From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 09F8118BC3B for ; Tue, 8 Oct 2024 10:32:45 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1728383566; cv=none; b=QfZEvv86bENiZDqdCJUcqFmXTXm8yzkrjs+tDiU0kMBpfyEj3piTBGrtoPOSnSzAoj11GNAUzktEWsMS5QuZ6U06ev2WzNeKX67f8uazDc2scBwsKxQBb3d6W5dHKoRs2AFgW746UUYCvCfI3eRhMPN4KDcZkart3hkTo5KAIgQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1728383566; c=relaxed/simple; bh=bZpkly3+sK3oxiyt3bCqkDJBUkLW7Pb6RYC20OBrOeI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=lIa9uAUCJieWrqCkMTMJY6nuLelIkKwNZxmgK1Rx45SXpLez5ZTPp2Nl52o9QBAO/FQS9GtqFdDhUaMwZMfun9mEzG3geGLljpipZh9weKvobxx8DfWEaC14DAM+svlVyRREAVu6wHasjAVZXuVpFYFg1dwO6jvVesqKmOznw/I= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b=EGREjzsV; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b="EGREjzsV" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 095F1C4CEC7; Tue, 8 Oct 2024 10:32:45 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1728383565; bh=bZpkly3+sK3oxiyt3bCqkDJBUkLW7Pb6RYC20OBrOeI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=EGREjzsVlFsrIT6QesqRnUSbD6Ss8PFiVxleAZq5TaAC3N/FbFp0fnbN7WHb4GLKV T79BjRakJHIV6aXhTM2IlN5P6nPq/B0trJC+DJscJbTjm5bj2AG8h2LLZzt7X8eCjC CvlNNaHFEchepkm5TmvyCn9vHxxCevqnULEfBAh4= Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2024 12:32:42 +0200 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Vegard Nossum Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, pavel@denx.de, cengiz.can@canonical.com, mheyne@amazon.de, mngyadam@amazon.com, kuntal.nayak@broadcom.com, ajay.kaher@broadcom.com, zsm@chromium.org, dan.carpenter@linaro.org, shivani.agarwal@broadcom.com, ahalaney@redhat.com, alsi@bang-olufsen.dk, ardb@kernel.org, axboe@kernel.dk, benjamin.gaignard@collabora.com, bli@bang-olufsen.dk, chengzhihao1@huawei.com, christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr, ebiggers@kernel.org, edumazet@google.com, fancer.lancer@gmail.com, florian.fainelli@broadcom.com, harshit.m.mogalapalli@oracle.com, hdegoede@redhat.com, horms@kernel.org, hverkuil-cisco@xs4all.nl, ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com, jgg@nvidia.com, kevin.tian@intel.com, kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com, kuba@kernel.org, luiz.von.dentz@intel.com, md.iqbal.hossain@intel.com, mpearson-lenovo@squebb.ca, nicolinc@nvidia.com, pablo@netfilter.org, rfoss@kernel.org, richard@nod.at, tfiga@chromium.org, vladimir.oltean@nxp.com, xiaolei.wang@windriver.com, yanjun.zhu@linux.dev, yi.zhang@redhat.com, yu.c.chen@intel.com, yukuai3@huawei.com Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 6.6.y 00/15] Some missing CVE fixes Message-ID: <2024100824-wager-graceful-37e1@gregkh> References: <20241002150606.11385-1-vegard.nossum@oracle.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20241002150606.11385-1-vegard.nossum@oracle.com> On Wed, Oct 02, 2024 at 05:05:51PM +0200, Vegard Nossum wrote: > Hi, > > We noticed some cases where a mainline commit that fixes a CVE has a > Fixes: tag pointing to a commit that has been backported to 6.6 but > where the fix is not present. > > Harshit and I have backported some of these patches. > > We are not subsystem experts and that's why we have marked this > series as RFC -- any review or feedback is welcome. We've tried to > document the conflicts and their causes in the changelogs. We haven't > done targeted testing beyond our usual stable tests, but this > includes for example the netfilter test suite, which did not show any > new failures. > > Greg: feel free to take these patches or leave it as you want. > Conflict resolution always comes with the risk of missing something > and we want to be up-front about that. On the other hand, these were > identified as CVE fixes so presumably we're not the only ones who > want them. I've taken the ones that were not already in the stable queues, thanks for the backports! greg k-h