Re: [PATCH] Revert "drm/amd/pm: correct the workload setting"

[Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>]

On Sat, Nov 16, 2024 at 10:07:38AM -0500, Alex Deucher wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 16, 2024 at 9:51 AM Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Nov 16, 2024 at 08:48:58AM -0500, Alex Deucher wrote:
> > > On Sat, Nov 16, 2024 at 8:47 AM Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, Nov 16, 2024 at 08:04:27AM -0500, Alex Deucher wrote:
> > > > > This reverts commit 4a18810d0b6fb2b853b75d21117040a783f2ab66.
> > > > >
> > > > > This causes a regression in the workload selection.
> > > > > A more extensive fix is being worked on for mainline.
> > > > > For stable, revert.
> > > >
> > > > Why is this not reverted in Linus's tree too?  Why is this only for a
> > > > stable tree?  Why can't we take what will be in 6.12?
> > >
> > > I'm about to send out the patch for 6.12 as well, but I want to make
> > > sure it gets into 6.11 before it's EOL.
> >
> > If 6.11 is EOL, there's no need to worry about it :)
> 
> End users care :)
> 
> >
> > I'd much prefer to take the real patch please.
> 
> Here's the PR I sent to Dave and Sima:
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2024-November/477927.html
> I didn't cc stable because I had already send this patch to stable in
> this thread.

I'd much rather prefer to match up with what is in Linus's tree.  If you
have the git id that lands in Linus's tree, please let us know and we
can take that.  This way we can keep 6.11 and 6.12 in sync, right?

thanks,

greg k-h