public inbox for stable@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vasiliy Kovalev <kovalev@altlinux.org>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: lvc-project@linuxtesting.org, dutyrok@altlinux.org,
	gerben@altlinux.org, kovalev@altlinux.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] ext4: fix error message when rejecting the default hash
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2024 13:20:50 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241118102050.16077-4-kovalev@altlinux.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241118102050.16077-1-kovalev@altlinux.org>

From: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@suse.de>

[ Upstream commit a2187431c395cdfbf144e3536f25468c64fc7cfa ]

Commit 985b67cd8639 ("ext4: filesystems without casefold feature cannot
be mounted with siphash") properly rejects volumes where
s_def_hash_version is set to DX_HASH_SIPHASH, but the check and the
error message should not look into casefold setup - a filesystem should
never have DX_HASH_SIPHASH as the default hash.  Fix it and, since we
are there, move the check to ext4_hash_info_init.

Fixes:985b67cd8639 ("ext4: filesystems without casefold feature cannot
be mounted with siphash")

Signed-off-by: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@suse.de>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/87jzg1en6j.fsf_-_@mailhost.krisman.be
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Vasiliy Kovalev <kovalev@altlinux.org>
---
 fs/ext4/ext4.h  |  1 +
 fs/ext4/super.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++-----------
 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/ext4/ext4.h b/fs/ext4/ext4.h
index 72abb8d6caf75..d5706aedf4fef 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/ext4.h
+++ b/fs/ext4/ext4.h
@@ -2449,6 +2449,7 @@ static inline __le16 ext4_rec_len_to_disk(unsigned len, unsigned blocksize)
 #define DX_HASH_HALF_MD4_UNSIGNED	4
 #define DX_HASH_TEA_UNSIGNED		5
 #define DX_HASH_SIPHASH			6
+#define DX_HASH_LAST 			DX_HASH_SIPHASH
 
 static inline u32 ext4_chksum(struct ext4_sb_info *sbi, u32 crc,
 			      const void *address, unsigned int length)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/super.c b/fs/ext4/super.c
index 68070b1859803..3e4b9bf101454 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/super.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/super.c
@@ -3559,14 +3559,6 @@ int ext4_feature_set_ok(struct super_block *sb, int readonly)
 	}
 #endif
 
-	if (EXT4_SB(sb)->s_es->s_def_hash_version == DX_HASH_SIPHASH &&
-	    !ext4_has_feature_casefold(sb)) {
-		ext4_msg(sb, KERN_ERR,
-			 "Filesystem without casefold feature cannot be "
-			 "mounted with siphash");
-		return 0;
-	}
-
 	if (readonly)
 		return 1;
 
@@ -5050,16 +5042,27 @@ static int ext4_load_super(struct super_block *sb, ext4_fsblk_t *lsb,
 	return ret;
 }
 
-static void ext4_hash_info_init(struct super_block *sb)
+static int ext4_hash_info_init(struct super_block *sb)
 {
 	struct ext4_sb_info *sbi = EXT4_SB(sb);
 	struct ext4_super_block *es = sbi->s_es;
 	unsigned int i;
 
+	sbi->s_def_hash_version = es->s_def_hash_version;
+
+	if (sbi->s_def_hash_version > DX_HASH_LAST) {
+		ext4_msg(sb, KERN_ERR,
+			 "Invalid default hash set in the superblock");
+		return -EINVAL;
+	} else if (sbi->s_def_hash_version == DX_HASH_SIPHASH) {
+		ext4_msg(sb, KERN_ERR,
+			 "SIPHASH is not a valid default hash value");
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+
 	for (i = 0; i < 4; i++)
 		sbi->s_hash_seed[i] = le32_to_cpu(es->s_hash_seed[i]);
 
-	sbi->s_def_hash_version = es->s_def_hash_version;
 	if (ext4_has_feature_dir_index(sb)) {
 		i = le32_to_cpu(es->s_flags);
 		if (i & EXT2_FLAGS_UNSIGNED_HASH)
@@ -5077,6 +5080,7 @@ static void ext4_hash_info_init(struct super_block *sb)
 #endif
 		}
 	}
+	return 0;
 }
 
 static int __ext4_fill_super(struct fs_context *fc, struct super_block *sb)
@@ -5234,7 +5238,9 @@ static int __ext4_fill_super(struct fs_context *fc, struct super_block *sb)
 	sbi->s_addr_per_block_bits = ilog2(EXT4_ADDR_PER_BLOCK(sb));
 	sbi->s_desc_per_block_bits = ilog2(EXT4_DESC_PER_BLOCK(sb));
 
-	ext4_hash_info_init(sb);
+	err = ext4_hash_info_init(sb);
+	if (err)
+		goto failed_mount;
 
 	if (ext4_handle_clustersize(sb))
 		goto failed_mount;
-- 
2.33.8


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
To: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Vasiliy Kovalev <kovalev@altlinux.org>, Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] ext4: fix error message when rejecting the default hash
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2024 23:36:35 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241118102050.16077-4-kovalev@altlinux.org> (raw)
Message-ID: <20241119043635.g8uMBK5UglL8AI2bA8e9dlnTS8yntkUP1syTTSIvgjQ@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241118102050.16077-4-kovalev@altlinux.org>

[ Sasha's backport helper bot ]

Hi,

The upstream commit SHA1 provided is correct: a2187431c395cdfbf144e3536f25468c64fc7cfa

WARNING: Author mismatch between patch and upstream commit:
Backport author: Vasiliy Kovalev <kovalev@altlinux.org>
Commit author: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@suse.de>

Commit in newer trees:

|-----------------|----------------------------------------------|
| 6.11.y          |  Present (different SHA1: b5778b2b428a)      |
|-----------------|----------------------------------------------|

Note: The patch differs from the upstream commit:
---
--- -	2024-11-18 22:36:26.886622930 -0500
+++ /tmp/tmp.pApf2ytKkR	2024-11-18 22:36:26.882290161 -0500
@@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
+[ Upstream commit a2187431c395cdfbf144e3536f25468c64fc7cfa ]
+
 Commit 985b67cd8639 ("ext4: filesystems without casefold feature cannot
 be mounted with siphash") properly rejects volumes where
 s_def_hash_version is set to DX_HASH_SIPHASH, but the check and the
@@ -11,16 +13,17 @@
 Signed-off-by: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@suse.de>
 Link: https://patch.msgid.link/87jzg1en6j.fsf_-_@mailhost.krisman.be
 Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
+Signed-off-by: Vasiliy Kovalev <kovalev@altlinux.org>
 ---
  fs/ext4/ext4.h  |  1 +
- fs/ext4/super.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++----------
- 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
+ fs/ext4/super.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++-----------
+ 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
 
 diff --git a/fs/ext4/ext4.h b/fs/ext4/ext4.h
-index 481ece3660eb7..7ac668d4ce83c 100644
+index 72abb8d6caf75..d5706aedf4fef 100644
 --- a/fs/ext4/ext4.h
 +++ b/fs/ext4/ext4.h
-@@ -2462,6 +2462,7 @@ static inline __le16 ext4_rec_len_to_disk(unsigned len, unsigned blocksize)
+@@ -2449,6 +2449,7 @@ static inline __le16 ext4_rec_len_to_disk(unsigned len, unsigned blocksize)
  #define DX_HASH_HALF_MD4_UNSIGNED	4
  #define DX_HASH_TEA_UNSIGNED		5
  #define DX_HASH_SIPHASH			6
@@ -29,13 +32,13 @@
  static inline u32 ext4_chksum(struct ext4_sb_info *sbi, u32 crc,
  			      const void *address, unsigned int length)
 diff --git a/fs/ext4/super.c b/fs/ext4/super.c
-index 58423e6bf3d07..adc5046fe9dd5 100644
+index 68070b1859803..3e4b9bf101454 100644
 --- a/fs/ext4/super.c
 +++ b/fs/ext4/super.c
-@@ -3583,13 +3583,6 @@ int ext4_feature_set_ok(struct super_block *sb, int readonly)
- 			 "mounted without CONFIG_UNICODE");
- 		return 0;
+@@ -3559,14 +3559,6 @@ int ext4_feature_set_ok(struct super_block *sb, int readonly)
  	}
+ #endif
+ 
 -	if (EXT4_SB(sb)->s_es->s_def_hash_version == DX_HASH_SIPHASH &&
 -	    !ext4_has_feature_casefold(sb)) {
 -		ext4_msg(sb, KERN_ERR,
@@ -43,10 +46,11 @@
 -			 "mounted with siphash");
 -		return 0;
 -	}
- 
+-
  	if (readonly)
  		return 1;
-@@ -5095,16 +5088,27 @@ static int ext4_load_super(struct super_block *sb, ext4_fsblk_t *lsb,
+ 
+@@ -5050,16 +5042,27 @@ static int ext4_load_super(struct super_block *sb, ext4_fsblk_t *lsb,
  	return ret;
  }
  
@@ -76,22 +80,25 @@
  	if (ext4_has_feature_dir_index(sb)) {
  		i = le32_to_cpu(es->s_flags);
  		if (i & EXT2_FLAGS_UNSIGNED_HASH)
-@@ -5122,6 +5126,7 @@ static void ext4_hash_info_init(struct super_block *sb)
+@@ -5077,6 +5080,7 @@ static void ext4_hash_info_init(struct super_block *sb)
  #endif
  		}
  	}
 +	return 0;
  }
  
- static int ext4_block_group_meta_init(struct super_block *sb, int silent)
-@@ -5257,7 +5262,9 @@ static int __ext4_fill_super(struct fs_context *fc, struct super_block *sb)
- 	if (err)
- 		goto failed_mount;
+ static int __ext4_fill_super(struct fs_context *fc, struct super_block *sb)
+@@ -5234,7 +5238,9 @@ static int __ext4_fill_super(struct fs_context *fc, struct super_block *sb)
+ 	sbi->s_addr_per_block_bits = ilog2(EXT4_ADDR_PER_BLOCK(sb));
+ 	sbi->s_desc_per_block_bits = ilog2(EXT4_DESC_PER_BLOCK(sb));
  
 -	ext4_hash_info_init(sb);
 +	err = ext4_hash_info_init(sb);
 +	if (err)
 +		goto failed_mount;
  
- 	err = ext4_handle_clustersize(sb);
- 	if (err)
+ 	if (ext4_handle_clustersize(sb))
+ 		goto failed_mount;
+-- 
+2.33.8
+
---

Results of testing on various branches:

| Branch                    | Patch Apply | Build Test |
|---------------------------|-------------|------------|
| stable/linux-6.11.y       |  Failed (branch not found)  |  N/A       |
| stable/linux-6.6.y        |  Failed (branch not found)  |  N/A       |
| stable/linux-6.1.y        |  Failed (branch not found)  |  N/A       |
| stable/linux-5.15.y       |  Failed (branch not found)  |  N/A       |
| stable/linux-5.10.y       |  Failed (branch not found)  |  N/A       |
| stable/linux-5.4.y        |  Failed (branch not found)  |  N/A       |
| stable/linux-4.19.y       |  Failed (branch not found)  |  N/A       |

  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-11-18 10:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-11-18 10:20 [PATCH 6.1.y 0/3] ext4: Fix warning related to siphash and ext4 filesystem mounting Vasiliy Kovalev
2024-11-18 10:20 ` [PATCH 1/3] ext4: factor out ext4_hash_info_init() Vasiliy Kovalev
2024-11-19  4:36   ` Sasha Levin
2024-11-18 10:20 ` [PATCH 2/3] ext4: filesystems without casefold feature cannot be mounted with siphash Vasiliy Kovalev
2024-11-19  4:36   ` Sasha Levin
2024-11-18 10:20 ` Vasiliy Kovalev [this message]
2024-11-19  4:36   ` [PATCH 3/3] ext4: fix error message when rejecting the default hash Sasha Levin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20241118102050.16077-4-kovalev@altlinux.org \
    --to=kovalev@altlinux.org \
    --cc=dutyrok@altlinux.org \
    --cc=gerben@altlinux.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=lvc-project@linuxtesting.org \
    --cc=sashal@kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox