V9s2P+xn" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 857C5C4CEC3; Sun, 1 Sep 2024 16:32:45 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1725208365; bh=NO1cm7OQ+iQYth+6Md9wWTNmktqh4iZTGCKrmZcT018=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=V9s2P+xnnIW63cXF1nQpwCI6QQ3mM2O1RUi8bdHCzD2VFDAWP9ROcMFMalBACz2+c qDDPMJ8HF1L/rPuDtmyI1zrT05RxfXyB+72oHSTSVci7PnKTW1Gcolqr6Yya49065i sMeXoAi7trqxFdBCoWcow91+H3L0ZYDKHTnfMSrk= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , patches@lists.linux.dev, Mat Martineau , "Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)" , Paolo Abeni Subject: [PATCH 6.10 029/149] mptcp: pm: ADD_ADDR 0 is not a new address Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2024 18:15:40 +0200 Message-ID: <20240901160818.559721719@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.46.0 In-Reply-To: <20240901160817.461957599@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20240901160817.461957599@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.67 X-stable: review X-Patchwork-Hint: ignore Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit 6.10-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) commit 57f86203b41c98b322119dfdbb1ec54ce5e3369b upstream. The ADD_ADDR 0 with the address from the initial subflow should not be considered as a new address: this is not something new. If the host receives it, it simply means that the address is available again. When receiving an ADD_ADDR for the ID 0, the PM already doesn't consider it as new by not incrementing the 'add_addr_accepted' counter. But the 'accept_addr' might not be set if the limit has already been reached: this can be bypassed in this case. But before, it is important to check that this ADD_ADDR for the ID 0 is for the same address as the initial subflow. If not, it is not something that should happen, and the ADD_ADDR can be ignored. Note that if an ADD_ADDR is received while there is already a subflow opened using the same address, this ADD_ADDR is ignored as well. It means that if multiple ADD_ADDR for ID 0 are received, there will not be any duplicated subflows created by the client. Fixes: d0876b2284cf ("mptcp: add the incoming RM_ADDR support") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Reviewed-by: Mat Martineau Signed-off-by: Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- net/mptcp/pm.c | 4 +++- net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c | 9 +++++++++ net/mptcp/protocol.h | 2 ++ 3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) --- a/net/mptcp/pm.c +++ b/net/mptcp/pm.c @@ -226,7 +226,9 @@ void mptcp_pm_add_addr_received(const st } else { __MPTCP_INC_STATS(sock_net((struct sock *)msk), MPTCP_MIB_ADDADDRDROP); } - } else if (!READ_ONCE(pm->accept_addr)) { + /* id0 should not have a different address */ + } else if ((addr->id == 0 && !mptcp_pm_nl_is_init_remote_addr(msk, addr)) || + (addr->id > 0 && !READ_ONCE(pm->accept_addr))) { mptcp_pm_announce_addr(msk, addr, true); mptcp_pm_add_addr_send_ack(msk); } else if (mptcp_pm_schedule_work(msk, MPTCP_PM_ADD_ADDR_RECEIVED)) { --- a/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c +++ b/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c @@ -760,6 +760,15 @@ static void mptcp_pm_nl_add_addr_receive } } +bool mptcp_pm_nl_is_init_remote_addr(struct mptcp_sock *msk, + const struct mptcp_addr_info *remote) +{ + struct mptcp_addr_info mpc_remote; + + remote_address((struct sock_common *)msk, &mpc_remote); + return mptcp_addresses_equal(&mpc_remote, remote, remote->port); +} + void mptcp_pm_nl_addr_send_ack(struct mptcp_sock *msk) { struct mptcp_subflow_context *subflow; --- a/net/mptcp/protocol.h +++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.h @@ -988,6 +988,8 @@ void mptcp_pm_add_addr_received(const st void mptcp_pm_add_addr_echoed(struct mptcp_sock *msk, const struct mptcp_addr_info *addr); void mptcp_pm_add_addr_send_ack(struct mptcp_sock *msk); +bool mptcp_pm_nl_is_init_remote_addr(struct mptcp_sock *msk, + const struct mptcp_addr_info *remote); void mptcp_pm_nl_addr_send_ack(struct mptcp_sock *msk); void mptcp_pm_rm_addr_received(struct mptcp_sock *msk, const struct mptcp_rm_list *rm_list);