From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo <cascardo@igalia.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, "Jens Axboe" <axboe@kernel.dk>,
"Thomas Weißschuh" <linux@weissschuh.net>,
"Christoph Hellwig" <hch@infradead.org>,
"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
kernel-dev@igalia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.15,6.1 0/3] Fix block integrity violation of kobject rules
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2024 12:01:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2024100824-provable-unwed-aeea@gregkh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241002140123.2311471-1-cascardo@igalia.com>
On Wed, Oct 02, 2024 at 11:01:19AM -0300, Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo wrote:
> integrity_kobj did not have a release function and with
> CONFIG_DEBUG_KOBJECT_RELEASE, a use-after-free would be triggered as its
> holding struct gendisk would be freed without relying on its refcount.
>
> Thomas Weißschuh (3):
> blk-integrity: use sysfs_emit
> blk-integrity: convert to struct device_attribute
> blk-integrity: register sysfs attributes on struct device
>
> block/blk-integrity.c | 175 ++++++++++++++---------------------------
> block/blk.h | 10 +--
> block/genhd.c | 12 +--
> include/linux/blkdev.h | 3 -
> 4 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 134 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.34.1
>
>
This series is crazy to apply, you have 1 different patch for two
branches branch, and 2 for both, meaning I can't just apply a normal
series at all. Would you want to recieve such a thing?
Please resubmit these as 2 different series so they can be applied like
normal.
thanks,
greg k-h
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-08 10:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-02 14:01 [PATCH 5.15,6.1 0/3] Fix block integrity violation of kobject rules Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
2024-10-02 14:01 ` [PATCH 5.15,6.1 1/3] blk-integrity: use sysfs_emit Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
2024-10-02 14:01 ` [PATCH 5.15,6.1 2/3] blk-integrity: convert to struct device_attribute Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
2024-10-02 14:01 ` [PATCH 5.15 3/3] blk-integrity: register sysfs attributes on struct device Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
2024-10-02 14:01 ` [PATCH 6.1 " Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
2024-10-02 15:29 ` [PATCH 5.15,6.1 0/3] Fix block integrity violation of kobject rules Jens Axboe
2024-10-08 10:01 ` Greg KH [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2024100824-provable-unwed-aeea@gregkh \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=cascardo@igalia.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=kernel-dev@igalia.com \
--cc=linux@weissschuh.net \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).