From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: chengzhihao1@huawei.com,jack@suse.cz,tytso@mit.edu
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] ext4: dax: fix overflowing extents beyond inode size when" failed to apply to 5.4-stable tree
Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2024 12:18:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2024100732-outscore-hardcore-8271@gregkh> (raw)
The patch below does not apply to the 5.4-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.
To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:
git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-5.4.y
git checkout FETCH_HEAD
git cherry-pick -x dda898d7ffe85931f9cca6d702a51f33717c501e
# <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.>
git commit -s
git send-email --to '<stable@vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2024100732-outscore-hardcore-8271@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 5.4.y' HEAD^..
Possible dependencies:
dda898d7ffe8 ("ext4: dax: fix overflowing extents beyond inode size when partially writing")
91562895f803 ("ext4: properly sync file size update after O_SYNC direct IO")
5899593f51e6 ("ext4: Fix occasional generic/418 failure")
60263d5889e6 ("iomap: fall back to buffered writes for invalidation failures")
54752de928c4 ("iomap: Only invalidate page cache pages on direct IO writes")
4209ae12b122 ("ext4: handle ext4_mark_inode_dirty errors")
9c94b39560c3 ("Merge tag 'ext4_for_linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tytso/ext4")
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From dda898d7ffe85931f9cca6d702a51f33717c501e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1@huawei.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2024 20:15:32 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] ext4: dax: fix overflowing extents beyond inode size when
partially writing
The dax_iomap_rw() does two things in each iteration: map written blocks
and copy user data to blocks. If the process is killed by user(See signal
handling in dax_iomap_iter()), the copied data will be returned and added
on inode size, which means that the length of written extents may exceed
the inode size, then fsck will fail. An example is given as:
dd if=/dev/urandom of=file bs=4M count=1
dax_iomap_rw
iomap_iter // round 1
ext4_iomap_begin
ext4_iomap_alloc // allocate 0~2M extents(written flag)
dax_iomap_iter // copy 2M data
iomap_iter // round 2
iomap_iter_advance
iter->pos += iter->processed // iter->pos = 2M
ext4_iomap_begin
ext4_iomap_alloc // allocate 2~4M extents(written flag)
dax_iomap_iter
fatal_signal_pending
done = iter->pos - iocb->ki_pos // done = 2M
ext4_handle_inode_extension
ext4_update_inode_size // inode size = 2M
fsck reports: Inode 13, i_size is 2097152, should be 4194304. Fix?
Fix the problem by truncating extents if the written length is smaller
than expected.
Fixes: 776722e85d3b ("ext4: DAX iomap write support")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=219136
Signed-off-by: Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1@huawei.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20240809121532.2105494-1-chengzhihao@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
diff --git a/fs/ext4/file.c b/fs/ext4/file.c
index c89e434db6b7..be061bb64067 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/file.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/file.c
@@ -334,10 +334,10 @@ static ssize_t ext4_handle_inode_extension(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset,
* Clean up the inode after DIO or DAX extending write has completed and the
* inode size has been updated using ext4_handle_inode_extension().
*/
-static void ext4_inode_extension_cleanup(struct inode *inode, ssize_t count)
+static void ext4_inode_extension_cleanup(struct inode *inode, bool need_trunc)
{
lockdep_assert_held_write(&inode->i_rwsem);
- if (count < 0) {
+ if (need_trunc) {
ext4_truncate_failed_write(inode);
/*
* If the truncate operation failed early, then the inode may
@@ -586,7 +586,7 @@ static ssize_t ext4_dio_write_iter(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *from)
* writeback of delalloc blocks.
*/
WARN_ON_ONCE(ret == -EIOCBQUEUED);
- ext4_inode_extension_cleanup(inode, ret);
+ ext4_inode_extension_cleanup(inode, ret < 0);
}
out:
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ ext4_dax_write_iter(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *from)
if (extend) {
ret = ext4_handle_inode_extension(inode, offset, ret);
- ext4_inode_extension_cleanup(inode, ret);
+ ext4_inode_extension_cleanup(inode, ret < (ssize_t)count);
}
out:
inode_unlock(inode);
reply other threads:[~2024-10-07 10:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2024100732-outscore-hardcore-8271@gregkh \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=chengzhihao1@huawei.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox