WTF: patch "[PATCH] riscv: Remove duplicated GET_RM" was seriously submitted to be applied to the 6.11-stable tree?

[<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>]

The patch below was submitted to be applied to the 6.11-stable tree.

I fail to see how this patch meets the stable kernel rules as found at
Documentation/process/stable-kernel-rules.rst.

I could be totally wrong, and if so, please respond to 
<stable@vger.kernel.org> and let me know why this patch should be
applied.  Otherwise, it is now dropped from my patch queues, never to be
seen again.

thanks,

greg k-h

------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------

From 164f66de6bb6ef454893f193c898dc8f1da6d18b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chunyan Zhang <zhangchunyan@iscas.ac.cn>
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2024 17:41:39 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] riscv: Remove duplicated GET_RM

The macro GET_RM defined twice in this file, one can be removed.

Reviewed-by: Alexandre Ghiti <alexghiti@rivosinc.com>
Signed-off-by: Chunyan Zhang <zhangchunyan@iscas.ac.cn>
Fixes: 956d705dd279 ("riscv: Unaligned load/store handling for M_MODE")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241008094141.549248-3-zhangchunyan@iscas.ac.cn
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>

diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/traps_misaligned.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/traps_misaligned.c
index d4fd8af7aaf5..1b9867136b61 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kernel/traps_misaligned.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/traps_misaligned.c
@@ -136,8 +136,6 @@
 #define REG_PTR(insn, pos, regs)	\
 	(ulong *)((ulong)(regs) + REG_OFFSET(insn, pos))
 
-#define GET_RM(insn)			(((insn) >> 12) & 7)
-
 #define GET_RS1(insn, regs)		(*REG_PTR(insn, SH_RS1, regs))
 #define GET_RS2(insn, regs)		(*REG_PTR(insn, SH_RS2, regs))
 #define GET_RS1S(insn, regs)		(*REG_PTR(RVC_RS1S(insn), 0, regs))