Re: [PATCH 6.1.y] selftests: mptcp: join: validate event numbers

[Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>]

On Thu, Sep 05, 2024 at 11:33:46AM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 04, 2024 at 05:20:59PM +0200, Matthieu Baerts wrote:
> > Hi Greg,
> > 
> > On 04/09/2024 16:38, Greg KH wrote:
> > > On Wed, Sep 04, 2024 at 01:13:39PM +0200, Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) wrote:
> > >> commit 20ccc7c5f7a3aa48092441a4b182f9f40418392e upstream.
> > >>
> > > 
> > > This did not apply either.
> > > 
> > > I think I've gone through all of the 6.1 patches now.  If I've missed
> > > anything, please let me know.
> > It looks like there are some conflicts with the patches Sasha recently
> > added:
> > 
> > queue-6.1/selftests-mptcp-add-explicit-test-case-for-remove-re.patch
> > queue-6.1/selftests-mptcp-join-check-re-adding-init-endp-with-.patch
> > queue-6.1/selftests-mptcp-join-check-re-using-id-of-unused-add.patch
> > 
> > >From commit 0d8d8d5bcef1 ("Fixes for 6.1") from the stable-queue tree:
> > 
> > 
> > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git/commit/?id=0d8d8d5bcef1
> > 
> > I have also added these patches -- we can see patches with almost the
> > same name -- but I adapted them to the v6.1 kernel: it was possible to
> > apply them without conflicts, but they were causing issues because they
> > were calling functions that are not available in v6.1, or taking
> > different parameters.
> > 
> > Do you mind removing the ones from Sasha please? I hope that will not
> > cause any issues. After that, the two patches you had errors with should
> > apply without conflicts:
> 
> Ok, I've now dropped them, that actually fixes an error I was seeing
> where we had duplicated patches in the tree.
> 
> >  - selftests: mptcp: join: validate event numbers
> >  - selftests: mptcp: join: check re-re-adding ID 0 signal
> 
> I'll go add these now, thanks!

I just tried, and they still fail to apply.  How about we wait for this
next 6.1.y release to happen and then you rebase and see what I messed
up and send me the remaining ones as this is getting confusing on my
end...

thanks,

greg k-h