From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com,andrew.cooper3@citrix.com,brgerst@gmail.com,dave.hansen@linux.intel.com,mingo@kernel.org,rtgill82@gmail.com
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] x86/bugs: Use code segment selector for VERW operand" failed to apply to 6.1-stable tree
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2024 10:13:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2024102128-omega-phosphate-db6c@gregkh> (raw)
The patch below does not apply to the 6.1-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.
To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:
git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.1.y
git checkout FETCH_HEAD
git cherry-pick -x e4d2102018542e3ae5e297bc6e229303abff8a0f
# <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.>
git commit -s
git send-email --to '<stable@vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2024102128-omega-phosphate-db6c@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.1.y' HEAD^..
Possible dependencies:
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From e4d2102018542e3ae5e297bc6e229303abff8a0f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2024 09:10:31 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] x86/bugs: Use code segment selector for VERW operand
Robert Gill reported below #GP in 32-bit mode when dosemu software was
executing vm86() system call:
general protection fault: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
CPU: 4 PID: 4610 Comm: dosemu.bin Not tainted 6.6.21-gentoo-x86 #1
Hardware name: Dell Inc. PowerEdge 1950/0H723K, BIOS 2.7.0 10/30/2010
EIP: restore_all_switch_stack+0xbe/0xcf
EAX: 00000000 EBX: 00000000 ECX: 00000000 EDX: 00000000
ESI: 00000000 EDI: 00000000 EBP: 00000000 ESP: ff8affdc
DS: 0000 ES: 0000 FS: 0000 GS: 0033 SS: 0068 EFLAGS: 00010046
CR0: 80050033 CR2: 00c2101c CR3: 04b6d000 CR4: 000406d0
Call Trace:
show_regs+0x70/0x78
die_addr+0x29/0x70
exc_general_protection+0x13c/0x348
exc_bounds+0x98/0x98
handle_exception+0x14d/0x14d
exc_bounds+0x98/0x98
restore_all_switch_stack+0xbe/0xcf
exc_bounds+0x98/0x98
restore_all_switch_stack+0xbe/0xcf
This only happens in 32-bit mode when VERW based mitigations like MDS/RFDS
are enabled. This is because segment registers with an arbitrary user value
can result in #GP when executing VERW. Intel SDM vol. 2C documents the
following behavior for VERW instruction:
#GP(0) - If a memory operand effective address is outside the CS, DS, ES,
FS, or GS segment limit.
CLEAR_CPU_BUFFERS macro executes VERW instruction before returning to user
space. Use %cs selector to reference VERW operand. This ensures VERW will
not #GP for an arbitrary user %ds.
[ mingo: Fixed the SOB chain. ]
Fixes: a0e2dab44d22 ("x86/entry_32: Add VERW just before userspace transition")
Reported-by: Robert Gill <rtgill82@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.10+
Closes: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218707
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/8c77ccfd-d561-45a1-8ed5-6b75212c7a58@leemhuis.info/
Suggested-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Suggested-by: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/nospec-branch.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/nospec-branch.h
index ff5f1ecc7d1e..96b410b1d4e8 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/nospec-branch.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/nospec-branch.h
@@ -323,7 +323,16 @@
* Note: Only the memory operand variant of VERW clears the CPU buffers.
*/
.macro CLEAR_CPU_BUFFERS
- ALTERNATIVE "", __stringify(verw _ASM_RIP(mds_verw_sel)), X86_FEATURE_CLEAR_CPU_BUF
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
+ ALTERNATIVE "", "verw mds_verw_sel(%rip)", X86_FEATURE_CLEAR_CPU_BUF
+#else
+ /*
+ * In 32bit mode, the memory operand must be a %cs reference. The data
+ * segments may not be usable (vm86 mode), and the stack segment may not
+ * be flat (ESPFIX32).
+ */
+ ALTERNATIVE "", "verw %cs:mds_verw_sel", X86_FEATURE_CLEAR_CPU_BUF
+#endif
.endm
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
next reply other threads:[~2024-10-21 8:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-21 8:13 gregkh [this message]
2024-10-21 16:45 ` FAILED: patch "[PATCH] x86/bugs: Use code segment selector for VERW operand" failed to apply to 6.1-stable tree Pawan Gupta
2024-10-21 18:53 ` [PATCH 6.1.y] x86/bugs: Use code segment selector for VERW operand Pawan Gupta
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2024102128-omega-phosphate-db6c@gregkh \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=brgerst@gmail.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com \
--cc=rtgill82@gmail.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox