[PATCH 5.10 33/82] pwm: imx-tpm: Use correct MODULO value for EPWM mode

[Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>]

5.10-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Erik Schumacher <erik.schumacher@iris-sensing.com>

commit cc6a931d1f3b412263d515fd93b21fc0ca5147fe upstream.

The modulo register defines the period of the edge-aligned PWM mode
(which is the only mode implemented). The reference manual states:
"The EPWM period is determined by (MOD + 0001h) ..." So the value that
is written to the MOD register must therefore be one less than the
calculated period length. Return -EINVAL if the calculated length is
already zero.
A correct MODULO value is particularly relevant if the PWM has to output
a high frequency due to a low period value.

Fixes: 738a1cfec2ed ("pwm: Add i.MX TPM PWM driver support")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Erik Schumacher <erik.schumacher@iris-sensing.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1a3890966d68b9f800d457cbf095746627495e18.camel@iris-sensing.com
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <ukleinek@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 drivers/pwm/pwm-imx-tpm.c |    4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-imx-tpm.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-imx-tpm.c
@@ -106,7 +106,9 @@ static int pwm_imx_tpm_round_state(struc
 	p->prescale = prescale;
 
 	period_count = (clock_unit + ((1 << prescale) >> 1)) >> prescale;
-	p->mod = period_count;
+	if (period_count == 0)
+		return -EINVAL;
+	p->mod = period_count - 1;
 
 	/* calculate real period HW can support */
 	tmp = (u64)period_count << prescale;