From: Vasiliy Kovalev <kovalev@altlinux.org>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: lvc-project@linuxtesting.org, dutyrok@altlinux.org,
gerben@altlinux.org, kovalev@altlinux.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] ext4: fix error message when rejecting the default hash
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2024 13:20:50 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241118102050.16077-4-kovalev@altlinux.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241118102050.16077-1-kovalev@altlinux.org>
From: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@suse.de>
[ Upstream commit a2187431c395cdfbf144e3536f25468c64fc7cfa ]
Commit 985b67cd8639 ("ext4: filesystems without casefold feature cannot
be mounted with siphash") properly rejects volumes where
s_def_hash_version is set to DX_HASH_SIPHASH, but the check and the
error message should not look into casefold setup - a filesystem should
never have DX_HASH_SIPHASH as the default hash. Fix it and, since we
are there, move the check to ext4_hash_info_init.
Fixes:985b67cd8639 ("ext4: filesystems without casefold feature cannot
be mounted with siphash")
Signed-off-by: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@suse.de>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/87jzg1en6j.fsf_-_@mailhost.krisman.be
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Vasiliy Kovalev <kovalev@altlinux.org>
---
fs/ext4/ext4.h | 1 +
fs/ext4/super.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++-----------
2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/ext4.h b/fs/ext4/ext4.h
index 72abb8d6caf75..d5706aedf4fef 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/ext4.h
+++ b/fs/ext4/ext4.h
@@ -2449,6 +2449,7 @@ static inline __le16 ext4_rec_len_to_disk(unsigned len, unsigned blocksize)
#define DX_HASH_HALF_MD4_UNSIGNED 4
#define DX_HASH_TEA_UNSIGNED 5
#define DX_HASH_SIPHASH 6
+#define DX_HASH_LAST DX_HASH_SIPHASH
static inline u32 ext4_chksum(struct ext4_sb_info *sbi, u32 crc,
const void *address, unsigned int length)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/super.c b/fs/ext4/super.c
index 68070b1859803..3e4b9bf101454 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/super.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/super.c
@@ -3559,14 +3559,6 @@ int ext4_feature_set_ok(struct super_block *sb, int readonly)
}
#endif
- if (EXT4_SB(sb)->s_es->s_def_hash_version == DX_HASH_SIPHASH &&
- !ext4_has_feature_casefold(sb)) {
- ext4_msg(sb, KERN_ERR,
- "Filesystem without casefold feature cannot be "
- "mounted with siphash");
- return 0;
- }
-
if (readonly)
return 1;
@@ -5050,16 +5042,27 @@ static int ext4_load_super(struct super_block *sb, ext4_fsblk_t *lsb,
return ret;
}
-static void ext4_hash_info_init(struct super_block *sb)
+static int ext4_hash_info_init(struct super_block *sb)
{
struct ext4_sb_info *sbi = EXT4_SB(sb);
struct ext4_super_block *es = sbi->s_es;
unsigned int i;
+ sbi->s_def_hash_version = es->s_def_hash_version;
+
+ if (sbi->s_def_hash_version > DX_HASH_LAST) {
+ ext4_msg(sb, KERN_ERR,
+ "Invalid default hash set in the superblock");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ } else if (sbi->s_def_hash_version == DX_HASH_SIPHASH) {
+ ext4_msg(sb, KERN_ERR,
+ "SIPHASH is not a valid default hash value");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
for (i = 0; i < 4; i++)
sbi->s_hash_seed[i] = le32_to_cpu(es->s_hash_seed[i]);
- sbi->s_def_hash_version = es->s_def_hash_version;
if (ext4_has_feature_dir_index(sb)) {
i = le32_to_cpu(es->s_flags);
if (i & EXT2_FLAGS_UNSIGNED_HASH)
@@ -5077,6 +5080,7 @@ static void ext4_hash_info_init(struct super_block *sb)
#endif
}
}
+ return 0;
}
static int __ext4_fill_super(struct fs_context *fc, struct super_block *sb)
@@ -5234,7 +5238,9 @@ static int __ext4_fill_super(struct fs_context *fc, struct super_block *sb)
sbi->s_addr_per_block_bits = ilog2(EXT4_ADDR_PER_BLOCK(sb));
sbi->s_desc_per_block_bits = ilog2(EXT4_DESC_PER_BLOCK(sb));
- ext4_hash_info_init(sb);
+ err = ext4_hash_info_init(sb);
+ if (err)
+ goto failed_mount;
if (ext4_handle_clustersize(sb))
goto failed_mount;
--
2.33.8
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
To: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Vasiliy Kovalev <kovalev@altlinux.org>, Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] ext4: fix error message when rejecting the default hash
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2024 23:36:35 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241118102050.16077-4-kovalev@altlinux.org> (raw)
Message-ID: <20241119043635.g8uMBK5UglL8AI2bA8e9dlnTS8yntkUP1syTTSIvgjQ@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241118102050.16077-4-kovalev@altlinux.org>
[ Sasha's backport helper bot ]
Hi,
The upstream commit SHA1 provided is correct: a2187431c395cdfbf144e3536f25468c64fc7cfa
WARNING: Author mismatch between patch and upstream commit:
Backport author: Vasiliy Kovalev <kovalev@altlinux.org>
Commit author: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@suse.de>
Commit in newer trees:
|-----------------|----------------------------------------------|
| 6.11.y | Present (different SHA1: b5778b2b428a) |
|-----------------|----------------------------------------------|
Note: The patch differs from the upstream commit:
---
--- - 2024-11-18 22:36:26.886622930 -0500
+++ /tmp/tmp.pApf2ytKkR 2024-11-18 22:36:26.882290161 -0500
@@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
+[ Upstream commit a2187431c395cdfbf144e3536f25468c64fc7cfa ]
+
Commit 985b67cd8639 ("ext4: filesystems without casefold feature cannot
be mounted with siphash") properly rejects volumes where
s_def_hash_version is set to DX_HASH_SIPHASH, but the check and the
@@ -11,16 +13,17 @@
Signed-off-by: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@suse.de>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/87jzg1en6j.fsf_-_@mailhost.krisman.be
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
+Signed-off-by: Vasiliy Kovalev <kovalev@altlinux.org>
---
fs/ext4/ext4.h | 1 +
- fs/ext4/super.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++----------
- 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
+ fs/ext4/super.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++-----------
+ 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/ext4.h b/fs/ext4/ext4.h
-index 481ece3660eb7..7ac668d4ce83c 100644
+index 72abb8d6caf75..d5706aedf4fef 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/ext4.h
+++ b/fs/ext4/ext4.h
-@@ -2462,6 +2462,7 @@ static inline __le16 ext4_rec_len_to_disk(unsigned len, unsigned blocksize)
+@@ -2449,6 +2449,7 @@ static inline __le16 ext4_rec_len_to_disk(unsigned len, unsigned blocksize)
#define DX_HASH_HALF_MD4_UNSIGNED 4
#define DX_HASH_TEA_UNSIGNED 5
#define DX_HASH_SIPHASH 6
@@ -29,13 +32,13 @@
static inline u32 ext4_chksum(struct ext4_sb_info *sbi, u32 crc,
const void *address, unsigned int length)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/super.c b/fs/ext4/super.c
-index 58423e6bf3d07..adc5046fe9dd5 100644
+index 68070b1859803..3e4b9bf101454 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/super.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/super.c
-@@ -3583,13 +3583,6 @@ int ext4_feature_set_ok(struct super_block *sb, int readonly)
- "mounted without CONFIG_UNICODE");
- return 0;
+@@ -3559,14 +3559,6 @@ int ext4_feature_set_ok(struct super_block *sb, int readonly)
}
+ #endif
+
- if (EXT4_SB(sb)->s_es->s_def_hash_version == DX_HASH_SIPHASH &&
- !ext4_has_feature_casefold(sb)) {
- ext4_msg(sb, KERN_ERR,
@@ -43,10 +46,11 @@
- "mounted with siphash");
- return 0;
- }
-
+-
if (readonly)
return 1;
-@@ -5095,16 +5088,27 @@ static int ext4_load_super(struct super_block *sb, ext4_fsblk_t *lsb,
+
+@@ -5050,16 +5042,27 @@ static int ext4_load_super(struct super_block *sb, ext4_fsblk_t *lsb,
return ret;
}
@@ -76,22 +80,25 @@
if (ext4_has_feature_dir_index(sb)) {
i = le32_to_cpu(es->s_flags);
if (i & EXT2_FLAGS_UNSIGNED_HASH)
-@@ -5122,6 +5126,7 @@ static void ext4_hash_info_init(struct super_block *sb)
+@@ -5077,6 +5080,7 @@ static void ext4_hash_info_init(struct super_block *sb)
#endif
}
}
+ return 0;
}
- static int ext4_block_group_meta_init(struct super_block *sb, int silent)
-@@ -5257,7 +5262,9 @@ static int __ext4_fill_super(struct fs_context *fc, struct super_block *sb)
- if (err)
- goto failed_mount;
+ static int __ext4_fill_super(struct fs_context *fc, struct super_block *sb)
+@@ -5234,7 +5238,9 @@ static int __ext4_fill_super(struct fs_context *fc, struct super_block *sb)
+ sbi->s_addr_per_block_bits = ilog2(EXT4_ADDR_PER_BLOCK(sb));
+ sbi->s_desc_per_block_bits = ilog2(EXT4_DESC_PER_BLOCK(sb));
- ext4_hash_info_init(sb);
+ err = ext4_hash_info_init(sb);
+ if (err)
+ goto failed_mount;
- err = ext4_handle_clustersize(sb);
- if (err)
+ if (ext4_handle_clustersize(sb))
+ goto failed_mount;
+--
+2.33.8
+
---
Results of testing on various branches:
| Branch | Patch Apply | Build Test |
|---------------------------|-------------|------------|
| stable/linux-6.11.y | Failed (branch not found) | N/A |
| stable/linux-6.6.y | Failed (branch not found) | N/A |
| stable/linux-6.1.y | Failed (branch not found) | N/A |
| stable/linux-5.15.y | Failed (branch not found) | N/A |
| stable/linux-5.10.y | Failed (branch not found) | N/A |
| stable/linux-5.4.y | Failed (branch not found) | N/A |
| stable/linux-4.19.y | Failed (branch not found) | N/A |
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-18 10:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-18 10:20 [PATCH 6.1.y 0/3] ext4: Fix warning related to siphash and ext4 filesystem mounting Vasiliy Kovalev
2024-11-18 10:20 ` [PATCH 1/3] ext4: factor out ext4_hash_info_init() Vasiliy Kovalev
2024-11-19 4:36 ` Sasha Levin
2024-11-18 10:20 ` [PATCH 2/3] ext4: filesystems without casefold feature cannot be mounted with siphash Vasiliy Kovalev
2024-11-19 4:36 ` Sasha Levin
2024-11-18 10:20 ` Vasiliy Kovalev [this message]
2024-11-19 4:36 ` [PATCH 3/3] ext4: fix error message when rejecting the default hash Sasha Levin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241118102050.16077-4-kovalev@altlinux.org \
--to=kovalev@altlinux.org \
--cc=dutyrok@altlinux.org \
--cc=gerben@altlinux.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=lvc-project@linuxtesting.org \
--cc=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox