From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
To: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <davem@davemloft.net>, <kuba@kernel.org>, <pabeni@redhat.com>,
<edumazet@google.com>, <jiri@nvidia.com>,
<jacob.e.keller@intel.com>, <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
<sashal@kernel.org>, <vkarri@nvidia.com>, <nogikh@google.com>,
Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
Subject: [PATCH stable 6.1 2/2] devlink: bump the instance index directly when iterating
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2024 14:36:25 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241015113625.613416-3-idosch@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241015113625.613416-1-idosch@nvidia.com>
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
commit d772781964415c63759572b917e21c4f7ec08d9f upstream.
xa_find_after() is designed to handle multi-index entries correctly.
If a xarray has two entries one which spans indexes 0-3 and one at
index 4 xa_find_after(0) will return the entry at index 4.
Having to juggle the two callbacks, however, is unnecessary in case
of the devlink xarray, as there is 1:1 relationship with indexes.
Always use xa_find() and increment the index manually.
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
[ Ido: Moved the changes from core.c and devl_internal.h to leftover.c ]
Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
---
net/devlink/leftover.c | 35 ++++++++++-------------------------
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/devlink/leftover.c b/net/devlink/leftover.c
index 68210b5fab8e..f1c6bd727a83 100644
--- a/net/devlink/leftover.c
+++ b/net/devlink/leftover.c
@@ -289,15 +289,13 @@ void devl_unlock(struct devlink *devlink)
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(devl_unlock);
static struct devlink *
-devlinks_xa_find_get(struct net *net, unsigned long *indexp,
- void * (*xa_find_fn)(struct xarray *, unsigned long *,
- unsigned long, xa_mark_t))
+devlinks_xa_find_get(struct net *net, unsigned long *indexp)
{
- struct devlink *devlink;
+ struct devlink *devlink = NULL;
rcu_read_lock();
retry:
- devlink = xa_find_fn(&devlinks, indexp, ULONG_MAX, DEVLINK_REGISTERED);
+ devlink = xa_find(&devlinks, indexp, ULONG_MAX, DEVLINK_REGISTERED);
if (!devlink)
goto unlock;
@@ -306,31 +304,20 @@ devlinks_xa_find_get(struct net *net, unsigned long *indexp,
* This prevents live-lock of devlink_unregister() wait for completion.
*/
if (xa_get_mark(&devlinks, *indexp, DEVLINK_UNREGISTERING))
- goto retry;
+ goto next;
- /* For a possible retry, the xa_find_after() should be always used */
- xa_find_fn = xa_find_after;
if (!devlink_try_get(devlink))
- goto retry;
+ goto next;
if (!net_eq(devlink_net(devlink), net)) {
devlink_put(devlink);
- goto retry;
+ goto next;
}
unlock:
rcu_read_unlock();
return devlink;
-}
-
-static struct devlink *devlinks_xa_find_get_first(struct net *net,
- unsigned long *indexp)
-{
- return devlinks_xa_find_get(net, indexp, xa_find);
-}
-
-static struct devlink *devlinks_xa_find_get_next(struct net *net,
- unsigned long *indexp)
-{
- return devlinks_xa_find_get(net, indexp, xa_find_after);
+next:
+ (*indexp)++;
+ goto retry;
}
/* Iterate over devlink pointers which were possible to get reference to.
@@ -338,9 +325,7 @@ static struct devlink *devlinks_xa_find_get_next(struct net *net,
* in loop body in order to release the reference.
*/
#define devlinks_xa_for_each_registered_get(net, index, devlink) \
- for (index = 0, \
- devlink = devlinks_xa_find_get_first(net, &index); \
- devlink; devlink = devlinks_xa_find_get_next(net, &index))
+ for (index = 0; (devlink = devlinks_xa_find_get(net, &index)); index++)
static struct devlink *devlink_get_from_attrs(struct net *net,
struct nlattr **attrs)
--
2.47.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-15 11:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-15 11:36 [PATCH stable 6.1 0/2] devlink: Fix RCU stall when unregistering a devlink instance Ido Schimmel
2024-10-15 11:36 ` [PATCH stable 6.1 1/2] devlink: drop the filter argument from devlinks_xa_find_get Ido Schimmel
2024-10-15 11:36 ` Ido Schimmel [this message]
2024-10-18 8:48 ` [PATCH stable 6.1 0/2] devlink: Fix RCU stall when unregistering a devlink instance Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241015113625.613416-3-idosch@nvidia.com \
--to=idosch@nvidia.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jacob.e.keller@intel.com \
--cc=jiri@nvidia.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=nogikh@google.com \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vkarri@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox