* [PATCH 5.4/5.10/5.15] cifs: Fix buffer overflow when parsing NFS reparse points
@ 2024-11-22 15:29 Mahmoud Adam
2024-11-22 19:26 ` Sasha Levin
2024-11-25 2:23 ` kernel test robot
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Mahmoud Adam @ 2024-11-22 15:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gregkh; +Cc: stfrench, pali, stable, linux-cifs
From: Pali Rohár <pali@kernel.org>
upstream e2a8910af01653c1c268984855629d71fb81f404 commit.
ReparseDataLength is sum of the InodeType size and DataBuffer size.
So to get DataBuffer size it is needed to subtract InodeType's size from
ReparseDataLength.
Function cifs_strndup_from_utf16() is currentlly accessing buf->DataBuffer
at position after the end of the buffer because it does not subtract
InodeType size from the length. Fix this problem and correctly subtract
variable len.
Member InodeType is present only when reparse buffer is large enough. Check
for ReparseDataLength before accessing InodeType to prevent another invalid
memory access.
Major and minor rdev values are present also only when reparse buffer is
large enough. Check for reparse buffer size before calling reparse_mkdev().
Fixes: d5ecebc4900d ("smb3: Allow query of symlinks stored as reparse points")
Reviewed-by: Paulo Alcantara (Red Hat) <pc@manguebit.com>
Signed-off-by: Pali Rohár <pali@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Steve French <stfrench@microsoft.com>
[use variable name symlink_buf, the other buf->InodeType accesses are
not used in current version so skip]
Signed-off-by: Mahmoud Adam <mngyadam@amazon.com>
---
This fixes CVE-2024-49996.
fs/cifs/smb2ops.c | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/fs/cifs/smb2ops.c b/fs/cifs/smb2ops.c
index 6c30fff8a029e..ee9a1e6550e3c 100644
--- a/fs/cifs/smb2ops.c
+++ b/fs/cifs/smb2ops.c
@@ -2971,6 +2971,12 @@ parse_reparse_posix(struct reparse_posix_data *symlink_buf,
/* See MS-FSCC 2.1.2.6 for the 'NFS' style reparse tags */
len = le16_to_cpu(symlink_buf->ReparseDataLength);
+ if (len < sizeof(symlink_buf->InodeType)) {
+ cifs_dbg(VFS, "srv returned malformed nfs buffer\n");
+ return -EIO;
+ }
+
+ len -= sizeof(symlink_buf->InodeType);
if (le64_to_cpu(symlink_buf->InodeType) != NFS_SPECFILE_LNK) {
cifs_dbg(VFS, "%lld not a supported symlink type\n",
--
2.40.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5.4/5.10/5.15] cifs: Fix buffer overflow when parsing NFS reparse points
2024-11-22 15:29 [PATCH 5.4/5.10/5.15] cifs: Fix buffer overflow when parsing NFS reparse points Mahmoud Adam
@ 2024-11-22 19:26 ` Sasha Levin
2024-11-25 2:23 ` kernel test robot
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Sasha Levin @ 2024-11-22 19:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: stable; +Cc: Mahmoud Adam, Sasha Levin
[ Sasha's backport helper bot ]
Hi,
Found matching upstream commit: e2a8910af01653c1c268984855629d71fb81f404
WARNING: Author mismatch between patch and found commit:
Backport author: Mahmoud Adam <mngyadam@amazon.com>
Commit author: Pali Rohár <pali@kernel.org>
Status in newer kernel trees:
6.12.y | Present (exact SHA1)
6.11.y | Present (different SHA1: c173d47b69f0)
6.6.y | Present (different SHA1: c6db81c550ce)
6.1.y | Not found
5.15.y | Not found
Note: The patch differs from the upstream commit:
---
--- - 2024-11-22 12:31:36.852804062 -0500
+++ /tmp/tmp.ZKhxfvejkU 2024-11-22 12:31:36.843027135 -0500
@@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
+upstream e2a8910af01653c1c268984855629d71fb81f404 commit.
+
ReparseDataLength is sum of the InodeType size and DataBuffer size.
So to get DataBuffer size it is needed to subtract InodeType's size from
ReparseDataLength.
@@ -18,48 +20,31 @@
Reviewed-by: Paulo Alcantara (Red Hat) <pc@manguebit.com>
Signed-off-by: Pali Rohár <pali@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Steve French <stfrench@microsoft.com>
+[use variable name symlink_buf, the other buf->InodeType accesses are
+not used in current version so skip]
+Signed-off-by: Mahmoud Adam <mngyadam@amazon.com>
---
- fs/smb/client/reparse.c | 15 ++++++++++++++-
- 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
+This fixes CVE-2024-49996.
+ fs/cifs/smb2ops.c | 6 ++++++
+ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
-diff --git a/fs/smb/client/reparse.c b/fs/smb/client/reparse.c
-index 3b48a093cfb1f..8ea7a848aa393 100644
---- a/fs/smb/client/reparse.c
-+++ b/fs/smb/client/reparse.c
-@@ -320,9 +320,16 @@ static int parse_reparse_posix(struct reparse_posix_data *buf,
- unsigned int len;
- u64 type;
+diff --git a/fs/cifs/smb2ops.c b/fs/cifs/smb2ops.c
+index 6c30fff8a029e..ee9a1e6550e3c 100644
+--- a/fs/cifs/smb2ops.c
++++ b/fs/cifs/smb2ops.c
+@@ -2971,6 +2971,12 @@ parse_reparse_posix(struct reparse_posix_data *symlink_buf,
-+ len = le16_to_cpu(buf->ReparseDataLength);
-+ if (len < sizeof(buf->InodeType)) {
+ /* See MS-FSCC 2.1.2.6 for the 'NFS' style reparse tags */
+ len = le16_to_cpu(symlink_buf->ReparseDataLength);
++ if (len < sizeof(symlink_buf->InodeType)) {
+ cifs_dbg(VFS, "srv returned malformed nfs buffer\n");
+ return -EIO;
+ }
+
-+ len -= sizeof(buf->InodeType);
-+
- switch ((type = le64_to_cpu(buf->InodeType))) {
- case NFS_SPECFILE_LNK:
-- len = le16_to_cpu(buf->ReparseDataLength);
- data->symlink_target = cifs_strndup_from_utf16(buf->DataBuffer,
- len, true,
- cifs_sb->local_nls);
-@@ -482,12 +489,18 @@ bool cifs_reparse_point_to_fattr(struct cifs_sb_info *cifs_sb,
- u32 tag = data->reparse.tag;
++ len -= sizeof(symlink_buf->InodeType);
- if (tag == IO_REPARSE_TAG_NFS && buf) {
-+ if (le16_to_cpu(buf->ReparseDataLength) < sizeof(buf->InodeType))
-+ return false;
- switch (le64_to_cpu(buf->InodeType)) {
- case NFS_SPECFILE_CHR:
-+ if (le16_to_cpu(buf->ReparseDataLength) != sizeof(buf->InodeType) + 8)
-+ return false;
- fattr->cf_mode |= S_IFCHR;
- fattr->cf_rdev = reparse_mkdev(buf->DataBuffer);
- break;
- case NFS_SPECFILE_BLK:
-+ if (le16_to_cpu(buf->ReparseDataLength) != sizeof(buf->InodeType) + 8)
-+ return false;
- fattr->cf_mode |= S_IFBLK;
- fattr->cf_rdev = reparse_mkdev(buf->DataBuffer);
- break;
+ if (le64_to_cpu(symlink_buf->InodeType) != NFS_SPECFILE_LNK) {
+ cifs_dbg(VFS, "%lld not a supported symlink type\n",
+--
+2.40.1
+
---
Results of testing on various branches:
| Branch | Patch Apply | Build Test |
|---------------------------|-------------|------------|
| stable/linux-5.15.y | Success | Success |
| stable/linux-5.10.y | Success | Success |
| stable/linux-5.4.y | Success | Success |
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5.4/5.10/5.15] cifs: Fix buffer overflow when parsing NFS reparse points
2024-11-22 15:29 [PATCH 5.4/5.10/5.15] cifs: Fix buffer overflow when parsing NFS reparse points Mahmoud Adam
2024-11-22 19:26 ` Sasha Levin
@ 2024-11-25 2:23 ` kernel test robot
2024-11-25 8:55 ` Mahmoud Adam
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: kernel test robot @ 2024-11-25 2:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mahmoud Adam; +Cc: stable, oe-kbuild-all
Hi,
Thanks for your patch.
FYI: kernel test robot notices the stable kernel rule is not satisfied.
The check is based on https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/stable-kernel-rules.html#option-3
Rule: The upstream commit ID must be specified with a separate line above the commit text.
Subject: [PATCH 5.4/5.10/5.15] cifs: Fix buffer overflow when parsing NFS reparse points
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/stable/20241122152943.76044-1-mngyadam%40amazon.com
Please ignore this mail if the patch is not relevant for upstream.
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5.4/5.10/5.15] cifs: Fix buffer overflow when parsing NFS reparse points
2024-11-25 2:23 ` kernel test robot
@ 2024-11-25 8:55 ` Mahmoud Adam
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Mahmoud Adam @ 2024-11-25 8:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kernel test robot; +Cc: stable, oe-kbuild-all
kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> writes:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for your patch.
>
> FYI: kernel test robot notices the stable kernel rule is not satisfied.
>
> The check is based on https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/stable-kernel-rules.html#option-3
>
> Rule: The upstream commit ID must be specified with a separate line above the commit text.
> Subject: [PATCH 5.4/5.10/5.15] cifs: Fix buffer overflow when parsing NFS reparse points
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/stable/20241122152943.76044-1-mngyadam%40amazon.com
>
> Please ignore this mail if the patch is not relevant for upstream.
The commit id is there but in upstream <sha> commit, wrong format.
I've sent a v2.
-MNAdam
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-11-25 8:55 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-11-22 15:29 [PATCH 5.4/5.10/5.15] cifs: Fix buffer overflow when parsing NFS reparse points Mahmoud Adam
2024-11-22 19:26 ` Sasha Levin
2024-11-25 2:23 ` kernel test robot
2024-11-25 8:55 ` Mahmoud Adam
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).