From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: mm-commits@vger.kernel.org,vschneid@redhat.com,vincent.guittot@linaro.org,vbabka@suse.cz,sunjw10@lenovo.com,stable@vger.kernel.org,rostedt@goodmis.org,raghavendra.kt@amd.com,peterz@infradead.org,mingo@redhat.com,mgorman@suse.de,juri.lelli@redhat.com,dietmar.eggemann@arm.com,bsegall@google.com,ahuang12@lenovo.com,akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: + sched-numa-fix-memory-leak-due-to-the-overwritten-vma-numab_state.patch added to mm-hotfixes-unstable branch
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2024 20:17:40 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241130041740.DC9CAC4CECC@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
The patch titled
Subject: sched/numa: fix memory leak due to the overwritten vma->numab_state
has been added to the -mm mm-hotfixes-unstable branch. Its filename is
sched-numa-fix-memory-leak-due-to-the-overwritten-vma-numab_state.patch
This patch will shortly appear at
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/25-new.git/tree/patches/sched-numa-fix-memory-leak-due-to-the-overwritten-vma-numab_state.patch
This patch will later appear in the mm-hotfixes-unstable branch at
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's
*** Remember to use Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst when testing your code ***
The -mm tree is included into linux-next via the mm-everything
branch at git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
and is updated there every 2-3 working days
------------------------------------------------------
From: Adrian Huang <ahuang12@lenovo.com>
Subject: sched/numa: fix memory leak due to the overwritten vma->numab_state
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2024 18:21:46 +0800
[Problem Description]
When running the hackbench program of LTP, the following memory leak is
reported by kmemleak.
# /opt/ltp/testcases/bin/hackbench 20 thread 1000
Running with 20*40 (== 800) tasks.
# dmesg | grep kmemleak
...
kmemleak: 480 new suspected memory leaks (see /sys/kernel/debug/kmemleak)
kmemleak: 665 new suspected memory leaks (see /sys/kernel/debug/kmemleak)
# cat /sys/kernel/debug/kmemleak
unreferenced object 0xffff888cd8ca2c40 (size 64):
comm "hackbench", pid 17142, jiffies 4299780315
hex dump (first 32 bytes):
ac 74 49 00 01 00 00 00 4c 84 49 00 01 00 00 00 .tI.....L.I.....
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
backtrace (crc bff18fd4):
[<ffffffff81419a89>] __kmalloc_cache_noprof+0x2f9/0x3f0
[<ffffffff8113f715>] task_numa_work+0x725/0xa00
[<ffffffff8110f878>] task_work_run+0x58/0x90
[<ffffffff81ddd9f8>] syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x1c8/0x1e0
[<ffffffff81dd78d5>] do_syscall_64+0x85/0x150
[<ffffffff81e0012b>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e
...
This issue can be consistently reproduced on three different servers:
* a 448-core server
* a 256-core server
* a 192-core server
[Root Cause]
Since multiple threads are created by the hackbench program (along with
the command argument 'thread'), a shared vma might be accessed by two or
more cores simultaneously. When two or more cores observe that
vma->numab_state is NULL at the same time, vma->numab_state will be
overwritten.
Although current code ensures that only one thread scans the VMAs in a
single 'numa_scan_period', there might be a chance for another thread
to enter in the next 'numa_scan_period' while we have not gotten till
numab_state allocation [1].
Note that the command `/opt/ltp/testcases/bin/hackbench 50 process 1000`
cannot the reproduce the issue. It is verified with 200+ test runs.
[Solution]
Use the cmpxchg atomic operation to ensure that only one thread executes
the vma->numab_state assignment.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/1794be3c-358c-4cdc-a43d-a1f841d91ef7@amd.com/
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241113102146.2384-1-ahuang12@lenovo.com
Fixes: ef6a22b70f6d ("sched/numa: apply the scan delay to every new vma")
Signed-off-by: Adrian Huang <ahuang12@lenovo.com>
Reported-by: Jiwei Sun <sunjw10@lenovo.com>
Reviewed-by: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>
Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>
Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---
kernel/sched/fair.c | 12 +++++++++---
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c~sched-numa-fix-memory-leak-due-to-the-overwritten-vma-numab_state
+++ a/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -3399,10 +3399,16 @@ retry_pids:
/* Initialise new per-VMA NUMAB state. */
if (!vma->numab_state) {
- vma->numab_state = kzalloc(sizeof(struct vma_numab_state),
- GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!vma->numab_state)
+ struct vma_numab_state *ptr;
+
+ ptr = kzalloc(sizeof(*ptr), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!ptr)
+ continue;
+
+ if (cmpxchg(&vma->numab_state, NULL, ptr)) {
+ kfree(ptr);
continue;
+ }
vma->numab_state->start_scan_seq = mm->numa_scan_seq;
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from ahuang12@lenovo.com are
sched-numa-fix-memory-leak-due-to-the-overwritten-vma-numab_state.patch
reply other threads:[~2024-11-30 4:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241130041740.DC9CAC4CECC@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ahuang12@lenovo.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mm-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=raghavendra.kt@amd.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sunjw10@lenovo.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox