From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: chao@kernel.org,jaegeuk@kernel.org,piergiorgio.sartor@nexgo.de
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] f2fs: fix to drop all discards after creating snapshot on lvm" failed to apply to 6.1-stable tree
Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2024 13:06:13 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2024120613-dating-jawless-e589@gregkh> (raw)
The patch below does not apply to the 6.1-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.
To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:
git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.1.y
git checkout FETCH_HEAD
git cherry-pick -x bc8aeb04fd80cb8cfae3058445c84410fd0beb5e
# <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.>
git commit -s
git send-email --to '<stable@vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2024120613-dating-jawless-e589@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.1.y' HEAD^..
Possible dependencies:
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From bc8aeb04fd80cb8cfae3058445c84410fd0beb5e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2024 22:17:16 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] f2fs: fix to drop all discards after creating snapshot on lvm
device
Piergiorgio reported a bug in bugzilla as below:
------------[ cut here ]------------
WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 969 at fs/f2fs/segment.c:1330
RIP: 0010:__submit_discard_cmd+0x27d/0x400 [f2fs]
Call Trace:
__issue_discard_cmd+0x1ca/0x350 [f2fs]
issue_discard_thread+0x191/0x480 [f2fs]
kthread+0xcf/0x100
ret_from_fork+0x31/0x50
ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30
w/ below testcase, it can reproduce this bug quickly:
- pvcreate /dev/vdb
- vgcreate myvg1 /dev/vdb
- lvcreate -L 1024m -n mylv1 myvg1
- mount /dev/myvg1/mylv1 /mnt/f2fs
- dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/f2fs/file bs=1M count=20
- sync
- rm /mnt/f2fs/file
- sync
- lvcreate -L 1024m -s -n mylv1-snapshot /dev/myvg1/mylv1
- umount /mnt/f2fs
The root cause is: it will update discard_max_bytes of mounted lvm
device to zero after creating snapshot on this lvm device, then,
__submit_discard_cmd() will pass parameter @nr_sects w/ zero value
to __blkdev_issue_discard(), it returns a NULL bio pointer, result
in panic.
This patch changes as below for fixing:
1. Let's drop all remained discards in f2fs_unfreeze() if snapshot
of lvm device is created.
2. Checking discard_max_bytes before submitting discard during
__submit_discard_cmd().
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 35ec7d574884 ("f2fs: split discard command in prior to block layer")
Reported-by: Piergiorgio Sartor <piergiorgio.sartor@nexgo.de>
Closes: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=219484
Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
index 4236040e3994..eade36c5ef13 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
@@ -1290,16 +1290,18 @@ static int __submit_discard_cmd(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
wait_list, issued);
return 0;
}
-
- /*
- * Issue discard for conventional zones only if the device
- * supports discard.
- */
- if (!bdev_max_discard_sectors(bdev))
- return -EOPNOTSUPP;
}
#endif
+ /*
+ * stop issuing discard for any of below cases:
+ * 1. device is conventional zone, but it doesn't support discard.
+ * 2. device is regulare device, after snapshot it doesn't support
+ * discard.
+ */
+ if (!bdev_max_discard_sectors(bdev))
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+
trace_f2fs_issue_discard(bdev, dc->di.start, dc->di.len);
lstart = dc->di.lstart;
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/super.c b/fs/f2fs/super.c
index c0670cd61956..fc7d463dee15 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/super.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/super.c
@@ -1760,6 +1760,18 @@ static int f2fs_freeze(struct super_block *sb)
static int f2fs_unfreeze(struct super_block *sb)
{
+ struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi = F2FS_SB(sb);
+
+ /*
+ * It will update discard_max_bytes of mounted lvm device to zero
+ * after creating snapshot on this lvm device, let's drop all
+ * remained discards.
+ * We don't need to disable real-time discard because discard_max_bytes
+ * will recover after removal of snapshot.
+ */
+ if (test_opt(sbi, DISCARD) && !f2fs_hw_support_discard(sbi))
+ f2fs_issue_discard_timeout(sbi);
+
clear_sbi_flag(F2FS_SB(sb), SBI_IS_FREEZING);
return 0;
}
reply other threads:[~2024-12-06 12:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2024120613-dating-jawless-e589@gregkh \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=chao@kernel.org \
--cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=piergiorgio.sartor@nexgo.de \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox