public inbox for stable@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
To: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <davem@davemloft.net>, <kuba@kernel.org>, <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	<edumazet@google.com>, <jiri@nvidia.com>,
	<jacob.e.keller@intel.com>, <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	<sashal@kernel.org>, <vkarri@nvidia.com>, <nogikh@google.com>,
	Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
Subject: [PATCH stable 6.1 2/2] devlink: bump the instance index directly when iterating
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2024 14:36:25 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241015113625.613416-3-idosch@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241015113625.613416-1-idosch@nvidia.com>

From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>

commit d772781964415c63759572b917e21c4f7ec08d9f upstream.

xa_find_after() is designed to handle multi-index entries correctly.
If a xarray has two entries one which spans indexes 0-3 and one at
index 4 xa_find_after(0) will return the entry at index 4.

Having to juggle the two callbacks, however, is unnecessary in case
of the devlink xarray, as there is 1:1 relationship with indexes.

Always use xa_find() and increment the index manually.

Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
[ Ido: Moved the changes from core.c and devl_internal.h to leftover.c ]
Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
---
 net/devlink/leftover.c | 35 ++++++++++-------------------------
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/devlink/leftover.c b/net/devlink/leftover.c
index 68210b5fab8e..f1c6bd727a83 100644
--- a/net/devlink/leftover.c
+++ b/net/devlink/leftover.c
@@ -289,15 +289,13 @@ void devl_unlock(struct devlink *devlink)
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(devl_unlock);
 
 static struct devlink *
-devlinks_xa_find_get(struct net *net, unsigned long *indexp,
-		     void * (*xa_find_fn)(struct xarray *, unsigned long *,
-					  unsigned long, xa_mark_t))
+devlinks_xa_find_get(struct net *net, unsigned long *indexp)
 {
-	struct devlink *devlink;
+	struct devlink *devlink = NULL;
 
 	rcu_read_lock();
 retry:
-	devlink = xa_find_fn(&devlinks, indexp, ULONG_MAX, DEVLINK_REGISTERED);
+	devlink = xa_find(&devlinks, indexp, ULONG_MAX, DEVLINK_REGISTERED);
 	if (!devlink)
 		goto unlock;
 
@@ -306,31 +304,20 @@ devlinks_xa_find_get(struct net *net, unsigned long *indexp,
 	 * This prevents live-lock of devlink_unregister() wait for completion.
 	 */
 	if (xa_get_mark(&devlinks, *indexp, DEVLINK_UNREGISTERING))
-		goto retry;
+		goto next;
 
-	/* For a possible retry, the xa_find_after() should be always used */
-	xa_find_fn = xa_find_after;
 	if (!devlink_try_get(devlink))
-		goto retry;
+		goto next;
 	if (!net_eq(devlink_net(devlink), net)) {
 		devlink_put(devlink);
-		goto retry;
+		goto next;
 	}
 unlock:
 	rcu_read_unlock();
 	return devlink;
-}
-
-static struct devlink *devlinks_xa_find_get_first(struct net *net,
-						  unsigned long *indexp)
-{
-	return devlinks_xa_find_get(net, indexp, xa_find);
-}
-
-static struct devlink *devlinks_xa_find_get_next(struct net *net,
-						 unsigned long *indexp)
-{
-	return devlinks_xa_find_get(net, indexp, xa_find_after);
+next:
+	(*indexp)++;
+	goto retry;
 }
 
 /* Iterate over devlink pointers which were possible to get reference to.
@@ -338,9 +325,7 @@ static struct devlink *devlinks_xa_find_get_next(struct net *net,
  * in loop body in order to release the reference.
  */
 #define devlinks_xa_for_each_registered_get(net, index, devlink)		\
-	for (index = 0,								\
-	     devlink = devlinks_xa_find_get_first(net, &index);	\
-	     devlink; devlink = devlinks_xa_find_get_next(net, &index))
+	for (index = 0; (devlink = devlinks_xa_find_get(net, &index)); index++)
 
 static struct devlink *devlink_get_from_attrs(struct net *net,
 					      struct nlattr **attrs)
-- 
2.47.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-10-15 11:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-10-15 11:36 [PATCH stable 6.1 0/2] devlink: Fix RCU stall when unregistering a devlink instance Ido Schimmel
2024-10-15 11:36 ` [PATCH stable 6.1 1/2] devlink: drop the filter argument from devlinks_xa_find_get Ido Schimmel
2024-10-15 11:36 ` Ido Schimmel [this message]
2024-10-18  8:48 ` [PATCH stable 6.1 0/2] devlink: Fix RCU stall when unregistering a devlink instance Greg KH

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20241015113625.613416-3-idosch@nvidia.com \
    --to=idosch@nvidia.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jacob.e.keller@intel.com \
    --cc=jiri@nvidia.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=nogikh@google.com \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=sashal@kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vkarri@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox