From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
To: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>, Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>,
Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 6.1] f2fs: Require FMODE_WRITE for atomic write ioctls
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2024 19:34:41 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241004193442.189774-1-ebiggers@kernel.org> (raw)
From: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
commit 4f5a100f87f32cb65d4bb1ad282a08c92f6f591e upstream.
The F2FS ioctls for starting and committing atomic writes check for
inode_owner_or_capable(), but this does not give LSMs like SELinux or
Landlock an opportunity to deny the write access - if the caller's FSUID
matches the inode's UID, inode_owner_or_capable() immediately returns true.
There are scenarios where LSMs want to deny a process the ability to write
particular files, even files that the FSUID of the process owns; but this
can currently partially be bypassed using atomic write ioctls in two ways:
- F2FS_IOC_START_ATOMIC_REPLACE + F2FS_IOC_COMMIT_ATOMIC_WRITE can
truncate an inode to size 0
- F2FS_IOC_START_ATOMIC_WRITE + F2FS_IOC_ABORT_ATOMIC_WRITE can revert
changes another process concurrently made to a file
Fix it by requiring FMODE_WRITE for these operations, just like for
F2FS_IOC_MOVE_RANGE. Since any legitimate caller should only be using these
ioctls when intending to write into the file, that seems unlikely to break
anything.
Fixes: 88b88a667971 ("f2fs: support atomic writes")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
---
fs/f2fs/file.c | 9 +++++++++
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/file.c b/fs/f2fs/file.c
index 62f2521cd955e..2982cc5b37d78 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/file.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/file.c
@@ -2103,10 +2103,13 @@ static int f2fs_ioc_start_atomic_write(struct file *filp)
struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi = F2FS_I_SB(inode);
struct inode *pinode;
loff_t isize;
int ret;
+ if (!(filp->f_mode & FMODE_WRITE))
+ return -EBADF;
+
if (!inode_owner_or_capable(mnt_userns, inode))
return -EACCES;
if (!S_ISREG(inode->i_mode))
return -EINVAL;
@@ -2200,10 +2203,13 @@ static int f2fs_ioc_commit_atomic_write(struct file *filp)
{
struct inode *inode = file_inode(filp);
struct user_namespace *mnt_userns = file_mnt_user_ns(filp);
int ret;
+ if (!(filp->f_mode & FMODE_WRITE))
+ return -EBADF;
+
if (!inode_owner_or_capable(mnt_userns, inode))
return -EACCES;
ret = mnt_want_write_file(filp);
if (ret)
@@ -2232,10 +2238,13 @@ static int f2fs_ioc_abort_atomic_write(struct file *filp)
{
struct inode *inode = file_inode(filp);
struct user_namespace *mnt_userns = file_mnt_user_ns(filp);
int ret;
+ if (!(filp->f_mode & FMODE_WRITE))
+ return -EBADF;
+
if (!inode_owner_or_capable(mnt_userns, inode))
return -EACCES;
ret = mnt_want_write_file(filp);
if (ret)
base-commit: aa4cd140bba57b7064b4c7a7141bebd336d32087
--
2.47.0.rc0.187.ge670bccf7e-goog
next reply other threads:[~2024-10-04 19:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-04 19:34 Eric Biggers [this message]
2024-10-06 0:22 ` [PATCH 6.1] f2fs: Require FMODE_WRITE for atomic write ioctls Sasha Levin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241004193442.189774-1-ebiggers@kernel.org \
--to=ebiggers@kernel.org \
--cc=chao@kernel.org \
--cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox