From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: oliver.upton@linux.dev,glider@google.com,maz@kernel.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] KVM: arm64: Don't retire aborted MMIO instruction" failed to apply to 5.10-stable tree
Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2024 16:06:09 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2024120209-cranberry-font-7473@gregkh> (raw)
The patch below does not apply to the 5.10-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.
To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:
git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-5.10.y
git checkout FETCH_HEAD
git cherry-pick -x e735a5da64420a86be370b216c269b5dd8e830e2
# <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.>
git commit -s
git send-email --to '<stable@vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2024120209-cranberry-font-7473@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 5.10.y' HEAD^..
Possible dependencies:
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From e735a5da64420a86be370b216c269b5dd8e830e2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2024 20:31:03 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] KVM: arm64: Don't retire aborted MMIO instruction
Returning an abort to the guest for an unsupported MMIO access is a
documented feature of the KVM UAPI. Nevertheless, it's clear that this
plumbing has seen limited testing, since userspace can trivially cause a
WARN in the MMIO return:
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 30558 at arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h:536 kvm_handle_mmio_return+0x46c/0x5c4 arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h:536
Call trace:
kvm_handle_mmio_return+0x46c/0x5c4 arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h:536
kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run+0x98/0x15b4 arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c:1133
kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x75c/0xa78 virt/kvm/kvm_main.c:4487
__do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline]
__se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:893 [inline]
__arm64_sys_ioctl+0x14c/0x1c8 fs/ioctl.c:893
__invoke_syscall arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:35 [inline]
invoke_syscall+0x98/0x2b8 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:49
el0_svc_common+0x1e0/0x23c arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:132
do_el0_svc+0x48/0x58 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:151
el0_svc+0x38/0x68 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:712
el0t_64_sync_handler+0x90/0xfc arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:730
el0t_64_sync+0x190/0x194 arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S:598
The splat is complaining that KVM is advancing PC while an exception is
pending, i.e. that KVM is retiring the MMIO instruction despite a
pending synchronous external abort. Womp womp.
Fix the glaring UAPI bug by skipping over all the MMIO emulation in
case there is a pending synchronous exception. Note that while userspace
is capable of pending an asynchronous exception (SError, IRQ, or FIQ),
it is still safe to retire the MMIO instruction in this case as (1) they
are by definition asynchronous, and (2) KVM relies on hardware support
for pending/delivering these exceptions instead of the software state
machine for advancing PC.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: da345174ceca ("KVM: arm/arm64: Allow user injection of external data aborts")
Reported-by: Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241025203106.3529261-2-oliver.upton@linux.dev
Signed-off-by: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmio.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmio.c
index cd6b7b83e2c3..ab365e839874 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmio.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmio.c
@@ -72,6 +72,31 @@ unsigned long kvm_mmio_read_buf(const void *buf, unsigned int len)
return data;
}
+static bool kvm_pending_sync_exception(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+ if (!vcpu_get_flag(vcpu, PENDING_EXCEPTION))
+ return false;
+
+ if (vcpu_el1_is_32bit(vcpu)) {
+ switch (vcpu_get_flag(vcpu, EXCEPT_MASK)) {
+ case unpack_vcpu_flag(EXCEPT_AA32_UND):
+ case unpack_vcpu_flag(EXCEPT_AA32_IABT):
+ case unpack_vcpu_flag(EXCEPT_AA32_DABT):
+ return true;
+ default:
+ return false;
+ }
+ } else {
+ switch (vcpu_get_flag(vcpu, EXCEPT_MASK)) {
+ case unpack_vcpu_flag(EXCEPT_AA64_EL1_SYNC):
+ case unpack_vcpu_flag(EXCEPT_AA64_EL2_SYNC):
+ return true;
+ default:
+ return false;
+ }
+ }
+}
+
/**
* kvm_handle_mmio_return -- Handle MMIO loads after user space emulation
* or in-kernel IO emulation
@@ -84,8 +109,11 @@ int kvm_handle_mmio_return(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
unsigned int len;
int mask;
- /* Detect an already handled MMIO return */
- if (unlikely(!vcpu->mmio_needed))
+ /*
+ * Detect if the MMIO return was already handled or if userspace aborted
+ * the MMIO access.
+ */
+ if (unlikely(!vcpu->mmio_needed || kvm_pending_sync_exception(vcpu)))
return 1;
vcpu->mmio_needed = 0;
reply other threads:[~2024-12-02 15:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2024120209-cranberry-font-7473@gregkh \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=glider@google.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox