From: "Michał Pecio" <michal.pecio@gmail.com>
To: mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com
Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] xhci: Mitigate failed set dequeue pointer commands
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2024 08:40:07 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241017084007.53d3fedd@foxbook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241016140000.783905-3-mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com>
> Avoid xHC host from processing a cancelled URB by always turning
> cancelled URB TDs into no-op TRBs before queuing a 'Set TR Deq'
> command.
>
> If the command fails then xHC will start processing the cancelled TD
> instead of skipping it once endpoint is restarted, causing issues like
> Babble error.
>
> This is not a complete solution as a failed 'Set TR Deq' command does
> not guarantee xHC TRB caches are cleared.
Hmm, wouldn't a long and partially cached TD basically become corrupted
by this overwrite?
For instance, No Op following a chain bit TRB is prohibited by 4.11.7.
4.11.5.1 even goes as far as saying that there are no constraints on
the order in which TRBs are fetched from the ring, not sure how much
"out of order" it can be and if a cached TD could be left with a hole?
If the reason of Set TR Deq failure is an earlier Stop Endpoint failure,
the xHC is executing this TD right now. Or maybe the next one - I guess
the driver already risks UB when it misses any Stop EP failure.
If it didn't fail, xHC may store some "state" which allows it to restart
a TRB stopped in the middle. It might not expect the TRB to change.
Actually, it would *almost* be better to deal with it by simply leaving
the TRB on the ring and waiting for it to complete. Problem is when it
doesn't execute soon, or ever, leaving the urb_dequeue() caller hanging.
Regards,
Michal
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-17 6:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20241016140000.783905-1-mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com>
2024-10-16 13:59 ` [PATCH 1/4] xhci: Fix incorrect stream context type macro Mathias Nyman
2024-10-16 13:59 ` [PATCH 2/4] xhci: Mitigate failed set dequeue pointer commands Mathias Nyman
2024-10-17 6:40 ` Michał Pecio [this message]
2024-10-17 13:10 ` Mathias Nyman
2024-10-17 16:14 ` Michał Pecio
2024-10-18 9:59 ` Mathias Nyman
2024-10-16 14:00 ` [PATCH 4/4] xhci: dbc: honor usb transfer size boundaries Mathias Nyman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241017084007.53d3fedd@foxbook \
--to=michal.pecio@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox