From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: chenqiuji666@gmail.com,jgross@suse.com
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] xen: Fix the issue of resource not being properly released in" failed to apply to 4.19-stable tree
Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2024 11:59:21 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2024120221-serving-certainly-75b1@gregkh> (raw)
The patch below does not apply to the 4.19-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.
To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:
git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-4.19.y
git checkout FETCH_HEAD
git cherry-pick -x afc545da381ba0c651b2658966ac737032676f01
# <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.>
git commit -s
git send-email --to '<stable@vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2024120221-serving-certainly-75b1@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 4.19.y' HEAD^..
Possible dependencies:
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From afc545da381ba0c651b2658966ac737032676f01 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Qiu-ji Chen <chenqiuji666@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2024 21:09:19 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] xen: Fix the issue of resource not being properly released in
xenbus_dev_probe()
This patch fixes an issue in the function xenbus_dev_probe(). In the
xenbus_dev_probe() function, within the if (err) branch at line 313, the
program incorrectly returns err directly without releasing the resources
allocated by err = drv->probe(dev, id). As the return value is non-zero,
the upper layers assume the processing logic has failed. However, the probe
operation was performed earlier without a corresponding remove operation.
Since the probe actually allocates resources, failing to perform the remove
operation could lead to problems.
To fix this issue, we followed the resource release logic of the
xenbus_dev_remove() function by adding a new block fail_remove before the
fail_put block. After entering the branch if (err) at line 313, the
function will use a goto statement to jump to the fail_remove block,
ensuring that the previously acquired resources are correctly released,
thus preventing the reference count leak.
This bug was identified by an experimental static analysis tool developed
by our team. The tool specializes in analyzing reference count operations
and detecting potential issues where resources are not properly managed.
In this case, the tool flagged the missing release operation as a
potential problem, which led to the development of this patch.
Fixes: 4bac07c993d0 ("xen: add the Xenbus sysfs and virtual device hotplug driver")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Qiu-ji Chen <chenqiuji666@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Message-ID: <20241105130919.4621-1-chenqiuji666@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
diff --git a/drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_probe.c b/drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_probe.c
index 9f097f1f4a4c..6d32ffb01136 100644
--- a/drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_probe.c
+++ b/drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_probe.c
@@ -313,7 +313,7 @@ int xenbus_dev_probe(struct device *_dev)
if (err) {
dev_warn(&dev->dev, "watch_otherend on %s failed.\n",
dev->nodename);
- return err;
+ goto fail_remove;
}
dev->spurious_threshold = 1;
@@ -322,6 +322,12 @@ int xenbus_dev_probe(struct device *_dev)
dev->nodename);
return 0;
+fail_remove:
+ if (drv->remove) {
+ down(&dev->reclaim_sem);
+ drv->remove(dev);
+ up(&dev->reclaim_sem);
+ }
fail_put:
module_put(drv->driver.owner);
fail:
reply other threads:[~2024-12-02 10:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2024120221-serving-certainly-75b1@gregkh \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=chenqiuji666@gmail.com \
--cc=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox