From: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
To: "Michael C. Pratt" <mcpratt@pm.me>
Cc: <oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev>, <lkp@intel.com>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <ltp@lists.linux.it>,
<aubrey.li@linux.intel.com>, <yu.c.chen@intel.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
"Michael C . Pratt" <mcpratt@pm.me>, <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
<oliver.sang@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND 2 1/1] sched/syscalls: Allow setting niceness using sched_param struct
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2024 22:33:53 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202411252241.2d75c2f6-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241111070152.9781-2-mcpratt@pm.me>
Hello,
kernel test robot noticed "ltp.sched_get_priority_min01.fail" on:
commit: ecd04eb1e1d00bbd158b2f7d1353af709d8131a7 ("[PATCH RESEND 2 1/1] sched/syscalls: Allow setting niceness using sched_param struct")
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Michael-C-Pratt/sched-syscalls-Allow-setting-niceness-using-sched_param-struct/20241111-150517
base: https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git fe9beaaa802d44d881b165430b3239a9d7bebf30
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241111070152.9781-2-mcpratt@pm.me/
patch subject: [PATCH RESEND 2 1/1] sched/syscalls: Allow setting niceness using sched_param struct
in testcase: ltp
version: ltp-x86_64-14c1f76-1_20241111
with following parameters:
disk: 1HDD
fs: xfs
test: syscalls-07
config: x86_64-rhel-8.3-ltp
compiler: gcc-12
test machine: 4 threads 1 sockets Intel(R) Core(TM) i3-3220 CPU @ 3.30GHz (Ivy Bridge) with 8G memory
(please refer to attached dmesg/kmsg for entire log/backtrace)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202411252241.2d75c2f6-lkp@intel.com
<<<test_start>>>
tag=sched_get_priority_min01 stime=1732078544
cmdline="sched_get_priority_min01"
contacts=""
analysis=exit
<<<test_output>>>
tst_test.c:1890: TINFO: LTP version: 20240930-63-g6408294d8
tst_test.c:1894: TINFO: Tested kernel: 6.12.0-rc4-00035-gecd04eb1e1d0 #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Sun Nov 17 15:27:30 CST 2024 x86_64
tst_test.c:1725: TINFO: Timeout per run is 0h 02m 30s
sched_get_priority_min01.c:42: TFAIL: SCHED_BATCH retval 100 != 0: SUCCESS (0)
sched_get_priority_min01.c:42: TPASS: SCHED_DEADLINE passed
sched_get_priority_min01.c:42: TPASS: SCHED_FIFO passed
sched_get_priority_min01.c:42: TPASS: SCHED_IDLE passed
sched_get_priority_min01.c:42: TFAIL: SCHED_OTHER retval 100 != 0: SUCCESS (0)
sched_get_priority_min01.c:42: TPASS: SCHED_RR passed
Summary:
passed 4
failed 2
broken 0
skipped 0
warnings 0
<<<execution_status>>>
initiation_status="ok"
duration=0 termination_type=exited termination_id=1 corefile=no
cutime=0 cstime=1
<<<test_end>>>
The kernel config and materials to reproduce are available at:
https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241125/202411252241.2d75c2f6-lkp@intel.com
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-25 14:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20241111070152.9781-1-mcpratt@pm.me>
2024-11-11 7:03 ` [PATCH RESEND 2 1/1] sched/syscalls: Allow setting niceness using sched_param struct Michael C. Pratt
2024-11-12 15:34 ` Steven Rostedt
2024-11-13 0:13 ` Michael Pratt
2024-11-13 0:36 ` Steven Rostedt
2024-11-13 6:04 ` Michael Pratt
2024-11-13 14:58 ` Steven Rostedt
2024-11-25 14:33 ` kernel test robot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202411252241.2d75c2f6-lkp@intel.com \
--to=oliver.sang@intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=aubrey.li@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
--cc=mcpratt@pm.me \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox