From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: <ira.weiny@intel.com>, Gregory Price <gourry@gourry.net>,
<stable@vger.kernel.org>, Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>,
Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>,
Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com>,
Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>,
<linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] cxl/port: Fix CXL port initialization order when the subsystem is built-in
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2024 10:42:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241024104237.000067f9@Huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <172964780249.81806.11601867702278939388.stgit@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com>
On Tue, 22 Oct 2024 18:43:24 -0700
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> wrote:
> When the CXL subsystem is built-in the module init order is determined
> by Makefile order. That order violates expectations. The expectation is
> that cxl_acpi and cxl_mem can race to attach and that if cxl_acpi wins
> the race cxl_mem will find the enabled CXL root ports it needs and if
> cxl_acpi loses the race it will retrigger cxl_mem to attach via
> cxl_bus_rescan(). That only works if cxl_acpi can assume ports are
> enabled immediately upon cxl_acpi_probe() return. That in turn can only
> happen in the CONFIG_CXL_ACPI=y case if the cxl_port object appears
> before the cxl_acpi object in the Makefile.
>
> Fix up the order to prevent initialization failures, and make sure that
> cxl_port is built-in if cxl_acpi is also built-in.
>
> As for what contributed to this not being found earlier, the CXL
> regression environment, cxl_test, builds all CXL functionality as a
> module to allow to symbol mocking and other dynamic reload tests. As a
> result there is no regression coverage for the built-in case.
>
> Reported-by: Gregory Price <gourry@gourry.net>
> Closes: http://lore.kernel.org/20241004212504.1246-1-gourry@gourry.net
> Tested-by: Gregory Price <gourry@gourry.net>
> Fixes: 8dd2bc0f8e02 ("cxl/mem: Add the cxl_mem driver")
I don't like this due to likely long term fragility, but any other
solution is probably more painful. Long term we should really get
a regression test for these ordering issues in place in one of
the CIs.
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
> Cc: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>
> Cc: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
> Cc: Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com>
> Cc: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>
> Cc: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/cxl/Kconfig | 1 +
> drivers/cxl/Makefile | 20 ++++++++++++++------
> 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/Kconfig b/drivers/cxl/Kconfig
> index 29c192f20082..876469e23f7a 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/Kconfig
> @@ -60,6 +60,7 @@ config CXL_ACPI
> default CXL_BUS
> select ACPI_TABLE_LIB
> select ACPI_HMAT
> + select CXL_PORT
> help
> Enable support for host managed device memory (HDM) resources
> published by a platform's ACPI CXL memory layout description. See
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/Makefile b/drivers/cxl/Makefile
> index db321f48ba52..2caa90fa4bf2 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/Makefile
> @@ -1,13 +1,21 @@
> # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +
> +# Order is important here for the built-in case:
> +# - 'core' first for fundamental init
> +# - 'port' before platform root drivers like 'acpi' so that CXL-root ports
> +# are immediately enabled
> +# - 'mem' and 'pmem' before endpoint drivers so that memdevs are
> +# immediately enabled
> +# - 'pci' last, also mirrors the hardware enumeration hierarchy
> obj-y += core/
> -obj-$(CONFIG_CXL_PCI) += cxl_pci.o
> -obj-$(CONFIG_CXL_MEM) += cxl_mem.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_CXL_PORT) += cxl_port.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_CXL_ACPI) += cxl_acpi.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_CXL_PMEM) += cxl_pmem.o
> -obj-$(CONFIG_CXL_PORT) += cxl_port.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_CXL_MEM) += cxl_mem.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_CXL_PCI) += cxl_pci.o
>
> -cxl_mem-y := mem.o
> -cxl_pci-y := pci.o
> +cxl_port-y := port.o
> cxl_acpi-y := acpi.o
> cxl_pmem-y := pmem.o security.o
> -cxl_port-y := port.o
> +cxl_mem-y := mem.o
> +cxl_pci-y := pci.o
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-24 9:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-23 1:43 [PATCH v2 0/6] cxl: Initialization and shutdown fixes Dan Williams
2024-10-23 1:43 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] cxl/port: Fix CXL port initialization order when the subsystem is built-in Dan Williams
2024-10-24 9:42 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2024-10-24 16:19 ` Dan Williams
2024-10-24 16:39 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-10-24 10:36 ` Alejandro Lucero Palau
2024-10-24 16:32 ` Dan Williams
2024-10-25 8:43 ` Alejandro Lucero Palau
2024-10-25 15:19 ` Dan Williams
2024-10-24 14:14 ` Ira Weiny
2024-10-25 19:32 ` [PATCH v3 " Dan Williams
2024-10-23 1:43 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] cxl/port: Fix use-after-free, permit out-of-order decoder shutdown Dan Williams
2024-10-24 15:55 ` Ira Weiny
2024-10-23 13:12 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] cxl: Initialization and shutdown fixes Robert Richter
2024-10-23 16:00 ` Gregory Price
2024-10-23 20:34 ` Dan Williams
2024-10-24 11:56 ` Robert Richter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241024104237.000067f9@Huawei.com \
--to=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=gourry@gourry.net \
--cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox