From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@linux.ibm.com>,
Gerd Bayer <gbayer@linux.ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>,
gor@linux.ibm.com, agordeev@linux.ibm.com,
gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com, jgg@ziepe.ca,
mjrosato@linux.ibm.com, lukas@wunner.de, wintera@linux.ibm.com,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.12 02/19] s390/pci: Use topology ID for multi-function devices
Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2024 07:38:37 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241124123912.3335344-2-sashal@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241124123912.3335344-1-sashal@kernel.org>
From: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@linux.ibm.com>
[ Upstream commit 126034faaac5f356822c4a9bebfa75664da11056 ]
The newly introduced topology ID (TID) field in the CLP Query PCI
Function explicitly identifies groups of PCI functions whose RIDs belong
to the same (sub-)topology. When available use the TID instead of the
PCHID to match zPCI busses/domains for multi-function devices. Note that
currently only a single PCI bus per TID is supported. This change is
required because in future machines the PCHID will not identify a PCI
card but a specific port in the case of some multi-port NICs while from
a PCI point of view the entire card is a subtopology.
Reviewed-by: Gerd Bayer <gbayer@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
arch/s390/include/asm/pci.h | 9 ++++++---
arch/s390/include/asm/pci_clp.h | 8 +++++---
arch/s390/pci/pci_bus.c | 17 ++++++++++-------
arch/s390/pci/pci_clp.c | 3 +++
4 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/pci.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/pci.h
index 45e87c7c122a6..e107eda7af86f 100644
--- a/arch/s390/include/asm/pci.h
+++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/pci.h
@@ -107,9 +107,10 @@ struct zpci_bus {
struct list_head resources;
struct list_head bus_next;
struct resource bus_resource;
- int pchid;
+ int topo; /* TID if topo_is_tid, PCHID otherwise */
int domain_nr;
- bool multifunction;
+ u8 multifunction : 1;
+ u8 topo_is_tid : 1;
enum pci_bus_speed max_bus_speed;
};
@@ -131,6 +132,7 @@ struct zpci_dev {
u16 pchid; /* physical channel ID */
u16 maxstbl; /* Maximum store block size */
u16 rid; /* RID as supplied by firmware */
+ u16 tid; /* Topology for which RID is valid */
u8 pfgid; /* function group ID */
u8 pft; /* pci function type */
u8 port;
@@ -141,7 +143,8 @@ struct zpci_dev {
u8 is_physfn : 1;
u8 util_str_avail : 1;
u8 irqs_registered : 1;
- u8 reserved : 2;
+ u8 tid_avail : 1;
+ u8 reserved : 1;
unsigned int devfn; /* DEVFN part of the RID*/
u8 pfip[CLP_PFIP_NR_SEGMENTS]; /* pci function internal path */
diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/pci_clp.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/pci_clp.h
index f0c677ddd2706..14afb9ce91f3b 100644
--- a/arch/s390/include/asm/pci_clp.h
+++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/pci_clp.h
@@ -110,7 +110,8 @@ struct clp_req_query_pci {
struct clp_rsp_query_pci {
struct clp_rsp_hdr hdr;
u16 vfn; /* virtual fn number */
- u16 : 3;
+ u16 : 2;
+ u16 tid_avail : 1;
u16 rid_avail : 1;
u16 is_physfn : 1;
u16 reserved1 : 1;
@@ -130,8 +131,9 @@ struct clp_rsp_query_pci {
u64 edma; /* end dma as */
#define ZPCI_RID_MASK_DEVFN 0x00ff
u16 rid; /* BUS/DEVFN PCI address */
- u16 reserved0;
- u32 reserved[10];
+ u32 reserved0;
+ u16 tid;
+ u32 reserved[9];
u32 uid; /* user defined id */
u8 util_str[CLP_UTIL_STR_LEN]; /* utility string */
u32 reserved2[16];
diff --git a/arch/s390/pci/pci_bus.c b/arch/s390/pci/pci_bus.c
index daa5d7450c7d3..54879e773e4a3 100644
--- a/arch/s390/pci/pci_bus.c
+++ b/arch/s390/pci/pci_bus.c
@@ -232,13 +232,13 @@ static void zpci_bus_put(struct zpci_bus *zbus)
kref_put(&zbus->kref, zpci_bus_release);
}
-static struct zpci_bus *zpci_bus_get(int pchid)
+static struct zpci_bus *zpci_bus_get(int topo, bool topo_is_tid)
{
struct zpci_bus *zbus;
mutex_lock(&zbus_list_lock);
list_for_each_entry(zbus, &zbus_list, bus_next) {
- if (pchid == zbus->pchid) {
+ if (topo_is_tid == zbus->topo_is_tid && topo == zbus->topo) {
kref_get(&zbus->kref);
goto out_unlock;
}
@@ -249,7 +249,7 @@ static struct zpci_bus *zpci_bus_get(int pchid)
return zbus;
}
-static struct zpci_bus *zpci_bus_alloc(int pchid)
+static struct zpci_bus *zpci_bus_alloc(int topo, bool topo_is_tid)
{
struct zpci_bus *zbus;
@@ -257,7 +257,8 @@ static struct zpci_bus *zpci_bus_alloc(int pchid)
if (!zbus)
return NULL;
- zbus->pchid = pchid;
+ zbus->topo = topo;
+ zbus->topo_is_tid = topo_is_tid;
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&zbus->bus_next);
mutex_lock(&zbus_list_lock);
list_add_tail(&zbus->bus_next, &zbus_list);
@@ -321,8 +322,9 @@ static int zpci_bus_add_device(struct zpci_bus *zbus, struct zpci_dev *zdev)
int zpci_bus_device_register(struct zpci_dev *zdev, struct pci_ops *ops)
{
+ bool topo_is_tid = zdev->tid_avail;
struct zpci_bus *zbus = NULL;
- int rc = -EBADF;
+ int topo, rc = -EBADF;
if (zpci_nb_devices == ZPCI_NR_DEVICES) {
pr_warn("Adding PCI function %08x failed because the configured limit of %d is reached\n",
@@ -333,11 +335,12 @@ int zpci_bus_device_register(struct zpci_dev *zdev, struct pci_ops *ops)
if (zdev->devfn >= ZPCI_FUNCTIONS_PER_BUS)
return -EINVAL;
+ topo = topo_is_tid ? zdev->tid : zdev->pchid;
if (!s390_pci_no_rid && zdev->rid_available)
- zbus = zpci_bus_get(zdev->pchid);
+ zbus = zpci_bus_get(topo, topo_is_tid);
if (!zbus) {
- zbus = zpci_bus_alloc(zdev->pchid);
+ zbus = zpci_bus_alloc(topo, topo_is_tid);
if (!zbus)
return -ENOMEM;
}
diff --git a/arch/s390/pci/pci_clp.c b/arch/s390/pci/pci_clp.c
index f7430086e9739..e222036874e51 100644
--- a/arch/s390/pci/pci_clp.c
+++ b/arch/s390/pci/pci_clp.c
@@ -170,6 +170,9 @@ static int clp_store_query_pci_fn(struct zpci_dev *zdev,
zdev->rid = response->rid;
if (!s390_pci_no_rid && zdev->rid_available)
zdev->devfn = response->rid & ZPCI_RID_MASK_DEVFN;
+ zdev->tid_avail = response->tid_avail;
+ if (zdev->tid_avail)
+ zdev->tid = response->tid;
memcpy(zdev->pfip, response->pfip, sizeof(zdev->pfip));
if (response->util_str_avail) {
--
2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-24 12:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-24 12:38 [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.12 01/19] s390/pci: Sort PCI functions prior to creating virtual busses Sasha Levin
2024-11-24 12:38 ` Sasha Levin [this message]
2024-11-24 12:38 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.12 03/19] s390/pci: Ignore RID for isolated VFs Sasha Levin
2024-11-24 12:38 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.12 04/19] epoll: annotate racy check Sasha Levin
2024-11-24 12:38 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.12 05/19] kselftest/arm64: Log fp-stress child startup errors to stdout Sasha Levin
2024-11-24 12:38 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.12 06/19] s390/cpum_sf: Handle CPU hotplug remove during sampling Sasha Levin
2024-11-24 12:38 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.12 07/19] block: RCU protect disk->conv_zones_bitmap Sasha Levin
2024-11-24 12:38 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.12 08/19] btrfs: don't take dev_replace rwsem on task already holding it Sasha Levin
2024-11-24 12:38 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.12 09/19] btrfs: zlib: make the compression path to handle sector size < page size Sasha Levin
2024-11-25 15:20 ` David Sterba
2024-12-10 16:20 ` Sasha Levin
2024-11-24 12:38 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.12 10/19] btrfs: make extent_range_clear_dirty_for_io() to handle sector size < page size cases Sasha Levin
2024-11-25 15:21 ` David Sterba
2024-11-24 12:38 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.12 11/19] btrfs: avoid unnecessary device path update for the same device Sasha Levin
2024-11-24 12:38 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.12 12/19] btrfs: canonicalize the device path before adding it Sasha Levin
2024-11-24 12:38 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.12 13/19] btrfs: reduce lock contention when eb cache miss for btree search Sasha Levin
2024-11-25 11:23 ` Filipe Manana
2024-11-24 12:38 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.12 14/19] btrfs: do not clear read-only when adding sprout device Sasha Levin
2024-11-24 12:38 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.12 15/19] btrfs: fix warning on PTR_ERR() against NULL device at btrfs_control_ioctl() Sasha Levin
2024-11-24 12:38 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.12 16/19] md/raid1: Handle bio_split() errors Sasha Levin
2024-11-25 8:55 ` John Garry
2024-12-10 16:21 ` Sasha Levin
2024-11-24 12:38 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.12 17/19] kselftest/arm64: Corrupt P0 in the irritator when testing SSVE Sasha Levin
2024-11-24 12:38 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.12 18/19] kselftest/arm64: Don't leak pipe fds in pac.exec_sign_all() Sasha Levin
2024-11-24 12:38 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.12 19/19] ext4: partial zero eof block on unaligned inode size extension Sasha Levin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241124123912.3335344-2-sashal@kernel.org \
--to=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gbayer@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lukas@wunner.de \
--cc=mjrosato@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=schnelle@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wintera@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox